• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单片与分开服用降压三联复方制剂的依从性及相关心血管结局。

Adherence and related cardiovascular outcomes to single pill vs. separate pill administration of antihypertensive triple-combination therapy.

机构信息

National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology.

Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2023 Sep 1;41(9):1466-1473. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003497. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003497
PMID:37432906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10399952/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare adherence to antihypertensive treatment between patients prescribed a three-drug single-pill combination (SPC) of perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide (P/A/I) vs. the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), a calcium-channel blocker (CCB), and a diuretic (D) as a two-drug SPC plus a third drug given separately.

METHODS

Using the healthcare utilization database of the Lombardy Region (Italy), the 28 210 patients, aged at least 40 years, who were prescribed P/A/I SPC during 2015-2018 were identified and the date of the first prescription was defined as the index date. For each patient prescribed the SPC, a comparator who started ACEI/CCB/D treatment as a two-pill combination was considered. Adherence to the triple combination was assessed over the year after the index date as the proportion of the follow-up days covered by prescription (PDC). Patients who had a PDC >75% were defined as highly adherent to drug therapy. Log-binomial regression models were fitted to estimate the risk ratio of treatment adherence in relation to the drug treatment strategy.

RESULTS

About 59 and 25% of SPC and two-pill combination users showed high adherence, respectively. Compared with patients under a three-drug two-pill combination, those who were treated with the three-drug SPC had a higher propensity to be highly adherent to the triple combination (2.38, 95% confidence interval: 2.32-2.44). This was the case regardless of the sex, age, comorbidities, and number of co-treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-life setting, patients under three-drug SPC exhibited more frequently a high adherence to antihypertensive treatment than those prescribed a three-drug two-pill combination.

摘要

目的

比较处方中含有培哚普利/氨氯地平/吲达帕胺(P/A/I)的三药单片复方制剂(SPC)与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)和利尿剂(D)二药 SPC 加单独给予的第三种药物联合治疗的患者之间的降压治疗依从性。

方法

使用意大利伦巴第大区(意大利)的医疗保健利用数据库,确定了 2015-2018 年期间处方 P/A/I SPC 的至少 40 岁的 28210 名患者,将首次处方日期定义为索引日期。对于每个处方 SPC 的患者,考虑了开始 ACEI/CCB/D 二药联合治疗的对照者。将索引日期后一年的随访天数占处方天数(PDC)的比例评估作为三重联合治疗的依从性。PDC>75%的患者被定义为对药物治疗高度依从。使用对数二项式回归模型估计药物治疗策略与治疗依从性之间的风险比。

结果

SPC 和二药联合使用者的高依从率分别约为 59%和 25%。与接受三药二药联合治疗的患者相比,接受三药 SPC 治疗的患者对三联治疗的高度依从性更高(2.38,95%置信区间:2.32-2.44)。无论性别、年龄、合并症和联合治疗数量如何,均如此。

结论

在真实环境中,接受三药 SPC 治疗的患者比接受三药二药联合治疗的患者更频繁地表现出对降压治疗的高度依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c18/10399952/388b62485daf/jhype-41-1466-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c18/10399952/17f935d704e5/jhype-41-1466-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c18/10399952/233dd9b89d2e/jhype-41-1466-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c18/10399952/3f306163e414/jhype-41-1466-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c18/10399952/388b62485daf/jhype-41-1466-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c18/10399952/17f935d704e5/jhype-41-1466-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c18/10399952/233dd9b89d2e/jhype-41-1466-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c18/10399952/3f306163e414/jhype-41-1466-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c18/10399952/388b62485daf/jhype-41-1466-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Adherence and related cardiovascular outcomes to single pill vs. separate pill administration of antihypertensive triple-combination therapy.单片与分开服用降压三联复方制剂的依从性及相关心血管结局。
J Hypertens. 2023 Sep 1;41(9):1466-1473. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003497. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
2
A real-world analysis of outcomes and healthcare costs of patients on perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill vs. multiple-pill combination in Italy.在意大利,对培哚普利/吲达帕胺/氨氯地平单片与多片联合治疗的患者的实际结局和医疗成本进行的分析。
J Hypertens. 2024 Jan 1;42(1):136-142. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003570. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
3
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 1;2014(2):CD008117. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008117.pub2.
4
Cochrane in context: pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.Cochrane背景下:儿童高血压的药物干预
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):581-3. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1975.
5
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):498-580. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1974.
6
Adherence to Triple Single-Pill Combination of Perindopril/Indapamide/Amlodipine: Findings from Real-World Analysis in Italy.依那普利/吲达帕胺/氨氯地平三联单片复方制剂在意大利真实世界分析中的依从性。
Adv Ther. 2023 Apr;40(4):1765-1772. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02451-y. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
7
Impact of single-pill combinations versus free-equivalent combinations on adherence and persistence in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.单片复方制剂与自由等效复方制剂对高血压和血脂异常患者依从性和持久性的影响:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Sep;24(7):817-827. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2293199. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
8
Efficacy of single-pill combination in uncontrolled essential hypertension: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.单药复方制剂治疗未控制的原发性高血压的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Aug;46(8):886-898. doi: 10.1002/clc.24082. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
9
Effectiveness of Switching from Multiple-Inhaler to Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD in a Real-World Setting in Japan.在日本真实世界环境中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者从多吸入器治疗转换为每日一次单吸入器三联疗法的有效性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Mar 8;20:565-580. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S478455. eCollection 2025.
10
Beta-blockers for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Therapeutic Adherence and Reducing Therapeutic Inertia in the Management of People with Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Call-to-Action from the Middle East.改善心血管代谢疾病患者管理中的治疗依从性并减少治疗惰性:来自中东的行动呼吁。
Adv Ther. 2025 Mar;42(3):1340-1359. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03103-5. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
Medication Changes After Renal Denervation: Current Evidence and Patient Perspectives.肾去神经支配术后的药物变化:当前证据及患者观点
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):e037187. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037187. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
3
Cost-effectiveness of single-pill and separate-pill administration of antihypertensive triple combination therapy: a population-based microsimulation study.
基于人群的微观模拟研究:降压三联复方单片与分药治疗的成本效果比较。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 6;24(1):1808. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19346-4.
4
Pharmacokinetic Comparison of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Candesartan Cilexetil/Amlodipine/Atorvastatin Versus Co-administration of Individual Formulations in Healthy Participants.坎地沙坦西酯/氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀固定剂量复方与各单方制剂合用在健康受试者中的药代动力学比较。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jul;41(7):2808-2825. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02869-y. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Participants' views of ultra-low dose combination therapy for high blood pressure: a mixed-methods study from the QUARTET trial.参与者对超低剂量联合治疗高血压的看法:QUARTET 试验的混合方法研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2024 Jun;38(6):516-522. doi: 10.1038/s41371-024-00915-4. Epub 2024 May 14.