Alexander Karyn E, Brijnath Bianca, Biezen Ruby, Hampton Kerry, Mazza Danielle
Department of General Practice, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Building 1, 270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Department of General Practice, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Building 1, 270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Prev Med. 2017 Jun;99:236-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
High rates of preventable health problems amongst children in economically developed countries have prompted governments to seek pathways for early intervention. We systematically reviewed the literature to discover what primary care-targeted interventions increased preventive healthcare (e.g. review child development, growth, vision screening, social-emotional health) for preschool children, excluding vaccinations. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for published intervention studies, between years 2000 and 2014, which reflected preventive health activities for preschool children, delivered by health practitioners. Analysis included an assessment of study quality and the primary outcome measures employed. Of the 743 titles retrieved, 29 individual studies were selected, all originating from the United States. Twenty-four studies employed complex, multifaceted interventions and only two were rated high quality. Twelve studies addressed childhood overweight and 11 targeted general health and development. Most interventions reported outcomes that increased rates of screening, recording and recognition of health risks. Only six studies followed up children post-intervention, noting low referral rates by health practitioners and poor follow-through by parents and no study demonstrated clear health benefits for children. Preliminary evidence suggests that multi-component interventions, that combine training of health practitioners and office staff with modification of the physical environment and/or practice support, may be more effective than single component interventions. Quality Improvement interventions have been extensively replicated but their success may have relied on factors beyond the confines of individual or practice-led behaviour. This research reinforces the need for high quality studies of pediatric health assessments with the inclusion of clinical end-points.
经济发达国家儿童中可预防健康问题的高发生率促使政府寻求早期干预途径。我们系统回顾了文献,以发现哪些针对初级保健的干预措施增加了学龄前儿童的预防性医疗保健(如儿童发育评估、生长监测、视力筛查、社会情感健康),不包括疫苗接种。我们在MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane数据库中检索了2000年至2014年间发表的干预研究,这些研究反映了由卫生从业人员提供的学龄前儿童预防性健康活动。分析包括对研究质量和所采用的主要结局指标的评估。在检索到的743篇文献标题中,选择了29项独立研究,均来自美国。24项研究采用了复杂的多方面干预措施,只有两项被评为高质量。12项研究涉及儿童超重问题,11项针对一般健康和发育。大多数干预措施报告的结果是筛查、记录和识别健康风险的发生率有所提高。只有六项研究在干预后对儿童进行了随访,指出卫生从业人员的转诊率较低,家长的后续跟进情况较差,没有研究表明对儿童有明显的健康益处。初步证据表明,将卫生从业人员和办公室工作人员的培训与物理环境的改变和/或实践支持相结合的多成分干预措施可能比单成分干预措施更有效。质量改进干预措施已被广泛复制,但其成功可能依赖于个体或实践主导行为范围之外的因素。这项研究强化了开展高质量儿科健康评估研究并纳入临床终点的必要性。