• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期幼儿园次词汇流畅度进展监测指标的增长与单词阅读习得的关系。

Growth on sublexical fluency progress monitoring measures in early kindergarten and relations to word reading acquisition.

机构信息

Department of Special Education, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.

Department of Educational Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.

出版信息

J Sch Psychol. 2020 Apr;79:43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2020.01.003
PMID:32389248
Abstract

Fluency with skills that operate below the word level (i.e., sublexical), such as phonemic awareness and alphabetic knowledge, may ease the acquisition of decoding skills (Ritchey & Speece, 2006). Measures of sublexical fluency such as phoneme segmentation fluency (PSF), letter naming fluency (LNF), and letter sound fluency (LSF) are widely available for monitoring kindergarten reading progress, but less is known about the relative importance of growth in each skill across the early months of formal reading instruction and their relation to subsequent decoding acquisition. With a sample of kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties, this study investigated the extent to which initial status and growth in PSF, LNF, and LSF, administered on a progress-monitoring basis during the fall of kindergarten, were differentially predictive of word reading fluency skills at mid-year and growth across the second half the school year. We used two different fluency-based progress monitoring measures of word reading across the spring, one consisting entirely of phonetically regular consonant-vowel-consonant words, and the other that included phonetically regular and irregular words that varied in length. Results indicated that although initial status and fall growth in all sublexical fluency measures were positively associated with subsequent word reading, LSF across the fall of kindergarten was the strongest overall predictor of mid-year level and growth on both word reading measures, and unique in its prediction over the effects of LNF and PSF. Results underscore the importance of letter-sound knowledge for word reading development, and provide additional evidence for LSF as a key index of progress for at-risk learners across the early months of formal reading instruction.

摘要

在低于单词水平的技能(例如音素意识和字母知识)方面的流利程度,可能会减轻解码技能的习得难度(Ritchey & Speece, 2006)。亚词汇流畅性的衡量标准,如音素分割流畅性(PSF)、字母命名流畅性(LNF)和字母发音流畅性(LSF),广泛用于监测幼儿园阅读进展,但对于在正式阅读教学的早期几个月中,每种技能的增长相对重要性以及它们与后续解码习得的关系,了解较少。本研究以有阅读困难风险的幼儿园学生为样本,调查了在幼儿园秋季以进度监测为基础进行的 PSF、LNF 和 LSF 的初始状态和增长程度,在多大程度上可以预测中期的单词阅读流畅性技能以及整个下半年的增长。我们在春季使用了两种不同的基于流畅性的单词阅读进度监测方法,一种完全由符合读音规则的辅音-元音-辅音单词组成,另一种则包括读音规则和不规则的单词,长度不一。结果表明,尽管所有亚词汇流畅性衡量标准的初始状态和秋季的增长都与随后的单词阅读能力呈正相关,但幼儿园秋季的 LSF 是预测中期水平和两种单词阅读测量增长的最强指标,而且在预测 LNF 和 PSF 效果方面具有独特性。研究结果强调了字母发音知识对于单词阅读发展的重要性,并为 LSF 作为正式阅读教学早期阶段有风险学习者的进展关键指标提供了额外证据。

相似文献

1
Growth on sublexical fluency progress monitoring measures in early kindergarten and relations to word reading acquisition.早期幼儿园次词汇流畅度进展监测指标的增长与单词阅读习得的关系。
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Apr;79:43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
2
Advancing Stage 2 Research on Measures for Monitoring Kindergarten Reading Progress.推进幼儿园阅读进展监测措施的第二阶段研究。
J Learn Disabil. 2018 Jan/Feb;51(1):85-104. doi: 10.1177/0022219416688171. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
3
Kindergarten literacy assessment of English Only and English language learner students: An examination of the predictive validity of three phonemic awareness measures.仅以英语和英语语言学习者的幼儿园识字评估:对三种语音意识测量的预测效度的检验。
J Sch Psychol. 2009 Dec;47(6):369-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Sep 13.
4
Patterns of early literacy and word reading skill development across the first 6 months of school and reading instruction.入学头 6 个月的早期读写模式和单词阅读技能发展与阅读教学。
Sch Psychol. 2024 Jan;39(1):81-94. doi: 10.1037/spq0000563. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
Reading First kindergarten classroom instruction and students' growth in phonological awareness and letter naming-decoding fluency.“阅读优先”幼儿园课堂教学与学生语音意识及字母命名解码流畅性的发展
J Sch Psychol. 2008 Jun;46(3):281-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
6
Preliteracy Skills Mediate the Relation Between Early Speech Sound Production and Subsequent Reading Outcomes.前读写技能中介了早期语音产生与后续阅读结果之间的关系。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Aug 3;66(8):2766-2782. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00142. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
7
The effect of a multicomponent literacy instruction model on literacy growth for kindergartners and first-grade students in Chile.智利的一项多元文化读写教学模式对幼儿园和一年级学生读写能力发展的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(5):747-61. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.719628. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
8
Assessing spelling in kindergarten: further comparison of scoring metrics and their relation to reading skills.评估幼儿园阶段的拼写能力:评分指标的进一步比较及其与阅读技能的关系。
J Sch Psychol. 2014 Feb;52(1):49-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
9
Genetic and environmental influences on early literacy skills across school grade contexts.遗传和环境因素对各学龄段早期读写能力的影响。
Dev Sci. 2017 Sep;20(5). doi: 10.1111/desc.12434. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
10
Silent word-reading fluency is strongly associated with orthotactic sensitivity among elementary school children.默读流畅度与小学生的正字法敏感性密切相关。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 May;205:105061. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105061. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive validity of early and mid-year literacy assessments for end-of-year word reading fluency.年初和年中读写能力评估对年末单词阅读流畅性的预测效度。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0327242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327242. eCollection 2025.
2
Development, Reliability, and Validity of the Preschool Learning Skills Scale: A Tool for Early Identification of Preschoolers at Risk of Learning Disorder in Mainland China.《学前学习技能量表的编制、信效度研究:中国大陆地区早期识别有学习障碍风险学龄前儿童的工具》
Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 13;13:918163. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.918163. eCollection 2022.