• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动闭环通气与常规通气对危重症患者通气时间和质量影响的比较(ACTiVE):一项随机临床试验研究方案。

Effect of Automated Closed-loop ventilation versus convenTional VEntilation on duration and quality of ventilation in critically ill patients (ACTiVE) - study protocol of a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Intensive Care, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2022 Apr 23;23(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06286-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-06286-w
PMID:35461264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9034629/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

INTELLiVENT-Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) is a fully automated closed-loop mode of ventilation for use in critically ill patients. Evidence for benefit of INTELLiVENT-ASV in comparison to ventilation that is not fully automated with regard to duration of ventilation and quality of breathing is largely lacking. We test the hypothesis that INTELLiVENT-ASV shortens time spent on a ventilator and improves the quality of breathing.

METHODS

The "Effects of Automated Closed-loop VenTilation versus Conventional Ventilation on Duration and Quality of Ventilation" (ACTiVE) study is an international, multicenter, two-group randomized clinical superiority trial. In total, 1200 intensive care unit (ICU) patients with an anticipated duration of ventilation of > 24 h will be randomly assigned to one of the two ventilation strategies. Investigators screen patients aged 18 years or older at start of invasive ventilation in the ICU. Patients either receive automated ventilation by means of INTELLiVENT-ASV, or ventilation that is not automated by means of a conventional ventilation mode. The primary endpoint is the number of days free from ventilation and alive at day 28; secondary endpoints are quality of breathing using granular breath-by-breath analysis of ventilation parameters and variables in a time frame of 24 h early after the start of invasive ventilation, duration of ventilation in survivors, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and mortality rates in the ICU and hospital, and at 28 and 90 days.

DISCUSSION

ACTiVE is one of the first randomized clinical trials that is adequately powered to compare the effects of automated closed-loop ventilation versus conventional ventilation on duration of ventilation and quality of breathing in invasively ventilated critically ill patients. The results of ACTiVE will support intensivist in their choices regarding the use of automated ventilation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTiVE is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (study identifier: NCT04593810 ) on 20 October 2020.

摘要

背景

INTELLiVENT-自适应支持通气(ASV)是一种用于重症患者的完全自动化闭环通气模式。关于 INTELLiVENT-ASV 与不完全自动化通气相比在通气持续时间和呼吸质量方面的益处的证据在很大程度上仍然缺乏。我们检验了 INTELLiVENT-ASV 可缩短机械通气时间并改善呼吸质量的假设。

方法

“自动化闭环通气与常规通气对通气时间和质量的影响”(ACTiVE)研究是一项国际性、多中心、两组随机临床优效性试验。总共将有 1200 名预计通气时间超过 24 小时的重症监护病房(ICU)患者被随机分配到两种通气策略之一。研究者筛选 ICU 开始有创通气时年龄在 18 岁或以上的患者。患者要么接受 INTELLiVENT-ASV 的自动通气,要么接受常规通气模式的非自动通气。主要终点是第 28 天无通气且存活的天数;次要终点是使用通气参数的逐次呼吸粒度分析和早期开始有创通气 24 小时内的通气变量来评估呼吸质量,以及幸存者的通气持续时间、ICU 和住院时长(LOS)以及 ICU 和医院的死亡率,以及 28 天和 90 天的死亡率。

讨论

ACTiVE 是第一项在比较自动闭环通气与常规通气对接受有创通气的重症患者通气持续时间和呼吸质量影响方面具有足够效能的随机临床试验之一。ACTiVE 的结果将支持重症监护医生在使用自动通气方面做出选择。

试验注册

ACTiVE 于 2020 年 10 月 20 日在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册(研究标识符:NCT04593810)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9034629/6770431b57e0/13063_2022_6286_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9034629/903cc2a60978/13063_2022_6286_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9034629/6770431b57e0/13063_2022_6286_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9034629/903cc2a60978/13063_2022_6286_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b42/9034629/6770431b57e0/13063_2022_6286_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Automated Closed-loop ventilation versus convenTional VEntilation on duration and quality of ventilation in critically ill patients (ACTiVE) - study protocol of a randomized clinical trial.自动闭环通气与常规通气对危重症患者通气时间和质量影响的比较(ACTiVE):一项随机临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Apr 23;23(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06286-w.
2
POStoperative INTELLiVENT-adaptive support VEntilation in cardiac surgery patients (POSITiVE) II-study protocol of a randomized clinical trial.心脏手术患者术后 INTELLiVENT-adaptive 支持通气(POSITiVE)试验:一项随机临床试验的研究方案 II 期
Trials. 2024 Jul 3;25(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08296-2.
3
Automated versus non-automated weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation for critically ill adults and children.采用自动化与非自动化撤机方式以缩短危重症成人和儿童机械通气时间
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;2014(6):CD009235. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009235.pub3.
4
Automated versus non-automated weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation for critically ill adults and children.自动化与非自动化撤机对缩短危重症成人和儿童机械通气时间的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6(6):CD009235. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009235.pub2.
5
Automated weaning and SBT systems versus non-automated weaning strategies for weaning time in invasively ventilated critically ill adults.针对有创通气的危重症成年患者,比较自动撤机和自主呼吸试验(SBT)系统与非自动撤机策略对撤机时间的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 9;2014(9):CD008638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008638.pub2.
6
Closed-loop ventilation mode (IntelliVent®-ASV) in intensive care unit: a randomized trial.重症监护病房闭环通气模式(IntelliVent®-ASV):一项随机试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Jun;82(6):657-68. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
7
Effect of automated versus conventional ventilation on mechanical power of ventilation-A randomized crossover clinical trial.自动通气与常规通气对通气机械功的影响:一项随机交叉临床试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 30;19(7):e0307155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307155. eCollection 2024.
8
Effectiveness, safety and efficacy of INTELLiVENT-adaptive support ventilation, a closed-loop ventilation mode for use in ICU patients - a systematic review.INTELLiVENT-自适应支持通气在 ICU 患者中应用的效果、安全性和疗效 - 系统评价。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021 Nov;15(11):1403-1413. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1933450. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
9
Closed loop ventilation mode in Intensive Care Unit: a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the numbers of manual ventilator setting changes.重症监护病房中的闭环通气模式:一项比较手动呼吸机设置更改次数的随机对照临床试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jan;84(1):58-67. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11963-2. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
10
Multi-centre, three arm, randomized controlled trial on the use of methylprednisolone and unfractionated heparin in critically ill ventilated patients with pneumonia from SARS-CoV-2 infection: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.多中心、三臂、随机对照试验研究甲泼尼龙和普通肝素在 SARS-CoV-2 感染肺炎危重症机械通气患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Aug 17;21(1):724. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04645-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation: a nationwide survey among intensive care units in the Netherlands.脱离有创机械通气:荷兰重症监护病房的全国性调查。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jul 21;12(1):e002868. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002868.
2
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury: The Unseen Challenge in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Management.呼吸机相关性肺损伤:急性呼吸窘迫综合征管理中无形的挑战
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 2;14(11):3910. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113910.
3
Effect of automated versus conventional ventilation on mechanical power of ventilation-A randomized crossover clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness, safety and efficacy of INTELLiVENT-adaptive support ventilation, a closed-loop ventilation mode for use in ICU patients - a systematic review.INTELLiVENT-自适应支持通气在 ICU 患者中应用的效果、安全性和疗效 - 系统评价。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021 Nov;15(11):1403-1413. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1933450. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
2
Fully automated postoperative ventilation in cardiac surgery patients: a randomised clinical trial.心脏外科手术患者的全自动术后通气:一项随机临床试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):739-749. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.037. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
3
Time-varying intensity of mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure: a registry-based, prospective cohort study.
自动通气与常规通气对通气机械功的影响:一项随机交叉临床试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 30;19(7):e0307155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307155. eCollection 2024.
4
POStoperative INTELLiVENT-adaptive support VEntilation in cardiac surgery patients (POSITiVE) II-study protocol of a randomized clinical trial.心脏手术患者术后 INTELLiVENT-adaptive 支持通气(POSITiVE)试验:一项随机临床试验的研究方案 II 期
Trials. 2024 Jul 3;25(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08296-2.
5
Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Success in Patients with Respiratory Failure, Including Those with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.利用人工智能预测呼吸衰竭患者(包括急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者)机械通气撤机成功率
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 5;13(5):1505. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051505.
6
Closed-Loop ventilation using sidestream versus mainstream capnography for automated adjustments of minute ventilation-A randomized clinical trial in cardiac surgery patients.闭环通气使用旁流与主流二氧化碳描记术用于自动调整分钟通气量-心脏手术患者的随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 23;18(8):e0289412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289412. eCollection 2023.
机械通气强度随时间变化与急性呼吸衰竭患者死亡率的关系:基于注册的前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):905-913. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30325-8. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
4
Effect of a Low vs Intermediate Tidal Volume Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in Intensive Care Unit Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial.低潮气量与中潮气量策略对无急性呼吸窘迫综合征的 ICU 患者呼吸机使用天数的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1872-1880. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14280.
5
Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: an analysis of patients in two observational cohorts.通气的机械动力与危重症患者的死亡率相关:对两个观察队列患者的分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1914-1922. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5375-6. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
6
Potentially modifiable respiratory variables contributing to outcome in ICU patients without ARDS: a secondary analysis of PRoVENT.在无急性呼吸窘迫综合征的重症监护病房患者中,可能影响预后的可调节呼吸变量:PRoVENT研究的二次分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Mar 21;8(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0385-7.
7
Effect of On-Demand vs Routine Nebulization of Acetylcysteine With Salbutamol on Ventilator-Free Days in Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Invasive Ventilation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.按需使用与常规雾化吸入乙酰半胱氨酸联合沙丁胺醇对接受有创通气的重症监护病房患者无呼吸机天数的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):993-1001. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0949.
8
Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.肺复张与滴定式呼气末正压通气(PEEP)对比低PEEP对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1335-1345. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14171.
9
Critical illness-associated diaphragm weakness.危重病相关膈肌无力。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1441-1452. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4928-4. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
Closed loop ventilation mode in Intensive Care Unit: a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the numbers of manual ventilator setting changes.重症监护病房中的闭环通气模式:一项比较手动呼吸机设置更改次数的随机对照临床试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jan;84(1):58-67. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11963-2. Epub 2017 Jul 5.