Suppr超能文献

在包括即时检测在内的环境中检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2:Cobas严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2核酸检测的性能及与Cobas Liat系统的实用性

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Settings Including Point-of-Care: Performance of the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 NAT and Utility with the Cobas Liat System.

作者信息

Bolanaki Myrto, Möckel Martin, Dodoo Christopher, Gilliam Karen, Robbins Elissa, Hata D Jane, White Bruce

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Acute Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA.

出版信息

Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01186-3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a need to confirm the diagnostic performance of point-of-care (POC) testing for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in emergency departments and time-sensitive outpatient settings. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat System (POC SARS-CoV-2) with the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Qualitative Assay for use on the Cobas 6800/8800 System (68/8800) when used to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection from clinical specimens collected at POC settings.

METHODS

This prospective, two-site, non-interventional study, conducted in the US and Germany, collected fresh POC nasopharyngeal samples according to local procedures for upper respiratory swab sampling. Pairwise agreement was evaluated by estimating positive, negative, and overall percent agreement (PPA, NPA, and OPA, respectively) between POC SARS-CoV-2 and 68/8800 assays. Site-specific analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

Overall, 317 evaluable samples were collected from March 30 to July 2023 (US site) and from November 7, 2023 to April 4, 2024 (German site). Relative to 68/8800, POC SARS-CoV-2 had a PPA of 98.8% (169/171) and an NPA of 90.4% (132/146), while the OPA was 95.0%. Site-specific analyses were broadly comparable to the overall results, although enrichment for positive samples at the US site resulted in a PPA and NPA of 98.6% (139/141) and 55.6% (5/9), respectively.

CONCLUSION

POC SARS-CoV-2 used in both POC and central laboratory settings showed good overall diagnostic performance relative to 68/8800, a widely used and accurate laboratory-based test, for detecting SARS-CoV-2. Efficient POC testing will help improve the timely management of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

摘要

引言

在急诊科和对时间要求较高的门诊环境中,需要确认即时检验(POC)对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的诊断性能。本研究旨在比较用于Cobas Liat系统的Cobas SARS-CoV-2核酸检测(POC SARS-CoV-2)与用于Cobas 6800/8800系统的Cobas SARS-CoV-2定性检测(68/8800)在检测即时检验环境中采集的临床标本中的SARS-CoV-2感染时的诊断性能。

方法

这项在美国和德国进行的前瞻性、双中心、非干预性研究,根据当地上呼吸道拭子采样程序收集新鲜的即时检验鼻咽样本。通过估计POC SARS-CoV-2与68/8800检测之间的阳性、阴性和总体一致性百分比(分别为PPA、NPA和OPA)来评估成对一致性。还进行了特定地点的分析。

结果

总体而言,在2023年3月30日至2023年7月(美国站点)以及2023年11月7日至2024年4月4日(德国站点)期间共收集了317份可评估样本。相对于68/8800,POC SARS-CoV-2的PPA为98.8%(169/171),NPA为90.4%(132/146),而OPA为95.0%。特定地点的分析结果与总体结果大致相当,不过美国站点阳性样本的富集导致PPA和NPA分别为98.6%(139/141)和55.6%(5/9)。

结论

与广泛使用且准确的基于实验室的检测方法68/8800相比,在即时检验和中心实验室环境中使用的POC SARS-CoV-2在检测SARS-CoV-时总体诊断性能良好。高效的即时检验将有助于改善SARS-CoV-2感染的及时管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验