一项针对使用心理模拟和全规模模拟来实践本科护理学生医疗保健决策技能的范围综述的方案。
A protocol for a scoping review of the use of mental simulation and full-scale simulation in practising healthcare decision-making skills of undergraduate nursing students.
机构信息
School of Health and Social Work University of Hertfordshire Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
School of Health and Social Work University of Hertfordshire Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK; East & North Herts NHS Trust Stevenage, UK.
出版信息
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Aug;71:103699. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103699. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
AIM
This scoping review aims to explore the effect of FSS and mental simulation on the decision-making skills of nursing students.
BACKGROUND
Full-scale simulation (FSS) has been the most used simulation modality in nursing education due to its applicability to enhance both technical and non-technical skills. However, FSS can be excessively costly and other factors such as technophobia and lack of trained staff and support make FSS less accessible, especially for nursing education. Therefore, a novel mental simulation that is interactive and supported by visual elements can be a substitute for FSS, at least for some of the skills, such as clinical decision-making. Reviews comparing the effectiveness of FSS and mental simulation on decision-making skills in nursing students are lacking. Further knowledge on the effectiveness of these two modalities on decision-making skills for nursing students is needed to inform the nursing education curriculum and to decide between the two modalities.
DESIGN
This protocol adheres to the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-scr) checklist.
METHOD
The methodological framework for scoping reviews will be followed for this scoping review. Scopus, EBSCOhost the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE and for the grey literature ERIC and BASE will be searched for related studies. The search will be limited to January 2008 and April 2023 (up-to-date) and English. A detailed search strategy was developed with an experienced research information manager and this strategy will be adapted to each database. A single screening will be performed by an author who will screen all abstracts and titles and full-text publications. After the study selection step of the framework, the data from the included studies will be charted using a data extraction form. The data will be synthesised by comparing the effect of FSS and mental simulation on decision-making skills.
CONCLUSION
A synopsis of the publication on FSS and mental simulation on nurse students' decision-making skills will be useful for stakeholders when choosing between two modalities to deliver decision-making skills to nursing students and also help to inform the nursing education and simulation practice.
SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION
Protocols.io (doi: 10.17504/protocols.io.e6nvw57y7vmk/v1).
目的
本范围综述旨在探讨全面模拟（FSS）和心理模拟对护理学生决策技能的影响。
背景
由于全面模拟（FSS）适用于增强技术和非技术技能，因此它是护理教育中使用最广泛的模拟模式。然而，FSS 可能过于昂贵，并且其他因素（如技术恐惧症、缺乏经过培训的人员和支持）使得 FSS 的可及性降低，尤其是在护理教育中。因此，一种新的、具有交互性并由视觉元素支持的心理模拟可以替代 FSS，至少可以替代一些技能，例如临床决策。比较 FSS 和心理模拟对护理学生决策技能影响的综述较少。需要进一步了解这两种模式对护理学生决策技能的有效性，以便为护理教育课程提供信息，并在这两种模式之间做出决策。
设计
本方案遵循扩展的 PRISMA 范围综述（PRISMA-scr）清单中的指南。
方法
将遵循范围综述的方法框架进行这项范围综述。将在 Scopus、EBSCOhost 循证护理和相关综合数据库（CINAHL）、MEDLINE 和灰色文献 ERIC 和 BASE 中搜索相关研究。搜索将限于 2008 年 1 月至 2023 年 4 月（最新）和英语。一位经验丰富的研究信息经理制定了详细的搜索策略，该策略将适应每个数据库。一位作者将对所有摘要和标题以及全文出版物进行单一筛选。在框架的研究选择步骤之后，将使用数据提取表对纳入研究的数据进行图表绘制。通过比较 FSS 和心理模拟对决策技能的影响，对纳入研究的数据进行综合。
结论
总结 FSS 和心理模拟对护理学生决策技能影响的出版物，对于利益相关者在选择两种模式向护理学生传授决策技能时将非常有用，同时也有助于为护理教育和模拟实践提供信息。
范围综述注册
Protocols.io（doi: 10.17504/protocols.io.e6nvw57y7vmk/v1）。
Zotero 插件