• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性子宫脱垂的外科治疗:阴道自体组织手术技术的比较

Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques.

作者信息

Husby Karen Ruben, Larsen Michael Due, Lose Gunnar, Klarskov Niels

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.

University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Nov;30(11):1887-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03950-9. Epub 2019 May 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-019-03950-9
PMID:31053904
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Uterine prolapse is a common diagnosis. Today no consensus exists on which operation technique is ideal to treat apical prolapse. Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) with suspension of the vaginal cuff is the most frequently used. The popularity of uterus-preserving techniques is increasing. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of vaginal native tissue operations to treat primary apical prolapse, evaluated on risk of relapse surgery.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Danish National Patient Registry (NPR), which contains all operations performed in Denmark. Patients operated on for primary apical prolapse in Denmark 2010-2016 were included and followed until 2017. Clinical data were obtained from the Danish Urogynecological Database. Patients who were previously hysterectomized or operated on for prolapse in the apical compartment were excluded. Data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis and adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, preoperative prolapse stage and previous POP operations.

RESULTS

In total, 7247 operations were included. The hazard ratio (HR) for relapse operation in the apical compartment was significantly higher after sacrospinous hysteropexy (SH) compared with the Manchester-Fothergill procedure (MP) [40.2 confidence interval (CI) 21.6-74.7] and VH (8.5 CI: 6.0-12.1). Likewise, the HR was higher in the anterior compartment after SH compared with MP (4.3 CI: 2.9-6.4) and VH (2.8 CI: 2.0-4.0). No convincing difference was found in the posterior compartment. The 5-year reoperation rates were 30%, 7% and 11% after SH, MP, and VH, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacrospinous hysteropexy has exceedingly high numbers of reoperations due to prolapse recurrence.

摘要

引言与假设

子宫脱垂是一种常见诊断。目前对于治疗顶端脱垂的理想手术技术尚无共识。阴道子宫切除术(VH)加阴道断端悬吊术是最常用的方法。保留子宫技术的应用正在增加。本研究的目的是比较阴道自体组织手术治疗原发性顶端脱垂的效果,并根据复发手术风险进行评估。

方法

数据来自丹麦国家患者登记处(NPR),其中包含在丹麦进行的所有手术。纳入2010年至2016年在丹麦接受原发性顶端脱垂手术的患者,并随访至2017年。临床数据来自丹麦泌尿妇科数据库。排除既往接受过子宫切除术或顶端区域脱垂手术的患者。使用Cox比例风险回归分析对数据进行分析,并对年龄、体重指数、吸烟情况、术前脱垂分期和既往盆底器官脱垂手术进行校正。

结果

共纳入7247例手术。与曼彻斯特 - 福瑟吉尔手术(MP)[40.2,置信区间(CI)21.6 - 74.7]和VH(8.5,CI:6.0 - 12.1)相比,骶棘韧带子宫固定术(SH)后顶端区域复发手术的风险比(HR)显著更高。同样,与MP(4.3,CI:2.9 - 6.4)和VH(2.8,CI:2.0 - 4.0)相比,SH后前区域的HR也更高。后区域未发现有说服力的差异。SH、MP和VH后的5年再次手术率分别为30%、7%和11%。

结论

由于脱垂复发,骶棘韧带子宫固定术的再次手术数量极高。

相似文献

1
Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques.原发性子宫脱垂的外科治疗:阴道自体组织手术技术的比较
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Nov;30(11):1887-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03950-9. Epub 2019 May 3.
2
Trends in apical prolapse surgery between 2010 and 2016 in Denmark.2010 年至 2016 年丹麦顶端脱垂手术趋势。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Feb;31(2):321-327. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3852-7. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
3
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.骶棘韧带固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗 2 度或以上子宫脱垂的疗效比较:多中心随机试验的随访观察。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
4
The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study.曼彻斯特-福瑟吉尔手术与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊式阴道子宫切除术的比较:一项匹配历史队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):431-440. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3519-9. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
5
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.骶棘韧带子宫固定术与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊的阴道子宫切除术治疗2期及以上子宫脱垂女性的多中心随机非劣效性试验
BMJ. 2015 Jul 23;351:h3717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3717.
6
Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.在一项骶棘韧带固定术联合移植物与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗女性的随机试验中,5 年内与复合手术失败相关的特征。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan;228(1):63.e1-63.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.048. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
7
The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.骶棘韧带子宫固定术及阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶韧带悬吊术对子宫脱垂女性性功能的影响:一项随机对照研究的二次分析
J Sex Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Surgical repair of vaginal vault prolapse; a comparison between ipsilateral uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation-a nationwide cohort study.阴道穹隆脱垂的手术修复;同侧子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术与骶棘韧带固定术的比较——一项全国性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jun;32(6):1441-1449. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04515-x. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
9
Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.经骶骨固定术或阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术后盆腔器官脱垂复发的危险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):252.e1-252.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.017. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
10
The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.曼彻斯特手术与经阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂的疗效综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jan;28(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3100-y. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment outcomes of Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy for mid-compartment prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis.曼彻斯特手术与经阴道子宫切除术治疗中盆腔器官脱垂的疗效比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 May;104(5):792-803. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15053. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
2
Native tissue repair of the female pelvic floor: A four-level surgical concept.女性盆底的自体组织修复:一种四级手术概念。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 May;169(2):587-591. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16109. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
3
Mostafa Maged sling technique to treat prolapsed uterus in an easy way (New Technique).

本文引用的文献

1
Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.保留子宫手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项系统评价及Meta分析与临床实践指南
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):505-522. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03876-2. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
2
Trends in apical prolapse surgery between 2010 and 2016 in Denmark.2010 年至 2016 年丹麦顶端脱垂手术趋势。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Feb;31(2):321-327. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3852-7. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
3
The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study.
Mostafa Maged 子宫脱垂简易悬吊术(新技术)。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2023 Sep;33(5):919-923. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v33i5.22.
4
Manchester Procedure vs Sacrospinous Hysteropexy for Treatment of Uterine Descent: A Randomized Clinical Trial.曼彻斯特手术与骶棘韧带固定术治疗子宫脱垂的随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Aug 15;330(7):626-635. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13140.
5
Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management.前路骶棘韧带子宫固定术:自体组织与网片增强修复术治疗原发性子宫阴道脱垂的比较
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Oct;34(10):2603-2609. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05589-z. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
6
Cervical cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study.曼彻斯特手术后的宫颈癌:一项全国性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Aug;34(8):1837-1842. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05481-w. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
7
Letter to the editor: Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Oct;33(10):2913-2914. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05330-2. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
8
Endometrial cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study.曼彻斯特手术后的子宫内膜癌:一项全国性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1881-1888. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05196-4. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
9
Recurrent surgery in uterine prolapse: A nationwide register study.复发性子宫脱垂手术:一项全国性登记研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 May;101(5):532-541. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14340. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
10
Vaginal vault prolapse and recurrent surgery: A nationwide observational cohort study.阴道穹隆脱垂和再次手术:一项全国性观察队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 May;101(5):542-549. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14341. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
曼彻斯特-福瑟吉尔手术与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊式阴道子宫切除术的比较:一项匹配历史队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):431-440. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3519-9. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
4
Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫脱垂手术治疗中子宫保留术与子宫切除术的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1617-1630. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3433-1. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
5
Danish Urogynaecological Database.丹麦泌尿妇科数据库。
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 25;8:709-712. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S99511. eCollection 2016.
6
The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.曼彻斯特手术与经阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂的疗效综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jan;28(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3100-y. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential.丹麦国家患者登记处:内容、数据质量及研究潜力综述
Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 17;7:449-90. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S91125. eCollection 2015.
8
The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology.丹麦民事登记系统在流行病学中的应用。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;29(8):541-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
9
Incidence and lifetime risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Denmark from 1977 to 2009.1977年至2009年丹麦盆腔器官脱垂手术的发病率及终生风险
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jan;26(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2413-y. Epub 2014 May 20.
10
The Danish Urogynaecological Database: establishment, completeness and validity.丹麦泌尿妇科数据库:建立、完整性与有效性
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jun;24(6):983-90. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1968-8. Epub 2012 Oct 17.