Desilet Luke W, Pedro Sofia, Katz Patricia, Michaud Kaleb
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
FORWARD - The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025 Mar;77(3):412-418. doi: 10.1002/acr.25192. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
Rural residence has been associated with health disparities in rheumatic diseases and other chronic conditions in the United States. This study aimed to determine if a relationship exists between geographic residence and health care utilization outcomes for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) in a US-wide rheumatic disease registry.
Participants were in FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, a US-wide rheumatic disease longitudinal cohort completing questionnaires between 1999 and 2019. Health care utilization variables (ie, medical visits and diagnostic tests) from six-month questionnaires were analyzed by geographic categories (small rural/isolated, large rural, and urban). Double selection LASSO with Poisson regression was used to assess the best model when examining the association between health care utilization variables and geographic residence.
Among 37,802 participants with RA, urban residents were more likely than small rural residents to use in-person health care by most measures including physician visits and diagnostic tests. Urban residents reported more rheumatologist visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18-1.27) but fewer primary care visits (IRR 0.90; 95% CI 0.85-0.94). Among 8,248 participants with OA, urban residents were also more likely than rural residents to report health care utilization by most measures.
Individuals residing in urban areas were more likely than those in rural areas to report in-person health care utilization. Specifically, urban residents with RA were more likely to report rheumatologist visits, but less likely to report primary care visits. Less disparity existed in OA health care utilization, although an urban-rural disparity still existed by most measures.
在美国,农村居住情况与风湿性疾病及其他慢性病的健康差异有关。本研究旨在确定在美国范围内的风湿性疾病登记处,类风湿关节炎(RA)和骨关节炎(OA)患者的地理居住情况与医疗保健利用结果之间是否存在关联。
参与者来自美国风湿性疾病纵向队列研究“FORWARD:美国国家风湿性疾病数据库”,该队列在1999年至2019年期间完成问卷调查。通过地理类别(小农村/偏远地区、大农村和城市)分析来自六个月问卷调查的医疗保健利用变量(即就诊和诊断测试)。在检查医疗保健利用变量与地理居住情况之间的关联时,使用带泊松回归的双重选择套索法来评估最佳模型。
在37802名RA患者中,在大多数指标上,包括看医生和诊断测试,城市居民比小农村居民更有可能使用面对面医疗保健服务。城市居民报告的看风湿病医生次数更多(发病率比[IRR],1.22;95%置信区间[95%CI],1.18 - 1.27),但看初级保健医生的次数较少(IRR 0.90;95%CI 0.85 - 0.94)。在8248名OA患者中,在大多数指标上,城市居民也比农村居民更有可能报告医疗保健利用情况。
居住在城市地区的人比农村地区的人更有可能报告使用面对面医疗保健服务。具体而言,患有RA的城市居民更有可能报告看风湿病医生,但报告看初级保健医生的可能性较小。OA的医疗保健利用方面的差异较小,尽管在大多数指标上仍存在城乡差异。