Suppr超能文献

不含甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯的一步法自酸蚀粘结剂用于非龋性颈部病变的五年临床性能

Five-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions.

作者信息

Van Landuyt Kirsten L, De Munck Jan, Ermis R Banu, Peumans Marleen, Van Meerbeek Bart

机构信息

KU Leuven BIOMAT, Department of Oral Health Sciences and University Hospitals Leuven, University of Leuven, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2014 May;18(4):1045-1052. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1061-9. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the clinical performance of a 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)-free one-step adhesive.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred sixty-seven cervical lesions in 52 patients were restored with the composite Gradia Direct (GC), bonded with either the one-step self-etch adhesive G-Bond (GC) or the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Optibond FL (Kerr) in a random order. The restorations were evaluated for retention, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, and caries occurrence after 5 years. Specific statistics were used to account for the clustered data (multiple restorations per patient).

RESULTS

The clinical success rate for G-Bond (87.4 %) was not significantly different from that of Optibond FL (90.9 %). Both adhesives showed progressive marginal deterioration, but G-Bond exhibited more small enamel defects and marginal discoloration, and unlike previous recalls, several restorations failed because of deep microleakage. Large sclerotic lesions were a significant risk factor for retention loss with G-Bond. Irrespective of the adhesive, almost all restorations with retention loss were located in the lower jaw.

CONCLUSION

After 5 years of clinical service, restorations bonded with the HEMA-free one-step adhesive did not need repair or replacement more often than those with the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, and both adhesives had a high retention rate (>90 %). There were indications that G-Bond did not (self-)etch enough in some clinical situations, as G-Bond exhibited more incisal defects and marginal discolorations, and sclerotic lesions were at higher risk of retention loss.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The clinical performance of the HEMA-free one-step adhesive was clinically acceptable after 5 years.

摘要

目的

本随机对照试验的目的是评估一种不含甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯(HEMA)的一步法粘结剂的临床性能。

材料与方法

52例患者的267处颈部病变用复合树脂Gradia Direct(GC)修复,随机顺序分别用一步法自酸蚀粘结剂G-Bond(GC)或三步法酸蚀冲洗粘结剂Optibond FL( Kerr)进行粘结。5年后对修复体的固位、边缘完整性、边缘变色和龋病发生情况进行评估。采用特定统计方法处理聚类数据(每位患者有多个修复体)。

结果

G-Bond的临床成功率(87.4%)与Optibond FL的临床成功率(90.9%)无显著差异。两种粘结剂均显示边缘逐渐恶化,但G-Bond出现更多小的釉质缺损和边缘变色,且与之前的报道不同,一些修复体因深层微渗漏而失败。大的硬化性病变是G-Bond固位丧失的显著危险因素。无论使用哪种粘结剂,几乎所有固位丧失的修复体都位于下颌。

结论

临床使用5年后,与三步法酸蚀冲洗粘结剂相比,使用不含HEMA的一步法粘结剂粘结的修复体并不更常需要修复或更换,且两种粘结剂的固位率均较高(>90%)。有迹象表明,在某些临床情况下,G-Bond的(自)酸蚀不足,因为G-Bond出现更多切端缺损和边缘变色,且硬化性病变固位丧失的风险更高。

临床意义

不含HEMA的一步法粘结剂在临床使用5年后的临床性能是可以接受的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验