Suppr超能文献

身体活动与全因死亡率和死因特异性死亡率:在两个大型前瞻性队列中评估反向因果关系和测量误差的影响。

Physical activity and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: assessing the impact of reverse causation and measurement error in two large prospective cohorts.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;36(3):275-285. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00707-3. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Abstract

Most cohort studies have only a single physical activity (PA) measure and are thus susceptible to reverse causation and measurement error. Few studies have examined the impact of these potential biases on the association between PA and mortality. A total of 133,819 participants from Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2014) reported PA through biennial questionnaires. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PA and mortality using different analytic approaches comparing single (baseline, simple update = most recent) versus repeated (cumulative average) measures of PA and applying various lag times separating PA measurement and time at risk. Over 3.2 million person-years, we documented 47,273 deaths. The pooled multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI) of all-cause mortality per 10 MET-hour/week was 0.95 (0.94-0.96) for baseline PA, 0.78 (0.77-0.79) for simple updated PA and 0.87 (0.86-0.88) for cumulative average PA in the range of 0-50 MET-hour/week. Simple updated PA showed the strongest inverse association, suggesting larger impact of reverse causation. Application of 2-year lag substantially reduced the apparent reverse causation (0.85 (0.84-0.86) for simple updated PA and 0.90 (0.89-0.91) for cumulative average PA), and 4-12-year lags had minimal additional effects. In the dose-response analysis, baseline or simple updated PA showed a J or U-shaped association with all-cause mortality while cumulative average PA showed an inverse association across a wide range of PA (0-150 MET-hour/week). Similar findings were observed for different specific mortality causes. In conclusion, PA measured at baseline or with short lag time was prone to bias. Cumulative average PA showed robust evidence that PA is inversely associated with mortality in a dose-response manner.

摘要

大多数队列研究只有一项单一的体力活动(PA)测量,因此容易受到反向因果关系和测量误差的影响。很少有研究探讨这些潜在偏差对 PA 与死亡率之间关联的影响。共有 133819 名来自护士健康研究和健康专业人员随访研究(1986-2014 年)的参与者通过两年一次的问卷报告 PA。使用 Cox 回归估计 PA 与死亡率之间的危险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI),使用不同的分析方法比较 PA 的单一(基线,简单更新=最近一次)与重复(累积平均)测量,并应用各种将 PA 测量与风险时间分开的滞后时间。在超过 320 万人年的时间里,我们记录了 47273 例死亡。基线 PA 每 10 MET 小时/周的全因死亡率的合并多变量调整 HR(95%CI)为 0.95(0.94-0.96),简单更新 PA 为 0.78(0.77-0.79),累积平均 PA 为 0.87(0.86-0.88),范围为 0-50 MET 小时/周。简单更新的 PA 显示出最强的反比关联,表明反向因果关系的影响更大。应用 2 年滞后时间大大降低了明显的反向因果关系(简单更新 PA 为 0.85(0.84-0.86),累积平均 PA 为 0.90(0.89-0.91)),4-12 年滞后时间的影响最小。在剂量反应分析中,基线或简单更新的 PA 与全因死亡率呈 J 或 U 形关联,而累积平均 PA 在广泛的 PA 范围内呈反比关联(0-150 MET 小时/周)。不同特定死亡原因也观察到类似的发现。总之,基线或短滞后时间测量的 PA 容易产生偏差。累积平均 PA 提供了有力的证据,表明 PA 与死亡率呈剂量反应反比关系。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
A Systematic Review of Associations of Physical Activity and Sedentary Time with Asthma Outcomes.体力活动和久坐时间与哮喘结局相关性的系统评价。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Nov-Dec;6(6):1968-1981.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.02.027. Epub 2018 Mar 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验