Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR), Institut für Optische Sensorsysteme, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Physics and Geology, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 7;23(13):6208. doi: 10.3390/s23136208.
One of the strengths of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is that a large amount of data can be measured relatively easily in a short time, which makes LIBS interesting in many areas, from geomaterial analysis with portable handheld instruments to applications for the exploration of planetary surfaces. Statistical methods, therefore, play an important role in analyzing the data to detect not only individual compositions but also trends and correlations. In this study, we apply two approaches to explore the LIBS data of geomaterials measured with a handheld device at different locations on the Aeolian island of Vulcano, Italy. First, we use the established method, principal component analysis (PCA), and second we adopt the principle of the interesting features finder (IFF), which was recently proposed for the analysis of LIBS imaging data. With this method it is possible to identify spectra that contain emission lines of minor and trace elements that often remain undetected with variance-based methods, such as PCA. We could not detect any spectra with IFF that were not detected with PCA when applying both methods to our LIBS field data. The reason for this may be the nature of our field data, which are subject to more experimental changes than data measured in laboratory settings, such as LIBS imaging data, for which the IFF was introduced first. In conclusion, however, we found that the two approaches complement each other well, making the exploration of the data more intuitive, straightforward, and efficient.
激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)的一个优势是可以在短时间内相对容易地测量大量数据,这使得 LIBS 在许多领域都很有趣,从使用便携式手持仪器的地质材料分析到行星表面探测的应用。因此,统计方法在分析数据以检测不仅单个成分,而且趋势和相关性方面发挥着重要作用。在这项研究中,我们应用两种方法来探索在意大利埃奥利群岛的武尔卡诺岛不同位置用手持式设备测量的地质材料的 LIBS 数据。首先,我们使用已建立的方法,主成分分析(PCA),其次我们采用最近提出的有趣特征查找器(IFF)的原理,该原理用于分析 LIBS 成像数据。使用这种方法,可以识别出通常用基于方差的方法(如 PCA)检测不到的微量元素和痕量元素的发射线。当将这两种方法应用于我们的 LIBS 现场数据时,我们无法检测到 IFF 检测到的任何与 PCA 未检测到的光谱。原因可能是我们现场数据的性质,与实验室环境下测量的 LIBS 成像数据等数据相比,现场数据更容易受到更多实验变化的影响,IFF 首先就是针对这些数据提出的。然而,总的来说,我们发现这两种方法可以很好地互补,使数据的探索更加直观、直接和高效。