J Adhes Dent. 2023 Jul 12;25:147-158. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b4208859.
This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the 14-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free 1-step self-etch adhesive (1SEa) compared with that of a 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (3E&Ra).
267 non-carious cervical lesions in 52 patients were restored with the microhybrid composite Gradia Direct (GC), bonded in random order either with the HEMA-free 1SEa G-Bond (GB; GC) or the 3E&Ra Optibond FL (OFL; Kerr), which is considered the gold-standard E&Ra (control). The restorations were followed over 14 years for retention, marginal adaptation and discoloration, and caries occurrence. Statistical analysis involved a logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations (2-way GEE model).
The patient recall rate at 14 years was 63%. In total, 79 restorations (39 GB, 40 OFL) failed because of retention loss (GB: 19.4%, OFL: 19.6%), severe marginal defects, discoloration and/or caries (GB: 21.7%; OFL: 22.5%). The overall clinical success rate was 58.9% and 57.9% for GB and OFL, respectively. The number of restorations with an unacceptable marginal defect (GB: 14.5%; OFL: 19.2%) and deep marginal discoloration (GB: 18.2%; OFL: 13.2%) increased during the last 5 years. No significant difference in overall clinical performance was recorded between the two adhesives (p > 0.05). Changes in the medical health of some patients and recurrence of abrasion/erosion/abfraction increased the failure rate and retention rate.
After 14 years, restorations bonded with the HEMA-free 1SEa performed as well as those bonded with the 3E&Ra gold standard. Unacceptable marginal deterioration was the main reason for failure, followed by loss of retention.
本随机对照试验旨在评估 14 年临床应用中一种无 HEMA 一步自酸蚀粘结剂(1SEa)与三步酸蚀-冲洗粘结剂(3E&Ra)的临床性能。
52 名患者共 267 个非龋性颈面缺损,用混合微填料型复合材料 Gradia Direct(GC)进行修复,以随机顺序分别用无 HEMA 一步自酸蚀粘结剂 G-Bond(GB;GC)或三步酸蚀-冲洗粘结剂 Optibond FL(OFL; Kerr)进行粘结,后者被认为是酸蚀-冲洗粘结的金标准(对照组)。14 年的随访观察包括保留率、边缘适合性和变色情况以及龋病发生情况。统计分析采用具有广义估计方程(2 向 GEE 模型)的逻辑回归模型。
14 年时的患者召回率为 63%。共有 79 个修复体(39 个 GB,40 个 OFL)因保留率降低(GB:19.4%,OFL:19.6%)、严重边缘缺陷、变色和/或龋病(GB:21.7%;OFL:22.5%)而失败。GB 和 OFL 的总体临床成功率分别为 58.9%和 57.9%。5 年内,具有不可接受的边缘缺陷(GB:14.5%;OFL:19.2%)和深边缘变色(GB:18.2%;OFL:13.2%)的修复体数量增加。两种粘结剂的总体临床性能无显著差异(p>0.05)。一些患者的医疗健康状况改变和磨损/侵蚀/折裂的复发增加了失败率和保留率。
14 年后,用无 HEMA 一步自酸蚀粘结剂粘结的修复体与 3E&Ra 金标准粘结的修复体性能相当。不可接受的边缘恶化是失败的主要原因,其次是保留率降低。