• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经右桡动脉途径成功进行冠状动脉造影的临床和影像学预测因素

Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Successful Coronary Angiography Through Right Radial Artery Access.

作者信息

Elfar Sohil, Onsy Ahmed, Farouk Mohamed Amr

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Port Said University Port Said, Egypt.

Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Interv Cardiol. 2023 Jun 13;18:e21. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.04. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.15420/icr.2023.04
PMID:37435602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10331560/
Abstract

: One of the limitations of the right radial access approach is complex vessel anatomy, such as subclavian tortuosity. Several clinical predictors have been proposed for tortuosities, such as older age, female sex and hypertension. In this study, we hypothesised that chest radiography would add predictive value to the traditional predictors. : This prospective blinded study included patients who underwent transradial access coronary angiography. They were classified into four groups according to difficulty: Group I, Group II, Group III and Group IV. Different groups were compared according to clinical and radiographic characteristics. : The study included 108 patients (54, 27, 17 and 10 patients in Groups I, II, III and IV, respectively). The rate of crossover to transfemoral access was 9.26%. Age, hypertension and female sex were associated with a greater difficulty and failure rates. Regarding radiographic parameters, a higher failure rate was associated with a higher diameter of the aortic knuckle (Group IV, 4.09 ± 1.32 cm versus Groups I, II and III combined, 3.26 ± 0.98 cm; p=0.015) and the width of the mediastinum (Group IV, 8.96 ± 2.88 cm versus Groups I, II and III combined, 7.28 ± 1.78 cm; p=0.009). The cut-off value for prominent aortic knuckle was 3.55 cm (sensitivity 70% and specificity 67.35%) and the width of mediastinum was 6.59 cm (sensitivity 90% and specificity 42.86%). : Radiographic prominent aortic knuckle and wide mediastinum are valuable clinical parameters and useful predictors for transradial access failure caused by tortuosity of the right subclavian/brachiocephalic arteries or aorta.

摘要

右桡动脉入路的局限性之一是血管解剖结构复杂,如锁骨下动脉迂曲。已经提出了一些迂曲的临床预测因素,如年龄较大、女性和高血压。在本研究中,我们假设胸部X线摄影将为传统预测因素增加预测价值。

这项前瞻性盲法研究纳入了接受经桡动脉冠状动脉造影的患者。根据难度将他们分为四组:第一组、第二组、第三组和第四组。根据临床和影像学特征对不同组进行比较。

该研究纳入了108例患者(第一组、第二组、第三组和第四组分别有54例、27例、17例和10例患者)。转为经股动脉入路的比例为9.26%。年龄、高血压和女性与更大的难度和失败率相关。关于影像学参数,更高的失败率与更高的主动脉弓直径相关(第四组,4.09±1.32 cm,而第一组、第二组和第三组合并为3.26±0.98 cm;p=0.015)以及纵隔宽度相关(第四组,8.96±2.88 cm,而第一组、第二组和第三组合并为7.28±1.78 cm;p=0.009)。主动脉弓突出的截断值为3.55 cm(敏感性70%,特异性67.35%),纵隔宽度为6.59 cm(敏感性90%,特异性42.86%)。

影像学上主动脉弓突出和纵隔增宽是有价值的临床参数,也是右锁骨下动脉/头臂干动脉或主动脉迂曲导致经桡动脉入路失败的有用预测因素。

相似文献

1
Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Successful Coronary Angiography Through Right Radial Artery Access.经右桡动脉途径成功进行冠状动脉造影的临床和影像学预测因素
Interv Cardiol. 2023 Jun 13;18:e21. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.04. eCollection 2023.
2
Features and variations of a radial artery approach in southern Chinese populations and their clinical significance in percutaneous coronary intervention.中国南方人群桡动脉入路的特点和变异及其在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的临床意义。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Mar;126(6):1046-52.
3
Usefulness of prominently projected aortic arch on chest radiograph to predict severe tortuosity of the right subclavian or brachiocephalic artery in patients aged >44 years undergoing coronary angiography with a right radial artery approach.胸部 X 线片上主动脉弓明显突出对预测>44 岁行右桡动脉入路冠状动脉造影患者右锁骨下动脉或头臂动脉严重迂曲的作用。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jul 15;110(2):203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
4
A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的随机对比:RADIAL-CABG 试验(经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的比较)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
5
CT-reconstructed three-dimensional printed models of the right subclavian artery and aorta define age-related changes and facilitate benchtop catheter testing.右锁骨下动脉和主动脉的CT重建三维打印模型可明确与年龄相关的变化,并有助于进行体外导管测试。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Oct;26(10):E141-4.
6
Transradial Crossover Balloon Occlusion Technique for Primary Access Hemostasis During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Initial Experience With the Oceanus 140 cm and 200 cm Balloon Catheters.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中经桡动脉交叉球囊阻断技术用于主入路止血:Oceanus 140cm 和 200cm 球囊导管的初步经验。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Aug;32(8):283-288. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00037.
7
Prevalence and clinical predictors of severe tortuosity of right subclavian artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影患者右锁骨下动脉严重迂曲的患病率及临床预测因素
Am J Cardiol. 2003 Nov 15;92(10):1220-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.07.038.
8
Comparison of Standard Catheters Versus Radial Artery-Specific Catheter in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Angiography Through Transradial Access.经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉造影患者中标准导管与桡动脉专用导管的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;118(3):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 17.
9
[Choice of an alternative access in failed endovascular intervention through the right radial artery].[经右桡动脉进行血管内介入治疗失败后替代入路的选择]
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2020;26(2):76-83. doi: 10.33529/ANGIO2020203.
10
The concept of an anatomy related individual arterial access: lowering technical and clinical complications with transradial access in bovine- and type-III aortic arch carotid artery stenting.与解剖结构相关的个体化动脉入路概念:在牛型和III型主动脉弓颈动脉支架置入术中经桡动脉入路降低技术和临床并发症
Vasa. 2011 Nov;40(6):468-73. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000150.

引用本文的文献

1
Preliminary Study Using Wearable Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Continuous Monitoring of Hemodynamics Through the Carotid Artery.使用可穿戴近红外光谱法通过颈动脉连续监测血流动力学的初步研究。
Biosensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;15(8):549. doi: 10.3390/bios15080549.
2
Application and Validation of a transRADial Access Score (RAD-Access) in Patient Selection for Safe Radial Access in Liver Cancer Intra-Arterial Procedures.经桡动脉入路评分(RAD-Access)在肝癌动脉内介入治疗安全桡动脉入路患者选择中的应用与验证
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;17(9):1385. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091385.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of the CHADS-VASc Score in Assessing Transradial Approach Failure.应用 CHADS-VASc 评分评估经桡动脉入路失败。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Mar;36:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
Right transradial coronary angiography in the setting of tortuous brachiocephalic/thoracic aorta ("elephant head"): Impact on fluoroscopy time and contrast use.迂曲的头臂干/胸主动脉(“象头”)中右侧经桡动脉冠状动脉造影:对透视时间和造影剂使用的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(2):418-423. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29470. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
3
An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
急性冠状动脉综合征经桡动脉入路和经桡动脉冠状动脉造影及介入治疗的最新进展:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e000035. doi: 10.1161/HCV.0000000000000035.
4
Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影和介入治疗技术失败的预测因素
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1508-1513. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Risk factors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in Chaoshan Chinese: a locally retrospective analysis.潮汕地区汉族人群经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉介入治疗失败的危险因素:一项局部回顾性分析
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jul 15;8(7):11770-6. eCollection 2015.
6
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2015年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
7
Predictors of Conversion from Radial Into Femoral Access in Cardiac Catheterization.心脏导管插入术中桡动脉入路转为股动脉入路的预测因素
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015 May;104(5):401-8. doi: 10.5935/abc.20150017. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
8
Complete transitioning to the radial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a real-world single-center registry of 1808 consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.完全过渡到桡动脉途径进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项针对1808例连续急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的单中心真实世界注册研究。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Sep;26(9):475-82.
9
Strategies to overcome hostile subclavian anatomy during transradial coronary angiography and interventions: impact on fluoroscopy, procedural time, complications, and radial patency.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影及介入治疗中克服锁骨下动脉解剖结构不利因素的策略:对透视、手术时间、并发症及桡动脉通畅率的影响
J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Aug;27(4):428-34. doi: 10.1111/joic.12127. Epub 2014 May 11.
10
Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉入路的采用和与股动脉入路的结果比较:国家心血管数据登记处(2007-2012 年)的最新报告。
Circulation. 2013 Jun 11;127(23):2295-306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000536.