Suppr超能文献

基于参考和无参考转录组分析的菊头蝠属不同种群耳蜗转录组的差异。

Divergence of cochlear transcriptomics between reference‑based and reference‑free transcriptome analyses among Rhinolophus ferrumequinum populations.

机构信息

Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resource Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, China.

Department of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 11;18(7):e0288404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288404. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Differences in gene expression within tissues can lead to differences in tissue function. Understanding the transcriptome of a species helps elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypic divergence. According to the presence or absence of a reference genome of for a studied species, transcriptome analyses can be divided into reference‑based and reference‑free methods, respectively. Presently, comparisons of complete transcriptome analysis results between those two methods are still rare. In this study, we compared the cochlear transcriptome analysis results of greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) from three lineages in China with different acoustic phenotypes using reference‑based and reference‑free methods to explore their differences in subsequent analysis. The results gained by reference-based results had lower false-positive rates and were more accurate because differentially expressed genes among the three populations obtained by this method had greater reliability and a higher annotation rate. Some phenotype-related enrichment terms, including those related to inorganic molecules and proton transmembrane channels, were also obtained only by the reference-based method. However, the reference‑based method might have the limitation of incomplete information acquisition. Thus, we believe that a combination of reference‑free and reference‑based methods is ideal for transcriptome analyses. The results of our study provided a reference for the selection of transcriptome analysis methods in the future.

摘要

组织内基因表达的差异会导致组织功能的不同。了解物种的转录组有助于阐明表型分化的分子机制。根据研究物种是否有参考基因组,转录组分析可以分别分为基于参考和无参考的方法。目前,这两种方法的完整转录组分析结果之间的比较仍然很少。在这项研究中,我们使用基于参考和无参考的方法,比较了中国三个谱系具有不同声学表型的大马蹄蝠(Rhinolophus ferrumequinum)的耳蜗转录组分析结果,以探讨它们在后续分析中的差异。基于参考的结果得到的假阳性率更低,更准确,因为该方法获得的三个群体之间差异表达的基因具有更高的可靠性和更高的注释率。一些与表型相关的富集术语,包括与无机分子和质子跨膜通道相关的术语,也只能通过基于参考的方法获得。然而,基于参考的方法可能存在信息获取不完全的局限性。因此,我们认为,无参考和基于参考的方法相结合是转录组分析的理想选择。我们的研究结果为未来转录组分析方法的选择提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2795/10335675/3ca2c0704a8a/pone.0288404.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验