• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过集体就诊增加专科护理可及性:危机后精神病诊所试点总结

Increasing access to specialist care with group medical visits: summary of a pilot in a post-crisis psychiatric clinic.

作者信息

Palay Josh, Bolton James M, Sareen Jitender, Hensel Jennifer M

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2023 Jun 26;3:1127725. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1127725. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/frhs.2023.1127725
PMID:37435511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10332818/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Group medical visits (GMVs) have strong evidence of acceptability and effectiveness in the management of chronic medical diseases. Adaptation of GMVs for psychiatric care has potential to increase access, decrease stigma and save costs. Despite promise, this model has not been widely adopted.

METHODS

A novel GMV pilot was implemented for psychiatric care post-crisis among patients with primary mood or anxiety disorders who required medication management. Participants filled out PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scales at each visit in order to track their progress. After discharge, charts were reviewed for demographics, medication changes and symptom changes. Patient characteristics were compared between those who attended and those who didn't. Changes in total PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores among attendees were assessed with paired -tests.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were enrolled between October 2017 and the end of December 2018, 41 of whom consented to participate. Of those, 10 did not attend, 8 attended but did not complete, and 23 completed. Baseline PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores did not differ significantly between groups. Significant and meaningful reductions in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores from baseline to last visit attended occurred among those who attended at least 1 visit (decrease of 5.13 and 5.26 points, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This GMV pilot demonstrated feasibility of the model as well as positive outcomes for patients recruited in a post-crisis setting. This model has the potential to increase access to psychiatric care in the face of limited resources, however the failure of the pilot to sustain highlights challenges to be addressed in future pivots.

摘要

背景

小组医疗就诊(GMV)在慢性疾病管理方面具有很强的可接受性和有效性证据。将GMV应用于精神科护理有可能增加就医机会、减少耻辱感并节省成本。尽管有前景,但该模式尚未得到广泛采用。

方法

针对需要药物管理的原发性情绪或焦虑症患者,在危机后实施了一项新型GMV试点项目用于精神科护理。参与者在每次就诊时填写PHQ-9和GAD-7量表,以跟踪他们的进展。出院后,审查病历以了解人口统计学信息、药物变化和症状变化。比较参加者和未参加者的患者特征。使用配对t检验评估参加者中PHQ-9和GAD-7总分的变化。

结果

2017年10月至2018年12月底共招募了48名患者,其中41名同意参与。其中,10名未参加,8名参加但未完成,23名完成。各组之间的基线PHQ-9和GAD-7得分无显著差异。至少参加过1次就诊的患者从基线到最后一次就诊时,PHQ-9和GAD-7得分有显著且有意义的降低(分别降低5.13分和5.26分)。

结论

该GMV试点项目证明了该模式的可行性以及对危机后环境中招募的患者的积极结果。面对资源有限的情况,该模式有可能增加精神科护理的可及性,然而试点项目未能持续开展凸显了未来转型中需要解决的挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7b/10332818/f67530051358/frhs-03-1127725-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7b/10332818/6280bc5f80f9/frhs-03-1127725-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7b/10332818/f67530051358/frhs-03-1127725-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7b/10332818/6280bc5f80f9/frhs-03-1127725-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7b/10332818/f67530051358/frhs-03-1127725-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Increasing access to specialist care with group medical visits: summary of a pilot in a post-crisis psychiatric clinic.通过集体就诊增加专科护理可及性:危机后精神病诊所试点总结
Front Health Serv. 2023 Jun 26;3:1127725. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1127725. eCollection 2023.
2
Reducing severity of comorbid psychiatric symptoms in an epilepsy clinic using a colocation model: results of a pilot intervention.采用同地办公模式降低癫痫诊所共病精神症状的严重程度:一项试点干预的结果
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Oct;39:92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
3
Mindfulness-Based Group Medical Visits in Primary Care for Stress and Anxiety: An Observational Study.基于正念的初级保健中用于压力和焦虑的团体医疗访视:一项观察性研究。
J Integr Complement Med. 2022 Sep;28(9):721-728. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2021.0329. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
Behavioural activation therapy for post-stroke depression: the BEADS feasibility RCT.行为激活疗法治疗脑卒中后抑郁:BEADS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(47):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta23470.
5
6
Exercise as medicine-the use of group medical visits to promote physical activity and treat chronic moderate depression: a preliminary 14-week pre-post study.运动即良药——利用团体医疗就诊促进身体活动并治疗慢性中度抑郁症:一项为期14周的前后对照初步研究。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2015 Nov 2;1(1):e000036. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000036. eCollection 2015.
7
Improving Access to Integrative Oncology Through Group Medical Visits: A Pilot Implementation Project.通过团体医疗访视改善肿瘤整合照护的可及性:一项试点实施项目。
J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Jul;25(7):733-739. doi: 10.1089/acm.2019.0073.
8
User characteristics and outcomes from a national digital mental health service: an observational study of registrants of the Australian MindSpot Clinic.用户特征和全国数字心理健康服务的结果:澳大利亚 MindSpot 诊所注册者的观察性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Nov;2(11):e582-e593. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30224-7. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
9
Immediate Mood Scaler: Tracking Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Novel Mobile Mood Scale.即时情绪量表:使用新型移动情绪量表追踪抑郁和焦虑症状
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Apr 12;5(4):e44. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6544.
10
Exploring the relationship between generalised anxiety/depression scales and asthma-specific quality of life/control questionnaires in a specialist asthma clinic.探讨在专科哮喘诊所中广泛性焦虑/抑郁量表与哮喘特定生活质量/控制问卷之间的关系。
J Asthma. 2021 Jul;58(7):912-920. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1744640. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconceptualising the treatment gap for common mental disorders: a fork in the road for global mental health?重新概念化常见精神障碍的治疗差距:全球心理健康的分岔口?
Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;221(3):553-557. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.221.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of shared medical appointments in primary care for the management of long-term conditions: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.实施以初级保健为基础的共同医疗预约制以管理长期疾病的障碍和促进因素:系统回顾和定性研究的综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 24;11(8):e046842. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046842.
3
Virtual Group Visits: Hope for Improving Chronic Disease Management in Primary Care During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.
虚拟小组就诊:COVID-19大流行期间及之后改善初级保健中慢性病管理的希望
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Sep;35(7):904-907. doi: 10.1177/08901171211012543. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
4
Group Medical Visits and Clinician Wellbeing.团体医疗就诊与临床医生的健康状况
Glob Adv Health Med. 2020 Nov 18;9:2164956120973979. doi: 10.1177/2164956120973979. eCollection 2020.
5
Challenges and Opportunities to Meet the Mental Health Needs of Underserved and Disenfranchised Populations in the United States.满足美国弱势群体心理健康需求所面临的挑战与机遇
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2020 Jan;18(1):16-24. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190028. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
6
Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review.共病诊疗预约和以患者为中心的体验:一项混合方法系统评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jul 8;20(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0972-1.
7
PROCESS AND SYSTEMS: A systems approach to embedding group consultations in the NHS.流程与系统:一种将团体咨询融入英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的系统方法。
Future Healthc J. 2019 Feb;6(1):8-16. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-8.
8
Innovative Models in Mental Health Delivery Systems: Task Sharing Care with Non-specialist Providers to Close the Mental Health Treatment Gap.精神卫生服务系统中的创新模式:通过分担任务,利用非专业提供者来缩小精神卫生治疗差距。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Apr 30;21(6):44. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1028-x.
9
Projected Workforce of Psychiatrists in the United States: A Population Analysis.美国精神科医生的预计劳动力:人口分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jun 1;69(6):710-713. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700344. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
Shared medical appointments for patients with a nondiabetic physical chronic illness: A systematic review.非糖尿病性慢性躯体疾病患者的共享医疗预约:一项系统综述。
Chronic Illn. 2019 Mar;15(1):3-26. doi: 10.1177/1742395317731608. Epub 2017 Sep 19.