• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加权累积暴露模型估计受到反向因果关系偏倚的影响,但可以在敏感性分析中进行研究。

Reverse causation biases weighted cumulative exposure model estimates, but can be investigated in sensitivity analyses.

机构信息

Biostatistics and Biomathematics Unit, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.

Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Sep;161:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.001
PMID:37437786
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of reverse causation on estimates from the weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) model that is used in pharmacoepidemiology to explore drug-health outcome associations, and to identify sensitivity analyses for revealing such effects.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

314,099 patients with diabetes under Clalit Health Services, Israel, were followed over 2002-2012. The association between metformin and pancreatic cancer (PC) was explored using a WCE model within the framework of discrete-time Cox regression. We used computer simulations to explore the effects of reverse causation on estimates of a WCE model and to examine sensitivity analyses for revealing and adjusting for reverse causation. We then applied those sensitivity analyses to our data.

RESULTS

Simulation demonstrated bias in the weighted cumulative exposure model and showed that sensitivity analysis could reveal and adjust for these biases. In our data, a positive association was observed (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.24-4.73) with metformin exposure in the previous 2 years. After applying sensitivity analysis, assuming reverse causation operated up to 4 years before cancer diagnosis, the association between metformin and PC was no longer apparent.

CONCLUSION

Reverse causation can cause substantial bias in the WCE model. When suspected, sensitivity analyses based on causal analysis are advocated.

摘要

目的

探讨在药物流行病学中用于探索药物-健康结果相关性的加权累计暴露(WCE)模型中,反向因果关系对估计值的影响,并确定用于揭示此类影响的敏感性分析。

研究设计和设置

对以色列克拉利特健康服务机构的 314099 名糖尿病患者进行了 2002-2012 年的随访。在离散时间 Cox 回归框架内,使用 WCE 模型探讨二甲双胍与胰腺癌(PC)之间的关联。我们使用计算机模拟来探讨反向因果关系对 WCE 模型估计值的影响,并检查用于揭示和调整反向因果关系的敏感性分析。然后,我们将这些敏感性分析应用于我们的数据。

结果

模拟结果表明,加权累计暴露模型存在偏差,并表明敏感性分析可以揭示和调整这些偏差。在我们的数据中,观察到二甲双胍在前 2 年的暴露与胰腺癌之间存在正相关(风险比(HR)= 3.24,95%置信区间(CI):2.24-4.73)。在应用敏感性分析后,假设反向因果关系在癌症诊断前 4 年内起作用,二甲双胍与 PC 之间的关联不再明显。

结论

反向因果关系会导致 WCE 模型产生重大偏差。当怀疑存在反向因果关系时,提倡基于因果分析的敏感性分析。

相似文献

1
Reverse causation biases weighted cumulative exposure model estimates, but can be investigated in sensitivity analyses.加权累积暴露模型估计受到反向因果关系偏倚的影响,但可以在敏感性分析中进行研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Sep;161:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Metformin Treatment and Cancer Risk: Cox Regression Analysis, With Time-Dependent Covariates, of 320,000 Persons With Incident Diabetes Mellitus.二甲双胍治疗与癌症风险:32 万名新发糖尿病患者的 Cox 回归分析,包含时间依赖性协变量。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 1;188(10):1794-1800. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz157.
3
Reverse causation bias: A simulation study comparing first- and second-line treatments with an overlap of symptoms between treatment indication and studied outcome.反向因果偏倚:一项比较一线和二线治疗方法的模拟研究,这些治疗方法在治疗指征和研究结果之间存在症状重叠。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 12;19(7):e0304145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304145. eCollection 2024.
4
Physical activity and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: assessing the impact of reverse causation and measurement error in two large prospective cohorts.身体活动与全因死亡率和死因特异性死亡率:在两个大型前瞻性队列中评估反向因果关系和测量误差的影响。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;36(3):275-285. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00707-3. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Metformin and cancer in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and comprehensive bias evaluation.二甲双胍与2型糖尿病中的癌症:一项系统评价与全面偏倚评估
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):728-744. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw275.
7
Impact of Drug Exposure Definitions on Observed Associations in Pharmacoepidemiology Research.药物暴露定义对药物流行病学研究中观察到的关联的影响。
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar 20;25(1):e39-e52. doi: 10.22374/1710-6222.25.1.4.
8
The weighted cumulative exposure method and its application to pharmacoepidemiology: A narrative review.加权累积暴露法及其在药物流行病学中的应用:叙述性综述。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;33(1):e5701. doi: 10.1002/pds.5701. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
9
Time-Varying Risk for Breast Cancer Following Initiation of Glucose-Lowering Therapy in Women with Type 2 Diabetes: Exploring Detection Bias.女性 2 型糖尿病患者起始降糖治疗后乳腺癌风险的时变:探讨检测偏倚。
Can J Diabetes. 2017 Apr;41(2):204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.08.227. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
10
Metformin Treatment Among Men With Diabetes and the Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Historical Cohort Study.二甲双胍治疗糖尿病男性与前列腺癌风险:基于人群的历史队列研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 24;191(4):626-635. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab287.

引用本文的文献

1
Mendelian randomization reveals the causal association between gout and hearing impairment in older adults.孟德尔随机化揭示了老年人群中痛风与听力损伤之间的因果关联。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 31;103(22):e38259. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038259.
2
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Pancreatic Cancer Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂与 2 型糖尿病患者的胰腺癌风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2350408. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50408.