Section of Neuroradiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 2 Sheba Rd, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Neuroradiology. 2023 Oct;65(10):1517-1525. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03193-y. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
Abnormal fetal brain measurements might affect clinical management and parental counseling. The effect of between-field-strength differences was not evaluated in quantitative fetal brain imaging until now. Our study aimed to compare fetal brain biometry measurements in 3.0 T with 1.5 T scanners.
A retrospective cohort of 1150 low-risk fetuses scanned between 2012 and 2021, with apparently normal brain anatomy, were retrospectively evaluated for biometric measurements. The cohort included 1.5 T (442 fetuses) and 3.0 T scans (708 fetuses) of populations with comparable characteristics in the same tertiary medical center. Manually measured biometry included bi-parietal, fronto-occipital and trans-cerebellar diameters, length of the corpus-callosum, vermis height, and width. Measurements were then converted to centiles based on previously reported biometric reference charts. The 1.5 T centiles were compared with the 3.0 T centiles.
No significant differences between centiles of bi-parietal diameter, trans-cerebellar diameter, or length of the corpus callosum between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners were found. Small absolute differences were found in the vermis height, with higher centiles in the 3.0 T, compared to the 1.5 T scanner (54.6th-centile, vs. 39.0th-centile, p < 0.001); less significant differences were found in vermis width centiles (46.9th-centile vs. 37.5th-centile, p = 0.03). Fronto-occipital diameter was higher in 1.5 T than in the 3.0 T scanner (66.0th-centile vs. 61.8th-centile, p = 0.02).
The increasing use of 3.0 T MRI for fetal imaging poses a potential bias when using 1.5 T-based charts. We elucidate those biometric measurements are comparable, with relatively small between-field-strength differences, when using manual biometric measurements. Small inter-magnet differences can be related to higher spatial resolution with 3 T scanners and may be substantial when evaluating small brain structures, such as the vermis.
异常的胎儿脑部测量值可能会影响临床管理和家长咨询。直到现在,在定量胎儿脑成像中,还没有评估场强差异的影响。我们的研究旨在比较 3.0T 和 1.5T 扫描仪的胎儿脑生物测量值。
回顾性分析了 2012 年至 2021 年间在同一三级医疗中心接受扫描的 1150 例低危胎儿的脑解剖结构正常的病例,对其进行了生物测量值的回顾性评估。该队列包括在同一中心进行的 1.5T(442 例)和 3.0T(708 例)扫描,其人群特征具有可比性。手动测量的生物计量学指标包括双顶骨、额枕骨和横小脑直径、胼胝体长度、蚓部高度和宽度。然后根据先前报道的生物测量参考图表将测量值转换为百分位数。将 1.5T 百分位数与 3.0T 百分位数进行比较。
在 1.5T 和 3.0T 扫描仪之间,双顶骨直径、横小脑直径或胼胝体长度的百分位数没有显著差异。在蚓部高度上发现了较小的绝对差异,3.0T 扫描仪的百分位数较高(第 54.6 百分位数,vs. 第 39.0 百分位数,p<0.001);蚓部宽度百分位数的差异较小(第 46.9 百分位数,vs. 第 37.5 百分位数,p=0.03)。额枕骨直径在 1.5T 中高于 3.0T 扫描仪(第 66.0 百分位数,vs. 第 61.8 百分位数,p=0.02)。
3.0T MRI 越来越多地用于胎儿成像,这可能会在使用基于 1.5T 的图表时造成潜在的偏差。我们阐明了使用手动生物计量测量值时,这些生物计量值是可比的,场强差异相对较小。当评估较小的脑结构,如蚓部时,不同磁体之间的微小差异可能与 3T 扫描仪的更高空间分辨率有关,并且可能非常重要。