Rhoden N K
Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Aug;16(4):34-42.
The ethical tensions inherent in all Baby Doe treatment decisions are compounded by medical uncertainty. Physicians both here and abroad have adopted various strategies. Swedish doctors tend to withhold treatment from the beginning from infants for whom statistical data suggest a grim prognosis. The British are more likely to initiate treatment but withdraw it if the infant appears likely to die or suffer severe brain damage. The trend in the U.S. is to start treating any baby who is potentially viable and continue until it is virtually certain that the infant will die. The "least worst" strategy is an individualized one: starting treatment, gathering data, and then reassessing the decision.
医疗不确定性加剧了所有“宝贝 Doe”治疗决策中固有的伦理困境。国内外的医生都采取了各种策略。瑞典医生往往从一开始就不给那些统计数据显示预后不佳的婴儿进行治疗。英国人更倾向于开始治疗,但如果婴儿似乎可能死亡或遭受严重脑损伤,就会停止治疗。美国的趋势是开始治疗任何有存活可能的婴儿,并持续治疗,直到几乎可以确定婴儿将会死亡。“次优”策略是一种个体化策略:开始治疗、收集数据,然后重新评估决策。