• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经桡动脉冠状动脉造影和介入治疗技术失败的预测因素

Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention.

作者信息

Tröbs Monique, Achenbach Stephan, Plank Pia Maria, Marwan Mohamed, Röther Jens, Klinghammer Lutz, Blachutzik Florian, Schlundt Christian

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1508-1513. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049
PMID:28844520
Abstract

Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased.

摘要

冠状动脉造影和介入治疗采用经桡动脉途径优于股动脉途径,但在技术上可能具有挑战性。识别经桡动脉途径失败的预测因素很重要,尤其是在急性冠状动脉综合征的情况下。因此,我们回顾性分析了13095例连续患者(年龄66±12岁,男性占64%),这些患者尝试经桡动脉途径进行冠状动脉造影或介入治疗,以确定经桡动脉途径失败的预测因素。系统回顾血管造影和患者病历,以分析与失败相关的患者特征。经桡动脉途径失败率为6.8%(13095例中的909例)。经桡动脉途径失败的患者女性比例更高(9.5%对5.5%;p<0.001),年龄显著更大(68±12岁对66±12岁,p<0.001),且体表面积更小(1.89±0.21对1.94±0.2 m;p<0.001)。与其他患者相比,ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经桡动脉途径失败的发生率并无显著更高(8.1%对6.9%,p=0.195)。多变量调整后,只有女性(比值比[OR]1.44,p<0.001)、患者年龄较大(OR 1.01/岁,p=0.002)和身高较低(OR 0.98/cm,p=0.004)独立预测经桡动脉途径失败。总之,女性、年龄较大和身高较低独立预测冠状动脉造影和介入治疗中经桡动脉途径失败。ST段抬高型心肌梗死的失败率并未显著增加。

相似文献

1
Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影和介入治疗技术失败的预测因素
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1508-1513. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
2
Arterial access site and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without vorapaxar.接受或未接受vorapaxar的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的动脉穿刺部位及治疗结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug;88(2):163-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26335. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
3
Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX).经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行冠状动脉介入手术时术者辐射暴露的随机比较:经桡动脉入路减少不良出血事件及血管造影X线辐射剂量系统实施研究(RAD-MATRIX)的原理与设计
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014 Jun;15(4):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
4
Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:对当前证据体系的再评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.003.
5
Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention).女性急性冠状动脉综合征患者行冠状动脉造影/介入治疗时的桡动脉与股动脉入路:来自 RIVAL 试验(冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉与股动脉入路比较)的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):505-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.11.017.
6
Comparison of transradial and transfemoral access in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesions.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂冠状动脉病变患者中的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 1;89(4):640-646. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26669. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
7
Transradial versus transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese.经桡动脉与经股动脉入路行冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在极度肥胖患者中的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug;5(8):819-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.04.009.
8
Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉入路失败的风险评分、原因和临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
9
Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉与股动脉入路的随机多中心试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
10
A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的随机对比:RADIAL-CABG 试验(经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的比较)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Successful Coronary Angiography Through Right Radial Artery Access.经右桡动脉途径成功进行冠状动脉造影的临床和影像学预测因素
Interv Cardiol. 2023 Jun 13;18:e21. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.04. eCollection 2023.
2
Standardized Forearm Angiography Increases Procedural Success Rates of Coronary Angiography and PCI: A Retrospective Analysis of an all-Comers Patient Cohort in a Real-Life Scenario.标准化前臂血管造影术可提高冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的手术成功率:一项真实场景下所有患者队列的回顾性分析。
Cardiol Cardiovasc Med. 2022;6(2):124-136. doi: 10.26502/fccm.92920250. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
Prevalence and predictors of difficult vascular anatomy in forearm artery access for coronary angiography and PCI.
前臂动脉入路行冠状动脉造影和 PCI 时困难血管解剖的发生率及预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 29;12(1):13060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17435-1.
4
Prediction of radial crossover in acute coronary syndromes: derivation and validation of the MATRIX score.急性冠状动脉综合征中桡动脉交叉现象的预测:MATRIX 评分的推导和验证。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Dec 17;17(12):e971-e980. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00441.
5
Intracranial mechanical thrombectomy using a proximal balloon guide catheter via a transradial access.经桡动脉途径使用近端球囊导引导管进行颅内机械取栓术。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Oct;25(5):508-510. doi: 10.1177/1591019919844850. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
6
Layer-specific strain analysis in patients with suspected stable angina pectoris and apparently normal left ventricular wall motion.疑似稳定型心绞痛且左心室壁运动明显正常患者的层特异性应变分析
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2018 Sep 26;16(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12947-018-0144-9.
7
Effect of transient ulnar artery compression on radial artery diameter.短暂尺动脉压迫对桡动脉直径的影响。
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Oct;16(4):3735-3739. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6632. Epub 2018 Aug 20.