Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Pharmacy, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
J Pain. 2023 Nov;24(11):1905-1914. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
Transdermal buprenorphine (TBUP) may have some advantages for the management of acute postoperative pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of TBUP compared to other analgesics or placebo for acute postoperative pain. A systematic search was conducted using Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) until December 26, 2022. The search included randomized controlled trials comparing TBUP versus other analgesics or placebo for acute postoperative pain. A certainty assessment was conducted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. The protocol for this review was registered on Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022318601). In total, 15 studies involving 1,205 participants were included that compared TBUP versus fentanyl (n = 2), celecoxib (n = 3), placebo (n = 2), tramadol (n = 5), diclofenac (n = 3), parecoxib (n = 1), and flurbiprofen (n = 1). Meta-analyses were conducted for 3 comparators that involved 2 studies each. There was no significant difference in pain between TBUP 10 mcg/h versus fentanyl 25 mcg/h (standardized mean difference [SMD] -.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] -.86 to .81, P = .95, I = 85%). TBUP 10 mcg/h was associated with less pain compared to celecoxib 200 mg twice daily (SMD -.32, 95% CI -.58 to -.05, P = .02, I = 0%) and placebo (SMD -2.29, 95% CI -4.32 to -.27, P = .03, I = 94%). The GRADE assessment showed a very low certainty of evidence for all comparisons. There is insufficient evidence that TBUP improves pain control compared to other analgesics for acute postoperative pain. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the use of TBUP to other analgesics for postoperative pain. The results showed that there is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of TBUP in this setting. The findings will help clinicians select the most appropriate opioid regimens for postoperative pain.
经皮丁丙诺啡(TBUP)在急性术后疼痛管理中可能具有一些优势。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是研究 TBUP 与其他镇痛药或安慰剂相比用于急性术后疼痛的疗效和安全性。使用 Embase、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)进行了系统检索,截至 2022 年 12 月 26 日。检索包括比较 TBUP 与其他镇痛药或安慰剂用于急性术后疼痛的随机对照试验。使用推荐评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法进行确定性评估。该综述的方案已在前瞻性系统评价注册库(CRD42022318601)中注册。共纳入 15 项研究,涉及 1205 名参与者,比较了 TBUP 与芬太尼(n=2)、塞来昔布(n=3)、安慰剂(n=2)、曲马多(n=5)、双氯芬酸(n=3)、帕瑞昔布(n=1)和氟比洛芬(n=1)。对涉及 2 项研究的 3 种对照剂进行了荟萃分析。TBUP 10 mcg/h 与芬太尼 25 mcg/h 之间的疼痛无显著差异(标准化均数差[SMD]-.03,95%置信区间[CI]-.86 至.81,P=.95,I=85%)。与塞来昔布 200mg 每日 2 次(SMD-.32,95%CI-.58 至-.05,P=.02,I=0%)和安慰剂(SMD-2.29,95%CI-4.32 至-.27,P=.03,I=94%)相比,TBUP 10 mcg/h 疼痛程度较低。GRADE 评估显示所有比较的证据确定性均非常低。尚无足够证据表明 TBUP 可改善急性术后疼痛的镇痛效果。观点:本系统评价和荟萃分析比较了 TBUP 与其他镇痛药在术后疼痛中的应用。结果表明,目前尚无足够证据推荐在这种情况下使用 TBUP。研究结果将有助于临床医生为术后疼痛选择最合适的阿片类药物治疗方案。