Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, United States of America.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, United States of America.
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Jul 10;23(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02544-y.
Because children spend much of their time in schools, schools can play an important role in asthma education for the one in 12 affected children in the United States. School-based asthma education programs are commonly repeated annually, however few studies have evaluated the impact of repeated participation in asthma education in school-based programs.
This observational study evaluated the impact of Fight Asthma Now© (FAN), a school-based asthma education program for children in Illinois schools. Participants completed a survey at the start and end of the program, including demographics, prior asthma education, and 11 asthma knowledge questions (maximum knowledge score = 11).
Among 4,951 youth participating in the school-based asthma education program, mean age was 10.75 years. Approximately half were male and Black. Over half reported no prior asthma education (54.6%). At baseline, repeat attendees had significantly higher knowledge versus first-time attendees (mean: 7.45 versus 5.92; p < 0.001). After the program, both first-time and repeat attendees had significant knowledge improvements (first-time: mean = 5.92◊9.32; p < 0.001; repeat: mean = 7.45◊9.62; p < 0.001).
School-based asthma education is effective for increasing asthma knowledge. Notably, repeated asthma education in school leads to incremental benefits for knowledge. Future studies are needed to understand the effects of repeated asthma education on morbidity.
由于儿童在学校度过了大量时间,学校可以在美国每 12 个受影响的儿童中发挥重要作用,为其提供哮喘教育。基于学校的哮喘教育计划通常每年重复进行,但是很少有研究评估在基于学校的计划中重复参与哮喘教育的影响。
本观察性研究评估了“现在抗击哮喘”(Fight Asthma Now©,FAN)计划的影响,该计划是伊利诺伊州学校为儿童提供的一项基于学校的哮喘教育计划。参与者在计划开始和结束时完成了一项调查,包括人口统计学资料、先前的哮喘教育以及 11 个哮喘知识问题(最高知识得分为 11 分)。
在参加基于学校的哮喘教育计划的 4951 名青少年中,平均年龄为 10.75 岁。大约一半是男性和黑人。超过一半的人报告没有先前的哮喘教育(54.6%)。在基线时,重复参加者的知识水平明显高于首次参加者(平均值:7.45 与 5.92;p<0.001)。在计划结束后,首次参加者和重复参加者的知识均有显著提高(首次参加者:平均值=5.92◊9.32;p<0.001;重复参加者:平均值=7.45◊9.62;p<0.001)。
基于学校的哮喘教育对于提高哮喘知识是有效的。值得注意的是,学校中重复的哮喘教育可带来知识方面的额外收益。需要进一步研究来了解重复哮喘教育对发病率的影响。