Oura Petteri, Eklin Aki, Sajantila Antti
Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Forensic Medicine Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Forensic Sci Res. 2023 Oct 10;8(3):198-201. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owad027. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Neuropathology consultations are an essential part of medico-legal cause-of-death investigations. However, there are little data on the rates of neuropathological examinations in medico-legal autopsies. The present nationwide, retrospective, register-based study aimed to report and compare neuropathology consultation rates (i.e. the percentages of medico-legal autopsies with a neuropathology consultation) in five Finnish regions from 2016 to 2021. The dataset comprised 50 457 medico-legal autopsies with 1 274 neuropathology consultations. Overall, ~1 in 40 autopsies (2.5%) involved a neuropathology consultation. Consultation rates were lowest in the Southern Finland region (1.4%) and highest in the Southwestern Finland and Åland region (6.5%). Throughout the study period, the consultation rates of Southwestern Finland and Åland were 1.5 to 9.4 times those of other regions ( < 0.001). In conclusion, this nationwide Finnish study identified substantial differences in neuropathology consultation rates between regions, which may indicate regional differences in conventions and policies. However, the "optimal" consultation rate remains unknown. Future studies are required to further understand the differences in autopsy practices within the Finnish context as well as in medico-legal institutions elsewhere.
There are little data on the rates of neuropathology consultations in medico-legal autopsies.This Finnish study characterized regional differences in neuropathology consultation rates between 2016 and 2021.Overall, 1 in 40 autopsies (2.5%) involved a neuropathology consultation.The consultation rates of Southwestern Finland and Åland were 1.5 to 9.4 times those of other regions.Our findings may reflect regional differences in conventions and policies.
神经病理学会诊是法医学死因调查的重要组成部分。然而,关于法医学尸检中神经病理学检查率的数据却很少。本项基于全国登记数据的回顾性研究旨在报告并比较2016年至2021年芬兰五个地区的神经病理学会诊率(即进行了神经病理学会诊的法医学尸检的百分比)。数据集包括50457例法医学尸检,其中1274例进行了神经病理学会诊。总体而言,约每40例尸检中有1例(2.5%)涉及神经病理学会诊。芬兰南部地区的会诊率最低(1.4%),芬兰西南部和奥兰地区的会诊率最高(6.5%)。在整个研究期间,芬兰西南部和奥兰地区的会诊率是其他地区的1.5至9.4倍(P<0.001)。总之,这项芬兰全国性研究发现各地区在神经病理学会诊率上存在显著差异,这可能表明在惯例和政策方面存在地区差异。然而,“最佳”会诊率仍未知。未来需要进一步研究,以更好地理解芬兰国内以及其他地方法医学机构在尸检实践上的差异。
关于法医学尸检中神经病理学会诊率的数据很少。这项芬兰研究描述了2016年至2021年期间神经病理学会诊率的地区差异。总体而言,每40例尸检中有1例(2.5%)涉及神经病理学会诊。芬兰西南部和奥兰地区的会诊率是其他地区的1.5至9.4倍。我们的研究结果可能反映了惯例和政策方面的地区差异。