Suppr超能文献

英国初级保健中 65 岁及以上人群药物评估的频率和影响:一项使用电子健康记录的观察性研究。

Frequency and impact of medication reviews for people aged 65 years or above in UK primary care: an observational study using electronic health records.

机构信息

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

National Institute for Health and Care Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jul 14;23(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04143-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication reviews in primary care provide an opportunity to review and discuss the safety and appropriateness of a person's medicines. However, there is limited evidence about access to and the impact of routine medication reviews for older adults in the general population, particularly in the UK. We aimed to quantify the proportion of people aged 65 years and over with a medication review recorded in 2019 and describe changes in the numbers and types of medicines prescribed following a review.

METHODS

We used anonymised primary care electronic health records from the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD GOLD) to define a population of people aged 65 years or over in 2019. We counted people with a medication review record in 2019 and used Cox regression to estimate associations between demographic characteristics, diagnoses, and prescribed medicines and having a medication review. We used linear regression to compare the number of medicines prescribed as repeat prescriptions in the three months before and after a medication review. Specifically, we compared the 'prescription count' - the maximum number of different medicines with overlapping prescriptions people had in each period.

RESULTS

Of 591,726 people prescribed one or more medicines at baseline, 305,526 (51.6%) had a recorded medication review in 2019. Living in a care home (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.40-1.62), medication review in the previous year (1.83, 1.69-1.98), and baseline prescription count (e.g. 5-9 vs 1 medicine 1.41, 1.37-1.46) were strongly associated with having a medication review in 2019. Overall, the prescription count tended to increase after a review (mean change 0.13 medicines, 95% CI 0.12-0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Although medication reviews were commonly recorded for people aged 65 years or over, there was little change overall in the numbers and types of medicines prescribed following a review. This study did not examine whether the prescriptions were appropriate or other metrics, such as dose or medicine changes within the same class. However, by examining the impact of medication reviews before the introduction of structured medication review requirements in England in 2020, it provides a useful benchmark which these new reviews can be compared with.

摘要

背景

初级保健中的药物审查为审查和讨论一个人的药物的安全性和适当性提供了机会。然而,关于普通人群中老年人的常规药物审查的可及性和影响,尤其是在英国,证据有限。我们旨在量化 2019 年记录在案的 65 岁及以上人群中接受药物审查的比例,并描述审查后开具的药物数量和类型的变化。

方法

我们使用英国临床实践研究数据链 (CPRD GOLD) 的匿名初级保健电子健康记录来定义 2019 年 65 岁及以上的人群。我们统计了 2019 年有药物审查记录的人群,并使用 Cox 回归估计人口统计学特征、诊断和开具的药物与药物审查之间的关联。我们使用线性回归比较药物审查前后三个月内重复处方开具的药物数量。具体来说,我们比较了“处方数量”——每个时期重叠处方中不同药物的最大数量。

结果

在基线时,591726 人开具了一种或多种药物,其中 305526 人(51.6%)在 2019 年进行了记录的药物审查。住在养老院(危险比 1.51,95%置信区间 1.40-1.62)、前一年的药物审查(1.83,1.69-1.98)和基线处方数量(例如 5-9 种与 1 种药物 1.41,1.37-1.46)与 2019 年进行药物审查密切相关。总体而言,审查后处方数量趋于增加(平均变化 0.13 种药物,95%CI 0.12-0.14)。

结论

尽管对 65 岁及以上人群的药物审查记录普遍,但审查后开具的药物数量和类型总体上几乎没有变化。本研究没有检查处方是否合适或其他指标,例如同一类药物内的剂量或药物变化。然而,通过检查 2020 年英格兰实施结构化药物审查要求之前的药物审查影响,它提供了一个有用的基准,可以与这些新的审查进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9783/10347807/d77befc0a2f5/12877_2023_4143_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验