• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过实施智能产时监测系统降低首次剖宫产率

Reducing primary cesarean delivery rate through implementation of a smart intrapartum surveillance system.

作者信息

Cheng Po Jen, Cheng You Hung, Shaw Steven S W, Jang Hung Chi

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jul 11;6(1):126. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00867-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-023-00867-y
PMID:37433963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10336068/
Abstract

The rapid changes in clinical maternity situations that occur in a labor and delivery unit can lead to unpredictable maternal and newborn morbidities. Cesarean section (CS) rate is a key indicator of the accessibility and quality of a labor and delivery unit. This retrospective cross-sectional study assesses the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) cesarean delivery rates before and after the implementation of a smart intrapartum surveillance system. Research data were collected from the electronic medical records of a labor and delivery unit. The primary outcome was the CS rate of the NTSV population. The data of 3648 women admitted for delivery were analyzed. Of the studied deliveries, 1760 and 1888 occurred during the preimplementation and postimplementation periods, respectively. The CS rate for the NTSV population was 31.0% and 23.3% during the preimplementation and postimplementation periods, respectively, indicating a significant 24.7% (p = 0.014) reduction in CS rate after the implementation of the smart intrapartum surveillance system (relative risk, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.80). In the NTSV population, the vaginal and CS birth groups, no significant difference in terms of newborn weight, neonatal Apgar scores, composite neonatal adverse outcome indicator, and the occurrence of the following: neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal meconium aspiration, chorioamnionitis, shoulder dystocia, perineal laceration, placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, maternal blood transfusion, and hysterectomy before and after the implementation of the smart intrapartum surveillance system. This study reveals that the use of the smart intrapartum surveillance system can effectively reduce the primary CS rate for low-risk NTSV pregnancies without significantly affecting perinatal outcomes.

摘要

分娩单元中临床产科情况的快速变化可能导致不可预测的孕产妇和新生儿发病情况。剖宫产(CS)率是分娩单元可及性和质量的关键指标。这项回顾性横断面研究评估了智能产时监测系统实施前后初产妇、足月、单胎、头位(NTSV)剖宫产率。研究数据从一个分娩单元的电子病历中收集。主要结局是NTSV人群的CS率。对3648名入院分娩的女性数据进行了分析。在所研究的分娩中,分别有1760例和1888例发生在实施前和实施后阶段。NTSV人群的CS率在实施前和实施后阶段分别为31.0%和23.3%,表明智能产时监测系统实施后CS率显著降低了24.7%(p = 0.014)(相对风险,0.75;95%置信区间,0.71 - 0.80)。在NTSV人群的阴道分娩和剖宫产分娩组中,智能产时监测系统实施前后在新生儿体重、新生儿阿氏评分、综合新生儿不良结局指标以及以下情况的发生率方面无显著差异:新生儿重症监护病房入院、新生儿胎粪吸入、绒毛膜羊膜炎、肩难产、会阴裂伤、胎盘早剥、产后出血、产妇输血和子宫切除术。本研究表明,使用智能产时监测系统可有效降低低风险NTSV妊娠的首次剖宫产率,而不会显著影响围产期结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2556/10336068/bff6708f324f/41746_2023_867_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2556/10336068/085375a4d4e5/41746_2023_867_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2556/10336068/91d7205dc7a9/41746_2023_867_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2556/10336068/074c719ffc81/41746_2023_867_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2556/10336068/bff6708f324f/41746_2023_867_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2556/10336068/085375a4d4e5/41746_2023_867_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2556/10336068/91d7205dc7a9/41746_2023_867_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2556/10336068/074c719ffc81/41746_2023_867_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2556/10336068/bff6708f324f/41746_2023_867_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reducing primary cesarean delivery rate through implementation of a smart intrapartum surveillance system.通过实施智能产时监测系统降低首次剖宫产率
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jul 11;6(1):126. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00867-y.
2
Duration of labor induction in nulliparous women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and maternal and neonatal outcomes.初产妇妊娠高血压疾病的引产持续时间与母婴结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Oct;35(20):3964-3971. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1844658. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Impact of cesarean delivery due to maternal choice on perinatal outcome in term nulliparous patients with a singleton fetus in a vertex presentation.因产妇选择行剖宫产术对足月、初产、头位单胎妊娠围产结局的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Nov;35(21):4156-4161. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1847078. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Shoulder dystocia and composite adverse outcomes for the maternal-neonatal dyad.肩难产与母婴不良结局的复合结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jul;3(4):100359. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100359. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
5
Quality Improvement Initiatives Lead to Reduction in Nulliparous Term Singleton Vertex Cesarean Delivery Rate.质量改进措施导致初产妇足月单胎头位剖宫产率降低。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Feb;43(2):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
6
Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California.加利福尼亚州初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率的医院质量改进干预措施、全州政策倡议
JAMA. 2021 Apr 27;325(16):1631-1639. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3816.
7
The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes.延长第二产程以预防初次剖宫产对母婴结局的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;220(2):191.e1-191.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
8
Defining the upper limit of the second stage of labor in nulliparous patients.定义初产妇第二产程的上限。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 Aug;1(3):100029. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100029. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
9
Maternal Morbidity and Birth Satisfaction After Implementation of a Validated Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery During Labor Induction.产妇在分娩诱导期间使用经过验证的剖宫产计算器后的发病率和分娩满意度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2025582. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25582.
10
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.39周选择性剖宫产:对肩难产、胎儿创伤、新生儿脑病及胎儿宫内死亡的影响
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge-based, computerized, patient clinical decision support system for perioperative pain, nausea and constipation management: a clinical feasibility study.基于知识的、计算机化的、用于围手术期疼痛、恶心和便秘管理的患者临床决策支持系统:一项临床可行性研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Aug;38(4):907-913. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01148-z. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
2
In-Depth Analysis of Caesarean Section Rate in the Largest Secondary Care-Level Maternity Hospital in Latvia.拉脱维亚最大的二级护理水平妇产医院剖宫产率的深入分析。
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 9;12(19):6426. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196426.

本文引用的文献

1
The need for feminist intersectionality in digital health.数字健康领域需要女权主义的交叉性。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Aug;3(8):e526-e533. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00118-7.
2
Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California.加利福尼亚州初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率的医院质量改进干预措施、全州政策倡议
JAMA. 2021 Apr 27;325(16):1631-1639. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3816.
3
The development of the WHO Labour Care Guide: an international survey of maternity care providers.
世卫组织劳工保健指南的制定:产妇保健提供者国际调查。
Reprod Health. 2021 Mar 22;18(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01074-2.
4
A composite neonatal adverse outcome indicator using population-based data: an update.一项利用基于人群的数据的综合新生儿不良结局指标:最新情况
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Aug 12;5(1):1337. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1337.
5
Digital Health-The Need to Assess Benefits, Risks, and Value.数字健康——评估益处、风险和价值的必要性。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 12;325(2):127-128. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22919.
6
Computational medicine, present and the future: obstetrics and gynecology perspective.计算医学,现在和未来:妇产科视角。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):16-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.057. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
7
Variation of intrapartum care and cesarean rates among practitioners attending births of low-risk, nulliparous women.低危初产妇分娩中不同从业者的产时照护和剖宫产率变化。
Birth. 2020 Jun;47(2):227-236. doi: 10.1111/birt.12483. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects.数字药丸:实证文献的范围综述及伦理方面的分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jan 8;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0443-1.
9
Validation of a statistical toolkit based on the ten-group Robson Classification of cesarean delivery.基于剖宫产术的十组 Robson 分类的统计工具包的验证。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Apr;149(1):71-75. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13091. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
10
Complications of Cesarean Birth: Clinical Recommendations for Prevention and Management.剖宫产术并发症:预防和处理的临床建议。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2020 Mar/Apr;45(2):92-99. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000598.