• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种以最低呼吸功和呼吸力为目标的闭环通气模式可降低中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的跨肺驱动压。

A closed-loop ventilation mode that targets the lowest work and force of breathing reduces the transpulmonary driving pressure in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.

作者信息

Buiteman-Kruizinga Laura A, van Meenen David M P, Bos Lieuwe D J, van der Heiden Pim L J, Paulus Frederique, Schultz Marcus J

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.

Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location 'AMC', Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023 Jul 14;11(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40635-023-00527-1.

DOI:10.1186/s40635-023-00527-1
PMID:37442844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10344850/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The driving pressure (ΔP) has an independent association with outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). INTELLiVENT-Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) is a closed-loop mode of ventilation that targets the lowest work and force of breathing.

AIM

To compare transpulmonary and respiratory system ΔP between closed-loop ventilation and conventional pressure controlled ventilation in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.

METHODS

Single-center randomized cross-over clinical trial in patients in the early phase of ARDS. Patients were randomly assigned to start with a 4-h period of closed-loop ventilation or conventional ventilation, after which the alternate ventilation mode was selected. The primary outcome was the transpulmonary ΔP; secondary outcomes included respiratory system ΔP, and other key parameters of ventilation.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were included, and all had fully analyzable data sets. Compared to conventional ventilation, with closed-loop ventilation the median transpulmonary ΔP with was lower (7.0 [5.0-10.0] vs. 10.0 [8.0-11.0] cmHO, mean difference - 2.5 [95% CI - 2.6 to - 2.1] cmHO; P = 0.0001). Inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and the respiratory rate were also lower. Tidal volume, however, was higher with closed-loop ventilation, but stayed below generally accepted safety cutoffs in the majority of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small physiological study, when compared to conventional pressure controlled ventilation INTELLiVENT-ASV reduced the transpulmonary ΔP in patients in the early phase of moderate-to-severe ARDS. This closed-loop ventilation mode also led to a lower inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and a lower respiratory rate, thereby reducing the intensity of ventilation. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03211494, July 7, 2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03211494?term=airdrop&draw=2&rank=1 .

摘要

引言

驱动压力(ΔP)与急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的预后独立相关。INTELLiVENT-自适应支持通气(ASV)是一种闭环通气模式,旨在实现最低的呼吸功和呼吸力。

目的

比较中重度ARDS患者在闭环通气和传统压力控制通气时的跨肺和呼吸系统ΔP。

方法

对处于ARDS早期的患者进行单中心随机交叉临床试验。患者被随机分配先进行4小时的闭环通气或传统通气,之后选择交替的通气模式。主要结局是跨肺ΔP;次要结局包括呼吸系统ΔP以及其他关键通气参数。

结果

纳入13例患者,所有患者均有可完全分析的数据集。与传统通气相比,闭环通气时跨肺ΔP的中位数更低(7.0[5.0 - 10.0] vs. 10.0[8.0 - 11.0] cmH₂O,平均差值 -2.5[95%CI -2.6至 -2.1] cmH₂O;P = 0.0001)。吸气跨肺压和呼吸频率也更低。然而,闭环通气时潮气量更高,但大多数患者的潮气量仍低于普遍接受的安全阈值。

结论

在这项小型生理学研究中,与传统压力控制通气相比,INTELLiVENT-ASV降低了中重度ARDS早期患者的跨肺ΔP。这种闭环通气模式还导致吸气跨肺压和呼吸频率降低,从而降低了通气强度。试验注册Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT03211494,2017年7月7日。https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03211494?term=airdrop&draw=2&rank=1 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/916d/10344850/603e4e8e57b8/40635_2023_527_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/916d/10344850/17275308bbdd/40635_2023_527_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/916d/10344850/bdee00d89092/40635_2023_527_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/916d/10344850/603e4e8e57b8/40635_2023_527_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/916d/10344850/17275308bbdd/40635_2023_527_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/916d/10344850/bdee00d89092/40635_2023_527_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/916d/10344850/603e4e8e57b8/40635_2023_527_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A closed-loop ventilation mode that targets the lowest work and force of breathing reduces the transpulmonary driving pressure in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.一种以最低呼吸功和呼吸力为目标的闭环通气模式可降低中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的跨肺驱动压。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023 Jul 14;11(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40635-023-00527-1.
2
Effect of INTELLiVENT-ASV versus Conventional Ventilation on Ventilation Intensity in Patients with COVID-19 ARDS-An Observational Study.INTELLiVENT-ASV与传统通气对新型冠状病毒肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者通气强度的影响——一项观察性研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 19;10(22):5409. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225409.
3
Airway and transpulmonary driving pressures and mechanical powers selected by INTELLiVENT-ASV in passive, mechanically ventilated ICU patients.被动机械通气 ICU 患者中 INTELLiVENT-ASV 选择的气道和跨肺驱动压及机械功率。
Heart Lung. 2020 Jul-Aug;49(4):427-434. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
4
Randomized crossover trial to compare driving pressures in a closed-loop and a conventional mechanical ventilation mode in pediatric patients.随机交叉试验比较小儿患者闭环与常规机械通气模式下的驱动压。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Sep;56(9):3035-3043. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25561. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
5
Adaptive Support Ventilation and Lung-Protective Ventilation in ARDS.适应性支持通气和急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的肺保护性通气。
Respir Care. 2022 Dec;67(12):1542-1550. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10159. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
6
Effects of Different Levels of Variability and Pressure Support Ventilation on Lung Function in Patients With Mild-Moderate Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.不同程度的变异性和压力支持通气对轻中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者肺功能的影响
Front Physiol. 2021 Oct 22;12:725738. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.725738. eCollection 2021.
7
Closed-loop ventilation in COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure-A case series.COVID-19 患者急性低氧性呼吸衰竭的闭环通气:病例系列。
Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Jan;29(1):219-225. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12924. Epub 2023 May 5.
8
Effect of Automated Closed-loop ventilation versus convenTional VEntilation on duration and quality of ventilation in critically ill patients (ACTiVE) - study protocol of a randomized clinical trial.自动闭环通气与常规通气对危重症患者通气时间和质量影响的比较(ACTiVE):一项随机临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Apr 23;23(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06286-w.
9
Closed-Loop Versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in COVID-19 ARDS.新冠肺炎所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的闭环通气与常规机械通气比较。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):1184-1193. doi: 10.1177/08850666211024139. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
10
Adaptive mechanical ventilation with automated minimization of mechanical power-a pilot randomized cross-over study.自适应机械通气与机械功率最小化自动化:一项先导随机交叉研究。
Crit Care. 2019 Oct 30;23(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2610-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of ventilation volumes, pressures and rates with the mechanical power of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: exploring the impact of rate reduction.无急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的通气量、压力和频率与通气机械功率的关系:探讨降低频率的影响
Anaesthesia. 2025 May;80(5):533-542. doi: 10.1111/anae.16537. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
2
Unveiling the Influence of AI on Advancements in Respiratory Care: Narrative Review.揭示人工智能对呼吸护理进展的影响:叙述性综述
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Dec 20;13:e57271. doi: 10.2196/57271.
3
Challenges in Transitioning from Controlled to Assisted Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Management.

本文引用的文献

1
The (Mechanical) Power of (Automated) Ventilation.(自动)通气的(机械)动力
Respir Care. 2023 Apr;68(4):556. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10531.
2
Adaptive Support Ventilation and Lung-Protective Ventilation in ARDS.适应性支持通气和急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的肺保护性通气。
Respir Care. 2022 Dec;67(12):1542-1550. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10159. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
3
Monitoring Lung Injury Severity and Ventilation Intensity during Mechanical Ventilation.监测机械通气期间的肺损伤严重程度和通气强度。
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)管理中从控制通气转换为辅助通气的挑战。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 2;13(23):7333. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237333.
4
Effect of automated versus conventional ventilation on mechanical power of ventilation-A randomized crossover clinical trial.自动通气与常规通气对通气机械功的影响:一项随机交叉临床试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 30;19(7):e0307155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307155. eCollection 2024.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun;43(3):346-368. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748917. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
4
Automation to improve lung protection.自动化以改善肺保护。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jul;48(7):943-946. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06719-9. Epub 2022 May 20.
5
Effect of INTELLiVENT-ASV versus Conventional Ventilation on Ventilation Intensity in Patients with COVID-19 ARDS-An Observational Study.INTELLiVENT-ASV与传统通气对新型冠状病毒肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者通气强度的影响——一项观察性研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 19;10(22):5409. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225409.
6
Closed-Loop Versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in COVID-19 ARDS.新冠肺炎所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的闭环通气与常规机械通气比较。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):1184-1193. doi: 10.1177/08850666211024139. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
7
Ventilatory Variables and Mechanical Power in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的通气变量和机械功率。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Aug 1;204(3):303-311. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3467OC.
8
Effect of Lowering Vt on Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Varies with Respiratory System Elastance.降低急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者潮气量对死亡率的影响与呼吸系统顺应性有关。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;203(11):1378-1385. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3536OC.
9
The predictive validity for mortality of the driving pressure and the mechanical power of ventilation.驱动压力和通气机械功率对死亡率的预测效度。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 Dec 18;8(Suppl 1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00346-8.
10
Fully automated postoperative ventilation in cardiac surgery patients: a randomised clinical trial.心脏外科手术患者的全自动术后通气:一项随机临床试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):739-749. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.037. Epub 2020 Jul 30.