• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

入学头 6 个月的早期读写模式和单词阅读技能发展与阅读教学。

Patterns of early literacy and word reading skill development across the first 6 months of school and reading instruction.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Otago.

出版信息

Sch Psychol. 2024 Jan;39(1):81-94. doi: 10.1037/spq0000563. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1037/spq0000563
PMID:37439746
Abstract

This study described the growth trajectories of 105 children ( = 55 boys) who had just started primary school in New Zealand (NZ). Children were assessed every fourth school week around 1.5 months after starting school, for five sessions on Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills first sound fluency (FSF), AIMSweb letter sound fluency (LSF), and a newly created NZ word identification fluency (NZWIF-Y1), designed for alignment with beginning reading instruction in NZ. In addition to progress monitoring tasks, children were assessed at school entry and after progress monitoring on literacy-related criterion measures. All three progress monitoring measures were sensitive to growth over the children's first 6 months of school. Cross-sectional time-series analyses indicated that within-child increases in FSF and LSF were associated with increases in NZWIF-Y1, although FSF did not add unique variance when both FSF and LSF were entered as predictors. Furthermore, growth mixture modeling indicated three latent growth trajectories for each indicator (FSF, LSF, NZWIF-Y1, respectively): Class 1-high initial scores and strong growth over time (72.09%, 55.87%, 22.81%); Class 2-lower initial scores and moderate growth over time (19.18%, 29.12%, 54.30%); and Class 3-low initial scores and limited progress over time (8.73%, 15.00%, 22.89%). Criterion measures assessed prior and after progress monitoring were typically associated with latent class membership. Results suggest relative growth in performance on repeated assessment of early literacy and word reading skills in beginning reading instruction distinguishes groups of students with differential skill acquisition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究描述了在新西兰(NZ)刚上小学的 105 名儿童(= 55 名男孩)的成长轨迹。在入学后约 1.5 个月,每隔四周学校周对儿童进行评估,共进行五次动态基本早期读写技能指标(Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills)首字母流畅度(FSF)、AIMSweb 字母发音流畅度(LSF)和新创建的新西兰单词识别流畅度(NZWIF-Y1)评估,旨在与新西兰的开始阅读教学保持一致。除了进展监测任务外,还在入学时和进展监测后对儿童进行了与读写能力相关的标准测量评估。所有三种进展监测措施都能敏感地反映出儿童在上学的头 6 个月的成长情况。横断时间序列分析表明,FSF 和 LSF 内的个体增长与 NZWIF-Y1 的增长相关,尽管当 FSF 和 LSF 都作为预测因子输入时,FSF 并未增加独特的方差。此外,增长混合模型表明,每个指标(FSF、LSF、NZWIF-Y1)都有三个潜在的增长轨迹:第 1 类-初始分数较高且随时间增长强劲(72.09%、55.87%、22.81%);第 2 类-初始分数较低且随时间适度增长(19.18%、29.12%、54.30%);第 3 类-初始分数较低且随时间进展有限(8.73%、15.00%、22.89%)。进展监测前后评估的标准测量通常与潜在类别成员资格相关。结果表明,在开始阅读教学中,对早期读写和单词阅读技能的重复评估中的相对增长可以区分具有不同技能习得的学生群体。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Patterns of early literacy and word reading skill development across the first 6 months of school and reading instruction.入学头 6 个月的早期读写模式和单词阅读技能发展与阅读教学。
Sch Psychol. 2024 Jan;39(1):81-94. doi: 10.1037/spq0000563. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
Describing patterns of early literacy skill development in the first year of school and reading instruction in a New Zealand sample.描述新西兰样本中学校第一年的早期读写技能发展模式和阅读教学情况。
Sch Psychol. 2020 Jul;35(4):243-254. doi: 10.1037/spq0000370.
3
School-entry skills and early skill trajectories predict reading after 1 year.入学技能和早期技能轨迹预测 1 年后的阅读能力。
Sch Psychol. 2023 Jul;38(4):199-214. doi: 10.1037/spq0000544. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
4
Growth on sublexical fluency progress monitoring measures in early kindergarten and relations to word reading acquisition.早期幼儿园次词汇流畅度进展监测指标的增长与单词阅读习得的关系。
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Apr;79:43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
5
Assessing the consequential validity of early literacy progress monitoring data: An investigation of the accuracy of decision rules to evaluate response to instruction.评估早期读写能力进展监测数据的推论有效性:评估对教学反应的决策规则准确性的调查。
Sch Psychol. 2019 Sep;34(5):512-520. doi: 10.1037/spq0000321. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
6
Early maternal language input and classroom instructional quality in relation to children's literacy trajectories from pre-kindergarten through fifth grade.早期的母语言语输入和课堂教学质量与儿童从学前到五年级的读写轨迹有关。
Dev Psychol. 2022 Jun;58(6):1066-1082. doi: 10.1037/dev0001080. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
7
The effect of a multicomponent literacy instruction model on literacy growth for kindergartners and first-grade students in Chile.智利的一项多元文化读写教学模式对幼儿园和一年级学生读写能力发展的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(5):747-61. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.719628. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
8
Genetic and environmental influences on early literacy skills across school grade contexts.遗传和环境因素对各学龄段早期读写能力的影响。
Dev Sci. 2017 Sep;20(5). doi: 10.1111/desc.12434. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
9
Reception class predictors of literacy skills.识字技能的小班预测指标。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Jun;75(Pt 2):171-88. doi: 10.1348/000709904X24780.
10
Efficacy of ABRACADABRA literacy instruction in a school setting for children with autism spectrum disorders.ABRACADABRA 读写教学法在学校环境中对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的疗效。
Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Feb;85:104-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Dec 7.