School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 2;23(13):6091. doi: 10.3390/s23136091.
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) have been made possible by advances in sensing and computing technologies. However, the high cost of AVs makes privatization take longer. Therefore, companies with autonomous vehicles can develop shared autonomous vehicle (SAV) projects. AVs with a high level of automation require high upgrade and use costs. In order to meet the needs of more customers and reduce the investment cost of the company, SAVs with different levels of automation may coexist for a long time. Faced with multiple travel modes (autonomous cars with different levels of automation, private cars, and buses), travelers' travel mode choices are worth studying. To further differentiate the types of travelers, this paper defines high-income travelers and low-income travelers. The difference between these two types of travelers is whether they have a private car. The differences in time value and willingness to pay of the two types of travelers are considered. Based on the above considerations, this paper establishes a multi-modal selection model with the goal of maximizing the total utility of all travelers and uses the imperial competition algorithm to solve it. The results show that low-income travelers are more likely to choose buses and autonomous vehicles with lower levels of automation, while high-income travelers tend to choose higher levels of automation due to their high value of travel time.
自动驾驶汽车(AV)的发展得益于传感和计算技术的进步。然而,自动驾驶汽车的高成本使得私有化进程变得更加漫长。因此,拥有自动驾驶汽车的公司可以开发共享自动驾驶汽车(SAV)项目。具有高度自动化水平的自动驾驶汽车需要更高的升级和使用成本。为了满足更多客户的需求并降低公司的投资成本,不同自动化水平的 SAV 可能会长期共存。面对多种出行模式(具有不同自动化水平的自动驾驶汽车、私家车和公交车),值得研究旅行者的出行模式选择。为了进一步区分旅行者的类型,本文定义了高收入旅行者和低收入旅行者。这两种类型的旅行者的区别在于他们是否拥有私家车。考虑了这两种旅行者的时间价值和支付意愿的差异。基于上述考虑,本文建立了一个多模式选择模型,以最大化所有旅行者的总效用,并使用帝国竞争算法进行求解。结果表明,低收入旅行者更有可能选择公交车和自动化程度较低的自动驾驶汽车,而高收入旅行者由于其较高的旅行时间价值,往往更倾向于选择自动化程度较高的汽车。