Suppr超能文献

定时炸弹。家族性乳腺癌-卵巢癌基因风险预测背景下的健康素养;一项定性研究。

The ticking time-bomb. Health literacy in the context of genetic risk prediction in familial breast-ovarian cancer; A qualitative study.

作者信息

Lorke Mariya, Harzheim Laura, Rhiem Kerstin, Woopen Christiane, Jünger Saskia

机构信息

Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health (CERES), University of Cologne and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne.

Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne.

出版信息

Qual Res Med Healthc. 2021 Oct 5;5(2):9647. doi: 10.4081/qrmh.2021.9647.

Abstract

Personalised methods of predicting breast and ovarian cancer risk through genetic testing increasingly demand a person's understanding and critical appraisal of risk-related information, as well as decision-making and acting upon disclosure of a positive test result. The current study aims at understanding health literacy (HL) among persons at risk of developing familial breast-ovarian cancer (FBOC) from a bottom-up perspective-incorporating their viewpoints into the research process. Its qualitative design integrates an ethnographic-narrative approach and findings from 10 narrative interviews with women who have undergone genetic testing, analysed by using reflexive grounded theory. The collected data reveal the entanglement of the women's perceptions concerning the risk of getting ill, their identity, and their strategies of managing health. The analysis of this interplay provides an empirical basis for approaching HL in its communicative dimension, considering individuals' understandings of health and illness, and emphasizing the role of critical HL.

摘要

通过基因检测预测乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险的个性化方法,越来越需要人们理解并批判性地评估与风险相关的信息,以及在检测结果呈阳性时进行决策并采取行动。当前的研究旨在从自下而上的角度理解有患家族性乳腺癌-卵巢癌(FBOC)风险人群的健康素养(HL),即将他们的观点纳入研究过程。其定性设计整合了人种志叙事方法以及对10名接受过基因检测的女性进行叙事访谈的结果,并采用反思性扎根理论进行分析。收集到的数据揭示了这些女性在患病风险认知、自身身份认同以及健康管理策略方面的纠结。对这种相互作用的分析为从交流维度探讨健康素养提供了实证依据,考虑到个体对健康和疾病的理解,并强调批判性健康素养的作用。

相似文献

3
Health Literacy in Individuals at Risk for Alzheimer's Dementia: A Systematic Review.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2020;7(1):47-55. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2019.34.
5
Maximising survival: the main concern of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who undergo genetic testing for BRCA1/2.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Aug;18(4):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
6
Health literacy in persons at risk of and patients with coronary heart disease: A systematic review.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112711. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112711. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
9
Women's responses and understanding of polygenic breast cancer risk information.
Fam Cancer. 2020 Oct;19(4):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s10689-020-00185-2.
10
Factors shaping at-risk individuals' decisions to undergo genetic testing for cancer in Asia.
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Sep;28(5):1569-1577. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12981. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial.
Qual Res Med Healthc. 2021 Oct 5;5(2):10168. doi: 10.4081/qrmh.2021.10168.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the meaning of health literacy? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.
Fam Med Community Health. 2020 May;8(2). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000351.
4
Health literacy as a social practice: Social and empirical dimensions of knowledge on health and healthcare.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.024. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
5
Reframing the conversation about contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: Preparing women for postsurgical realities.
Psychooncology. 2019 Feb;28(2):394-400. doi: 10.1002/pon.4955. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
6
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
8
Organizational Health Literacy: Review of Theories, Frameworks, Guides, and Implementation Issues.
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018757848. doi: 10.1177/0046958018757848.
10
NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Decision-Making Project-1 Results: Decision Making in Breast Cancer Risk Reduction.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2017 Nov;10(11):625-634. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-17-0076. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验