Suppr超能文献

使用 cobas Liat 和 eazyplex 快速分子检测法对急诊科患者进行新型冠状病毒 2 型检测

SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Patients Using cobas Liat and eazyplex Rapid Molecular Assays.

作者信息

Egerer Renate, Edel Birgit, Hornung Franziska, Deinhardt-Emmer Stefanie, Baier Michael, Lewejohann Jan-Christoph, Pfister Wolfgang, Löffler Bettina, Rödel Jürgen

机构信息

Institute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, 07747 Jena, Germany.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, 07747 Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 1;13(13):2245. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132245.

Abstract

Rapid testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) of patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) facilitates the decision for isolation on admission to hospital wards. Differences in the sensitivity of molecular assays have implications for diagnostic workflows. This study evaluated the performance of the cobas Liat RT-PCR, which is routinely used as the initial test for ED patients in our hospitals, compared with the eazyplex RT-LAMP. A total of 378 oropharyngeal and nasal swabs with positive Liat results were analysed. Residual sample aliquots were tested using NeuMoDx™, cobas RT-PCR, and the eazyplex assay. Patients were divided into asymptomatic (n = 157) and symptomatic (n = 221) groups according to the WHO case definition. Overall, 14% of positive Liat results were not confirmed by RT-PCR. These samples were mainly attributed to 26.8% of asymptomatic patients, compared to 3.8% of the symptomatic group. Therefore, positive Liat results were used to provisionally isolate patients in the ED until RT-PCR results were available. The eazyplex assay identified 62% and 90.6% of RT-PCR-confirmed cases in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, respectively. False-negative eazyplex results were associated with RT-PCR Ct values > 30, and were more frequent in the asymptomatic group than in the symptomatic group (38.1% vs. 5.1%, respectively). Both the Liat and eazyplex assays are suitable for testing symptomatic patients. Their use in screening asymptomatic patients depends on the need to exclude any infection or identify those at high risk of transmission.

摘要

对前往急诊科(ED)的患者进行严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)快速检测,有助于做出患者入院时是否隔离的决策。分子检测方法灵敏度的差异对诊断流程有影响。本研究评估了cobas Liat RT-PCR的性能,该方法在我们医院常规用作ED患者的初始检测,并与eazyplex RT-LAMP进行了比较。共分析了378份Liat检测结果为阳性的口咽和鼻咽拭子。剩余样本等分试样使用NeuMoDx™、cobas RT-PCR和eazyplex检测进行检测。根据世界卫生组织的病例定义,将患者分为无症状组(n = 157)和有症状组(n = 221)。总体而言,14%的Liat阳性结果未被RT-PCR确认。这些样本主要来自26.8%的无症状患者,而有症状组为3.8%。因此,在获得RT-PCR结果之前,Liat阳性结果用于在ED中对患者进行临时隔离。eazyplex检测分别在无症状和有症状患者中识别出62%和90.6%的RT-PCR确诊病例。eazyplex假阴性结果与RT-PCR Ct值> 30相关,且在无症状组中比有症状组更常见(分别为38.1%和5.1%)。Liat检测和eazyplex检测都适用于检测有症状患者。它们在筛查无症状患者中的应用取决于排除任何感染或识别高传播风险人群的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验