• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对 FDA 销售点烟草公众教育活动的认知和接受程度。

Awareness of and receptivity to FDA's point-of-sale tobacco public education campaign.

机构信息

Center for Health Analytics, Media, and Policy, RTI International, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.

Center for Tobacco Products, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 13;18(7):e0288462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288462. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0288462
PMID:37440511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10343043/
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess awareness of and receptivity to FDA's point-of-sale (POS) tobacco public education campaign for adult cigarette smokers called Every Try Counts; it was the first multi-county POS campaign in the U.S. The design was a county-level treatment-control three-wave longitudinal design. The setting was 15 treatment and 15 control counties. Subjects were smokers ages 25 to 54 (N = 3,628). 4,145 individuals screened in as eligible; 3,628 (87.5% response rate) completed the Wave 1 questionnaire (Wave 2: n = 2,812; Wave 3: n = 2,571; retention 70.9%). Measures were self-reported brand and ad awareness (saw any ad a few times or more) and receptivity (5-item perceived effectiveness scale). The analysis included descriptive analyses of receptivity; bivariate analyses of awareness by treatment group; and covariate- and time-adjusted logistic regression models to determine changes in awareness attributable to the campaign. Receptivity was moderate and differed significantly by race/ethnicity. As was the case for all waves, at wave 3, ad awareness was significantly higher in treatment (53.3%) than control counties (36.1%, p < .05). In regression models, brand (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.26-1.86) and ad (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.39-2.16) awareness were significantly higher in treatment than control counties. Every Try Counts generated a moderate level of receptivity and attention from cigarette smokers. Limitations include self-reports of campaign awareness and generalizability to a small number of U.S. counties.

摘要

这项研究的目的是评估对 FDA 的销售点(POS)烟草公众教育活动的认知度和接受度,该活动针对成年吸烟者,名为“每一次尝试都算数”(Every Try Counts);这是美国第一个多县 POS 活动。设计为县级治疗对照三波纵向设计。地点是 15 个治疗县和 15 个对照县。研究对象是 25 至 54 岁的吸烟者(N=3628)。有 4145 人筛查合格;3628 人(87.5%的应答率)完成了第 1 波问卷(第 2 波:n=2812;第 3 波:n=2571;保留率 70.9%)。测量指标包括对品牌和广告的认知度(看到过几次或更多次广告)和接受度(5 项感知有效性量表)。分析包括对接受度的描述性分析;对治疗组的认知度进行双变量分析;以及协变量和时间调整的逻辑回归模型,以确定归因于该活动的认知度变化。接受度处于中等水平,且在种族/民族之间存在显著差异。与所有波次一样,在第 3 波次中,治疗组(53.3%)的广告认知度显著高于对照组(36.1%,p<0.05)。在回归模型中,品牌(OR=1.53,95%CI:1.26-1.86)和广告(OR=1.74,95%CI:1.39-2.16)认知度在治疗组中显著高于对照组。“每一次尝试都算数”活动引起了吸烟者的中等程度的接受度和关注度。限制因素包括对活动认知度的自我报告和对美国少数县的推广。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dad/10343043/76fb416fb4c3/pone.0288462.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dad/10343043/76fb416fb4c3/pone.0288462.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dad/10343043/76fb416fb4c3/pone.0288462.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Awareness of and receptivity to FDA's point-of-sale tobacco public education campaign.对 FDA 销售点烟草公众教育活动的认知和接受程度。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 13;18(7):e0288462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288462. eCollection 2023.
2
Reach, Receptivity, And Beliefs Associated With the Campaign to Prevent and Reduce Cigarette Use Among Youth in the United States.美国预防和减少青少年吸烟运动的覆盖面、接受度和相关信念。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Jun;36(5):789-800. doi: 10.1177/08901171211069991. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
3
Assessing tobacco marketing receptivity among youth: integrating point of sale marketing, cigarette package branding and branded merchandise.评估青少年对烟草营销的接受度:整合销售点营销、香烟包装品牌和品牌商品。
Tob Control. 2016 Nov;25(6):648-655. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052498. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
4
Awareness of and Receptivity to the Fresh Empire Tobacco Public Education Campaign Among Hip Hop Youth.嘻哈青年对新鲜帝国烟草公共教育活动的认知和接受度。
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Mar;66(3):301-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
5
Associations Between Exposure and Receptivity to Branded Cigarette Advertising and Subsequent Brand Preference Among US Young Adults.品牌香烟广告的接触和接受与美国年轻成年人随后的品牌偏好之间的关联。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 May 26;22(6):1030-1035. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz093.
6
LGBT young adults' awareness of and receptivity to the tobacco public education campaign.LGBT 年轻成年人对烟草公共教育运动的认知和接受程度。
Tob Control. 2021 Jan;30(1):63-70. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055239. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
7
"It Looks Like an Adult Sweetie Shop": Point-of-Sale Tobacco Display Exposure and Brand Awareness in Scottish Secondary School Students.“这看起来像一家成人糖果店”:苏格兰中学生接触销售点烟草展示与品牌认知情况
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Oct;18(10):1981-1988. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw032. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
Influence of tobacco marketing and exposure to smokers on adolescent susceptibility to smoking.烟草营销及接触吸烟者对青少年吸烟易感性的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Oct 18;87(20):1538-45. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.20.1538.
9
Visual Attention to the Source Matters: Using Eye Tracking to Understand the FDA's 'Every Try Counts' Campaign Message Effectiveness.对信息来源的视觉关注很重要:利用眼动追踪来理解美国食品药品监督管理局的“每一次尝试都重要”宣传活动信息的有效性。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Feb 1;24(2):280-284. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab185.
10
Youth Receptivity to FDA's The Real Cost Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Evidence From Message Pretesting.青少年对美国食品药品监督管理局“真实成本”烟草预防运动的接受度:来自信息预测试的证据
J Health Commun. 2016 Nov;21(11):1153-1160. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1233307. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Perceived Message Effectiveness Ratings Change in Response to Repeated Message Exposures?感知到的信息有效性评级会随着信息的重复曝光而改变吗?
Health Commun. 2025 Feb 28:1-9. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2025.2466115.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived Message Effectiveness and Campaign-Targeted Beliefs: Evidence of Reciprocal Effects in Youth Tobacco Prevention.感知信息效果与针对目标的信念:青少年烟草预防中相互影响的证据。
Health Commun. 2022 Mar;37(3):356-365. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1839202. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
2
Association Between the Tips From Former Smokers Campaign and Smoking Cessation Among Adults, United States, 2012-2018.《提示前吸烟者运动与美国成年人戒烟之间的关联,2012-2018 年》。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Aug 27;17:E97. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200052.
3
Tobacco Point-of-Sale Influence on U.S. Adult Smokers.
烟草销售点对美国成年烟民的影响。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020;31(1):249-264. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2020.0021.
4
LGBT young adults' awareness of and receptivity to the tobacco public education campaign.LGBT 年轻成年人对烟草公共教育运动的认知和接受程度。
Tob Control. 2021 Jan;30(1):63-70. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055239. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
5
Awareness of and Receptivity to the Fresh Empire Tobacco Public Education Campaign Among Hip Hop Youth.嘻哈青年对新鲜帝国烟草公共教育活动的认知和接受度。
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Mar;66(3):301-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
6
Antismoking Advertisements and Price Promotions and Their Association With the Urge to Smoke and Purchases in a Virtual Convenience Store: Randomized Experiment.反吸烟广告与价格促销及其与虚拟便利店中吸烟冲动和购买行为的关联:随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 23;21(10):e14143. doi: 10.2196/14143.
7
Evidence of the Impact of the Tips From Former Smokers Campaign: Results From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.《前吸烟者提示活动影响的证据:来自行为风险因素监测系统的结果》。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Oct 10;16:E137. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190110.
8
Pro-tobacco marketing and anti-tobacco campaigns aimed at vulnerable populations: A review of the literature.针对弱势群体的烟草促销与反烟草运动:文献综述
Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Sep 18;17:68. doi: 10.18332/tid/111397. eCollection 2019.
9
Smokers' Attention to Point-of-Sale Antismoking Ads: An Eye-tracking Study.吸烟者对销售点反吸烟广告的关注:一项眼动追踪研究。
Tob Regul Sci. 2018 Jan;4(1):631-643. doi: 10.18001/TRS.4.1.9. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
10
Deception and Shopping Behavior Among Current Cigarette Smokers: A Web-Based, Randomized Virtual Shopping Experiment.当前吸烟者中的欺骗行为与购物行为:一项基于网络的随机虚拟购物实验。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jun 29;7(6):e10468. doi: 10.2196/10468.