Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Dvorkin Lounge Mailroom, 2G2 Walter C. Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, 8440 - 112 ST NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7933-7939. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10250-3. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
The management of early-stage esophageal cancer is nuanced. A multidisciplinary approach may optimize management through selection of candidates for surgical or endoscopic therapies. The objective of this research was to examine long-term outcomes of patients with early-stage esophageal cancer who undergo treatment with endoscopic resection or surgery.
Data on patient demographics, co-morbidities, pathology results, OS and RFS were obtained for both the endoscopic resection group and esophagectomy group. Univariate analysis of OS and RFS were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method with calculation of the log-rank test. Multivariate cox-proportional hazards models were created for OS and RFS using a hypothesis-driven approach. A multivariate logistic regression model was created to identify predictors of esophagectomy among patients undergoing initial endoscopic resection.
A total of 111 patients were included. The median OS for the surgery group was 67.0 months compared to 74.0 months in the endoscopic resection group (log-rank p = 0.93). The median RFS for the surgery group was 109.4 months compared to 63.3 months in the endoscopic resection group (log-rank p = 0.0127). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing endoscopic resection had significantly worse RFS (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.09-6.00; p = 0.032), but equivalent OS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.46-2.32; p = 0.941), compared to patients undergoing esophagectomy. High-grade disease (OR 5.43, 95% CI 1.13-26.10; p = 0.035) and submucosal involvement (OR 7.75, 95% CI 1.90-31.40; p = 0.004) were identified as significant predictors of proceeding to esophagectomy.
Through a multidisciplinary approach, patients with early-stage esophageal cancer achieve excellent RFS and OS. Submucosal involvement and high-grade disease place patients at increased risk for local disease recurrence; these patients may undergo endoscopic resection safely if treated with a multidisciplinary approach incorporating endoscopic surveillance and surgical consultation. Further risk-stratification models may enable better patient selection and optimization of long-term outcomes.
早期食管癌的治疗需要综合考虑多种因素。多学科治疗方法可以通过选择手术或内镜治疗的候选患者来优化治疗。本研究的目的是评估接受内镜下切除术或手术治疗的早期食管癌患者的长期预后。
收集内镜下切除术组和食管切除术组患者的人口统计学、合并症、病理结果、总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)等数据。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法进行单因素 OS 和 RFS 分析,并进行对数秩检验。采用假设驱动的方法,创建多变量 Cox 比例风险模型进行 OS 和 RFS 分析。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来识别初始接受内镜下切除术的患者中进行食管切除术的预测因素。
共纳入 111 例患者。手术组的中位 OS 为 67.0 个月,内镜下切除术组为 74.0 个月(对数秩检验,p=0.93)。手术组的中位 RFS 为 109.4 个月,内镜下切除术组为 63.3 个月(对数秩检验,p=0.0127)。多变量分析显示,内镜下切除术组患者的 RFS 显著较差(HR 2.55,95%CI 1.09-6.00;p=0.032),而 OS 无显著差异(HR 1.03,95%CI 0.46-2.32;p=0.941)。高级别病变(OR 5.43,95%CI 1.13-26.10;p=0.035)和黏膜下浸润(OR 7.75,95%CI 1.90-31.40;p=0.004)是行食管切除术的显著预测因素。
通过多学科治疗,早期食管癌患者可获得良好的 RFS 和 OS。黏膜下浸润和高级别病变使患者局部疾病复发风险增加;如果采用多学科治疗方法,包括内镜监测和手术咨询,这些患者可以安全地接受内镜下切除术。进一步的风险分层模型可能有助于更好地选择患者并优化长期预后。