• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前路骶棘韧带子宫固定术:自体组织与网片增强修复术治疗原发性子宫阴道脱垂的比较

Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management.

作者信息

Overholt Tyler L, Velet Liliya, Xu Mark, Dutta Rahul, Matthews Catherine A

机构信息

Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston Salem, NC, 27157, USA.

Division of Female Pelvic Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, 1 Medical Center Blvd, Winston Salem, NC, 27157, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Oct;34(10):2603-2609. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05589-z. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-023-05589-z
PMID:37439863
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Anterior sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH) was popularized by transvaginal mesh kits. Following mesh-kit market withdrawal, we hypothesized similar efficacy through native-tissue reattachment of the pubocervical fascia with fixation of the anterior cervix to the sacrospinous ligament. Few analyses for anterior native-tissue versus mesh-augmented SSH exist.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of women who underwent transvaginal anterior SSH between 01 January 2016 and 31 December 2022 was performed. Women who underwent a mesh-augmented (Uphold Lite Vaginal Support System™) versus native-tissue repair were compared. Composite success was defined as no bulge symptoms, no retreatment, and no recurrence beyond the hymen with apex nondescended > one third of the total vaginal length. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were obtained as indicated.

RESULTS

Of 223 women screened, inclusion criteria were met by 124 (40 mesh-augmented; 84 native-tissue). There was no difference in pre-operative characteristics between groups. Composite success was demonstrated in 95.2% of women with a median follow-up of 224 days (range: 30-988). Two women in the mesh-augmented group reported bulge symptoms and underwent re-treatment with a pessary. Four women in the native-tissue group reported bulge symptoms; 3 underwent re-treatment (2 pessary, 1 surgery). There were no differences in composite success rates between groups (p=0.954). There were additionally no differences in intra-operative (p=0.752) or post-operative (p=0.292) complication rates between the groups. There were no mesh-related complications, including exposure or chronic pelvic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Ninety-five percent of women achieved surgical success and the use of mesh augmentation did not confer added benefit in terms of efficacy or complications when compared with native tissue. Further long-term data are needed to continue our assessment of native-tissue anterior SSH.

摘要

引言与假设

经阴道网片套件使骶棘肌前固定术(SSH)得到推广。在网片套件退出市场后,我们推测通过耻骨宫颈筋膜的自体组织重新附着并将子宫颈前部固定于骶棘韧带,可获得相似的疗效。目前针对自体组织与网片增强型SSH的比较分析较少。

方法

对2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间接受经阴道前侧SSH手术的女性进行回顾性分析。比较接受网片增强修复(Uphold Lite阴道支撑系统™)与自体组织修复的女性。综合成功定义为无膨出症状、无需再次治疗且处女膜以上无复发,顶端下降未超过阴道总长度的三分之一。按要求获取描述性和双变量统计数据。

结果

在筛查的223名女性中,124名符合纳入标准(40名接受网片增强修复;84名接受自体组织修复)。两组术前特征无差异。中位随访224天(范围:30 - 988天),95.2%的女性获得综合成功。网片增强组有两名女性报告有膨出症状并接受子宫托再次治疗。自体组织组有四名女性报告有膨出症状;3名接受再次治疗(2名使用子宫托,1名接受手术)。两组综合成功率无差异(p = 0.954)。两组术中(p = 0.752)或术后(p = 0.292)并发症发生率也无差异。未出现与网片相关的并发症,包括暴露或慢性盆腔疼痛。

结论

95%的女性手术成功,与自体组织相比,使用网片增强在疗效或并发症方面未带来额外益处。需要进一步的长期数据来继续评估自体组织前侧SSH。

相似文献

1
Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management.前路骶棘韧带子宫固定术:自体组织与网片增强修复术治疗原发性子宫阴道脱垂的比较
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Oct;34(10):2603-2609. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05589-z. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.女性盆腔器官脱垂的外科治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5.
3
Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.骶棘韧带固定术联合移植物与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗女性阴道前壁膨出的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验的 5 年结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):153.e1-153.e31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
4
Short-term outcomes of sacrospinous hysteropexy through an anterior approach.经前路行骶骨固定术治疗子宫悬吊术的短期疗效。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jun;32(6):1555-1563. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04641-6. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
Sacrospinous hysteropexy with a low weight transvaginal polypropylene mesh for treatment of complete uterovaginal eversion.经阴道骶棘韧带固定术联合低重量聚丙烯网片治疗完全子宫阴道脱垂。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jul-Aug;45(4):856-857. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0555.
6
Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.经骶骨固定术或阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术后盆腔器官脱垂复发的危险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):252.e1-252.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.017. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
7
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.骶棘韧带固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗 2 度或以上子宫脱垂的疗效比较:多中心随机试验的随访观察。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
8
Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.阴道网片子宫固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨悬吊带治疗女性阴道前壁脱垂的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 17;322(11):1054-1065. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12812.
9
Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.阴道和腹腔镜网状子宫固定术治疗子宫阴道脱垂:一项平行队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):38.e1-38.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.035. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
10
Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes for Vaginal Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with or without Transvaginal Mesh Insertion.经阴道骶棘韧带固定术加或不加经阴道网片植入术后早期结局的比较。
J Clin Med. 2023 May 25;12(11):3667. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113667.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical outcomes of sacrospinous hysteropexy and hysteropreservation for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.骶棘韧带子宫悬吊术与子宫保留术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的手术效果:随机对照试验的系统评价
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 24;11:1399247. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1399247. eCollection 2024.
2
Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management.前路骶棘韧带子宫固定术:原发性子宫阴道脱垂治疗中使用自体组织与网片增强修复的比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Mar;35(3):735. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05739-x. Epub 2024 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Database Updates and Resulting Changes in Data in Study of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy.阴道网片子宫悬吊术与阴道子宫切除术研究中的数据库更新及数据由此产生的变化
JAMA. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):695-696. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0477.
2
Short-term outcomes of sacrospinous hysteropexy through an anterior approach.经前路行骶骨固定术治疗子宫悬吊术的短期疗效。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jun;32(6):1555-1563. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04641-6. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
3
Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
阴道网片子宫固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨悬吊带治疗女性阴道前壁脱垂的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 17;322(11):1054-1065. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12812.
4
Evidence-Based Review of Vaginal Native Tissue Hysteropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.基于证据的阴道固有组织子宫阴道脱垂固定术综述。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2019 Jul;74(7):429-435. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000686.
5
Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques.原发性子宫脱垂的外科治疗:阴道自体组织手术技术的比较
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Nov;30(11):1887-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03950-9. Epub 2019 May 3.
6
Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.子宫固定术:盆腔器官脱垂修复的一种选择。
Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Feb 23;19(2):15. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0765-4.
7
Safety of Mesh for Vaginal Cystocele Repair: Analysis of National Patient Characteristics and Complications.阴道膀胱膨出修补术用网片的安全性:全国患者特征和并发症分析。
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):632-637. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
8
Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.骶棘韧带子宫固定术:结局的综述与荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Sep;28(9):1285-1294. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3291-x. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
9
Evaluation of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy vs. Uterosacral Suspension for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Assessment.骶棘韧带子宫固定术与子宫骶骨悬吊术治疗子宫脱垂的疗效评估:一项回顾性分析
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2017 Jan;9(1):33-37. doi: 10.1111/luts.12104. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
10
Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.阴道和腹腔镜网状子宫固定术治疗子宫阴道脱垂:一项平行队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):38.e1-38.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.035. Epub 2016 Sep 3.