Winstone Lizzy, Mars Becky, Haworth Claire M A, Heron Jon, Kidger Judi
Population Health Sciences, Medical School University of Bristol Bristol UK.
NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust Bristol UK.
JCPP Adv. 2022 Mar 10;2(2):e12071. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12071. eCollection 2022 Jun.
There is mixed evidence as to the effects of different types of social media use on mental health, but previous research has been platform-specific and has focused on an oversimplified distinction between active and passive use. This study aimed to identify different underlying subgroups of adolescent social media user based on their pattern of social media activities and test associations between user type and future mental health.
Students from 19 schools ( = 2456) in south-west England completed an online survey measuring 13 social media activities and four psychosocial outcomes (past year self-harm, depression, anxiety and poor well-being) at age 13 years (October 2019) and repeated a year later (October 2020; aged 14 years). Latent class analysis using Mplus identified distinct classes of social media user and stability of these classes was examined using latent transition analysis. A bias-adjusted three-step model was used to test associations between class membership at baseline and mental health at follow-up. Analyses were adjusted for gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, disability, social media screen-time and baseline mental health.
A four-class model of social media user at baseline was selected based on fit statistics and interpretability. User types were labelled High Communicators; Moderate Communicators; Broadcasters; and Minimal users. Users became more active over time. Broadcasters at age 13 had the poorest mental health outcomes at age 14, with mental health and well-being generally better among the High and Moderate Communicators.
Findings suggest that broadcasters-adolescents with high levels of content sharing in addition to messaging and browsing online-are most likely to be experiencing poor mental health a year later. Recommendations regarding social media use should expand to consider different user types, and mental health implications of their engagement with different online activities in addition to screen-time.
关于不同类型社交媒体使用对心理健康的影响,证据不一,但以往研究针对特定平台,且侧重于对主动使用和被动使用进行过于简单的区分。本研究旨在根据青少年社交媒体活动模式识别不同的潜在亚组用户,并测试用户类型与未来心理健康之间的关联。
来自英格兰西南部19所学校(n = 2456)的学生在13岁时(2019年10月)完成了一项在线调查,该调查测量了13种社交媒体活动以及四种心理社会结果(过去一年的自我伤害、抑郁、焦虑和幸福感差),并在一年后(2020年10月;14岁)重复进行。使用Mplus进行潜在类别分析以识别不同的社交媒体用户类别,并使用潜在转换分析检查这些类别的稳定性。采用偏差调整的三步模型来测试基线时的类别归属与随访时的心理健康之间的关联。分析对性别、种族、性取向、社会经济地位、残疾、社交媒体屏幕使用时间和基线心理健康进行了调整。
根据拟合统计量和可解释性,选择了基线时的四类社交媒体用户模型。用户类型被标记为高交流者;中等交流者;广播者;以及极少使用者。随着时间推移,用户变得更加活跃。13岁时的广播者在14岁时心理健康结果最差,高交流者和中等交流者的心理健康和幸福感总体较好。
研究结果表明,广播者——除了在线消息传递和浏览之外还大量分享内容的青少年——最有可能在一年后出现心理健康不佳的情况。关于社交媒体使用的建议应扩展到考虑不同的用户类型,以及除屏幕使用时间外他们参与不同在线活动对心理健康的影响。