• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健家庭医生在定性和混合评价中临床整合的经验:系统评价方案。

Primary care family physicians' experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (C2E2), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 11;13(7):e067576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067576.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067576
PMID:37433736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10347507/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clinical (service) integration in primary care settings describes how comprehensive care is coordinated by family physicians (FPs) over time across healthcare contexts to meet patient care needs. To improve care integration and healthcare service planning, a systematic approach to understanding its numerous influencing factors is paramount. The objective of this study is to generate a comprehensive map of FP-perceived factors influencing clinical integration across diseases and patient demographics.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We developed the protocol with the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review methodology framework. An information specialist built search strategies for MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases using keywords and MeSH terms iteratively collected from a multidisciplinary team. Two reviewers will work independently throughout the study process, from article selection to data analysis. The identified records will be screened by title and abstract and reviewed in the full text against the criteria: FP in primary care (population), clinical integration (concept) and qualitative and mixed reviews published in 2011-2021 (context). We will first describe the characteristics of the review studies. Then, we will extract qualitative, FP-perceived factors and group them by content similarities, such as patient factors. Lastly, we will describe the types of extracted factors using a custom framework.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required for a systematic review. The identified factors will help generate an item bank for a survey that will be developed in the Phase II study to ascertain high-impact factors for intervention(s), as well as evidence gaps to guide future research. We will share the study findings with various knowledge users to promote awareness of clinical integration issues through multiple channels: publications and conferences for researchers and care providers, an executive summary for clinical leaders and policy-makers, and social media for the public.

摘要

简介

临床(服务)整合是指家庭医生(FPs)在一段时间内通过跨越医疗保健环境的协调,提供综合护理以满足患者的护理需求。为了改善医疗服务整合和规划,了解其众多影响因素的系统方法至关重要。本研究的目的是生成一张全面的图表,展示影响跨疾病和患者人群的临床整合的 FP 感知因素。

方法和分析

我们在 Joanna Briggs 研究所系统评价方法框架的指导下制定了方案。一名信息专家使用多学科团队迭代收集的关键词和 MeSH 术语为 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库构建了搜索策略。两名评审员将在整个研究过程中独立工作,从文章选择到数据分析。将通过标题和摘要筛选确定的记录,并根据以下标准在全文中进行审查:初级保健中的 FP(人群)、临床整合(概念)以及 2011-2021 年发表的定性和混合评论(背景)。我们将首先描述综述研究的特征。然后,我们将提取定性的、FP 感知的因素,并根据内容相似性(例如患者因素)对其进行分组。最后,我们将使用自定义框架描述提取因素的类型。

伦理和传播

系统评价不需要伦理批准。确定的因素将有助于为第二阶段研究开发的调查生成一个项目库,以确定干预的高影响因素,以及指导未来研究的证据差距。我们将通过多种渠道与各种知识用户分享研究结果,以提高对临床整合问题的认识:为研究人员和护理提供者发布出版物和会议,为临床领导和决策者编写执行摘要,以及为公众发布社交媒体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10347507/1bd302b8d530/bmjopen-2022-067576f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10347507/b3c6a10da3ff/bmjopen-2022-067576f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10347507/1bd302b8d530/bmjopen-2022-067576f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10347507/b3c6a10da3ff/bmjopen-2022-067576f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10347507/1bd302b8d530/bmjopen-2022-067576f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Primary care family physicians' experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol.初级保健家庭医生在定性和混合评价中临床整合的经验:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 11;13(7):e067576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067576.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping Evidence and Constructing an Analytic Framework: An Umbrella Review Summarizing Primary Care Family Physicians' Experiences With Clinical Integration.梳理证据并构建分析框架:一项概述基层医疗家庭医生临床整合经验的伞状综述
Ann Fam Med. 2025 Jul 28;23(4):350-362. doi: 10.1370/afm.240118.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
Competencies to promote collaboration between primary and secondary care doctors: an integrative review.促进初级保健医生和二级保健医生合作的能力:综合评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 2;21(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01234-6.
3
Patient Outcomes Following Interhospital Care Fragmentation: A Systematic Review.患者在医院间转诊后的结局:一项系统综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1550-1558. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05366-z. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
4
Management of depression and referral of older people to psychological therapies: a systematic review of qualitative studies.老年人抑郁管理和心理治疗转介:定性研究的系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Mar;69(680):e171-e181. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701297. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
5
What are the most common conditions in primary care? Systematic review.基层医疗中最常见的病症有哪些?系统综述。
Can Fam Physician. 2018 Nov;64(11):832-840.
6
Exploring Rural Family Physicians' Challenges in Providing Dementia Care: A Qualitative Study.探索乡村家庭医生在提供痴呆症护理方面的挑战:一项定性研究。
Can J Aging. 2018 Dec;37(4):390-399. doi: 10.1017/S0714980818000417.
7
Finding the Integrated Care Evidence Base in PubMed and Beyond: A Bibliometric Study of the Challenges.在PubMed及其他数据库中寻找综合护理证据库:一项关于挑战的文献计量学研究
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Aug 17;18(3):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3975.
8
Practice-, Provider-, and Patient-level interventions to improve preventive care: Development of the P3 Model.改善预防保健的实践、提供者和患者层面干预措施:P3模型的开发。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Jun 18;11:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.06.009. eCollection 2018 Sep.
9
Current Weight Management Approaches Used by Primary Care Providers in Six Multidisciplinary Healthcare Settings in Ontario.安大略省六个多学科医疗保健机构中初级保健提供者目前采用的体重管理方法。
Can J Nurs Res. 2018 Dec;50(4):169-178. doi: 10.1177/0844562118769229. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
10
A Definition of Family Medicine and General Practice.家庭医学与全科医疗的定义。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018 Jan;28(1):76-77. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.01.76.