Zhao Yingliang, Che Yanyun, Liu Qiming, Zhou Shenghua, Xiao Yichao
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2023 Jun 26;17:1073538. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1073538. eCollection 2023.
To explore the role of m6A regulatory genes in atrial fibrillation (AF), we classified atrial fibrillation patients into subtypes by two genotyping methods associated with m6A regulatory genes and explored their clinical significance.
We downloaded datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The m6A regulatory gene expression levels were extracted. We constructed and compared random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models. Feature genes were selected to develop a nomogram model with the superior model. We identified m6A subtypes based on significantly differentially expressed m6A regulatory genes and identified m6A gene subtypes based on m6A-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Comprehensive evaluation of the two m6A modification patterns was performed.
The data of 107 samples from three datasets, GSE115574, GSE14975 and GSE41177, were acquired from the GEO database for training models, comprising 65 AF samples and 42 sinus rhythm (SR) samples. The data of 26 samples from dataset GSE79768 comprising 14 AF samples and 12 SR samples were acquired from the GEO database for external validation. The expression levels of 23 regulatory genes of m6A were extracted. There were correlations among the m6A readers, erasers, and writers. Five feature m6A regulatory genes, ZC3H13, YTHDF1, HNRNPA2B1, IGFBP2, and IGFBP3, were determined ( < 0.05) to establish a nomogram model that can predict the incidence of atrial fibrillation with the RF model. We identified two m6A subtypes based on the five significant m6A regulatory genes ( < 0.05). Cluster B had a lower immune infiltration of immature dendritic cells than cluster A ( < 0.05). On the basis of six m6A-related DEGs between m6A subtypes ( < 0.05), two m6A gene subtypes were identified. Both cluster A and gene cluster A scored higher than the other clusters in terms of m6A score computed by principal component analysis (PCA) algorithms ( < 0.05). The m6A subtypes and m6A gene subtypes were highly consistent.
The m6A regulatory genes play non-negligible roles in atrial fibrillation. A nomogram model developed by five feature m6A regulatory genes could be used to predict the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Two m6A modification patterns were identified and evaluated comprehensively, which may provide insights into the classification of atrial fibrillation patients and guide treatment.
为探究m6A调控基因在心房颤动(AF)中的作用,我们通过两种与m6A调控基因相关的基因分型方法将心房颤动患者分为不同亚型,并探讨其临床意义。
我们从基因表达综合数据库(GEO)下载数据集。提取m6A调控基因的表达水平。我们构建并比较了随机森林(RF)模型和支持向量机(SVM)模型。选择特征基因与性能更优的模型一起构建列线图模型。我们基于显著差异表达的m6A调控基因鉴定出m6A亚型,并基于与m6A相关的差异表达基因(DEG)鉴定出m6A基因亚型。对两种m6A修饰模式进行综合评估。
从GEO数据库获取来自三个数据集GSE115574、GSE14975和GSE41177的107个样本的数据用于训练模型,其中包括65个AF样本和42个窦性心律(SR)样本。从GEO数据库获取来自数据集GSE79768的26个样本的数据用于外部验证,其中包括14个AF样本和12个SR样本。提取了23个m6A调控基因的表达水平。m6A的读取器、擦除器和写入器之间存在相关性。确定了五个特征性m6A调控基因,即ZC3H13、YTHDF1、HNRNPA2B1、IGFBP2和IGFBP3(<0.05),以建立一个可通过RF模型预测心房颤动发生率的列线图模型。我们基于五个显著的m6A调控基因(<0.05)鉴定出两种m6A亚型。B簇未成熟树突状细胞的免疫浸润低于A簇(<0.05)。基于m6A亚型之间六个与m6A相关的DEG(<0.05),鉴定出两种m6A基因亚型。在通过主成分分析(PCA)算法计算的m6A评分方面,A簇和基因簇A的得分均高于其他簇(<0.05)。m6A亚型和m6A基因亚型高度一致。
m6A调控基因在心房颤动中发挥着不可忽视的作用。由五个特征性m6A调控基因构建的列线图模型可用于预测心房颤动的发生率。鉴定并综合评估了两种m6A修饰模式,这可能为心房颤动患者分类及治疗提供指导。