Suppr超能文献

心脏手术准备:一项横断面研究,旨在确定门诊患者对以患者为中心的护理的看法和体验之间的差距。

Preparation for cardiac procedures: a cross-sectional study identifying gaps between outpatients' views and experiences of patient-centred care.

机构信息

Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024 May 22;10(3):235-245. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad042.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To examine and identify gaps in care perceived as essential by patients; this study examined outpatients': (1) views on what characterizes essential care and (2) experiences of care received, in relation to cardiac catheterization and subsequent cardiovascular procedures.

METHODS

Cross-sectional descriptive study. Surveys were posted to outpatients who had undergone elective cardiac catheterization in the prior 6 months at an Australian hospital. Participants completed a 65-item survey to determine: (a) aspects of care they perceive as essential to patients receiving care for a cardiac condition (Important Care Survey); or (b) their actual care received (Actual Care Survey). Numbers and percentages were used to calculate the most frequently identified essential care items; and the experiences of care received. Items rated as either 'Essential'/'Very important' by at least 80% of participants were determined. A gap in patient-centred care was identified as being any item that was endorsed as essential/very important by 80% or more of participants but reported as received by <80% of participants.

RESULTS

Of 582 eligible patients, 264 (45%) returned a completed survey. A total of 43/65 items were endorsed by >80% of participants as essential. Of those, for 22 items, <80% reported the care as received. Gaps were identified in relation to general practitionerconsultation (1 item), preparation (1 item) subsequent decision making for treatment (1 item), prognosis (6 items), and post-treatment follow-up (1 item).

CONCLUSIONS

Areas were identified where actual care fell short of patients' perceptions of essential care.

摘要

背景

为了检查和确定患者认为至关重要的护理差距;本研究检查了门诊患者:(1)对哪些特征是基本护理的看法;(2)与心脏导管检查和随后的心血管程序相关的护理体验。

方法

横断面描述性研究。调查问卷被邮寄给在澳大利亚医院接受择期心脏导管检查的门诊患者。参与者完成了一份 65 项的调查问卷,以确定:(a)他们认为接受心脏疾病护理的患者的护理方面至关重要的内容(重要护理调查);或(b)他们实际接受的护理(实际护理调查)。使用数字和百分比来计算最常被确定为基本护理项目的内容;以及护理体验。至少 80%的参与者将项目评为“必需的”/“非常重要的”。将至少 80%的患者认为重要的项目确定为以患者为中心的护理差距。

结果

在 582 名符合条件的患者中,有 264 名(45%)返回了一份完整的调查问卷。共有 43/65 项被 80%以上的参与者认为是必需的。其中,对于 22 项,<80%的人报告了所接受的护理。在全科医生咨询(1 项)、准备(1 项)、随后的治疗决策(1 项)、预后(6 项)和治疗后随访(1 项)方面都发现了差距。

结论

确定了实际护理与患者对基本护理的看法之间存在差距的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7703/11112521/fa61dd040402/qcad042fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验