Schartz Derrek, Manganaro Mark, Szekeres Denes, Ismail Rahim, Hoang Timothy, Worley Logan, Finkelstein Alan, Schartz Chelsey, Akkipeddi Sajal Medha K, Bender Matthew T, Kessler Alex
Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Jul 16:15910199231188859. doi: 10.1177/15910199231188859.
Embolization of head and neck paragangliomas (HNPs) is a well-established treatment strategy and adjunctive therapy. However, the optimal mode of intervention, whether by direct percutaneous puncture (DP) or via transarterial embolization (TAE), remains unclear.
The aim of this study was to complete a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of DP versus TAE for HNP embolization. The Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases were used to identify studies describing the clinical outcomes of either DP or TAE for HNP embolization. Outcome measures included: complete angiographic devascularization, major complications, and minor complications. Pooled rates were calculated for each variable which were then compared with meta-regression using a random effects model.
Thirty-one retrospective studies met inclusion criteria, detailing 394 patients with 411 HNPs. Overall, DP was associated with a higher rate of complete devascularization (91.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.6% to 97.4%; = 0%) when compared to TAE technique (40.1%, CI: 27.2% to 58.9%; = 93%). However, there was no difference regarding major complication rates between DP (6%, CI:1.3% to 10.8%; = 0%) and TAE for HNP embolization (3.3%, CI: 1.4% to 5.3%; = 0%) (p = 0.370), nor in minor complications between the techniques (p = 0.211). Subgroup analysis of TAE embolic agents revealed that particle embolics were associated with a significantly lower rate of major complications (2.5%; 0.4% to 4.6%; = 0%) when compared to liquid embolics (10.6%, CI:4% to 17.3%; = 48%; p = 0.022).
A DP approach for HNP embolization results in a higher rate of complete devascularization and with a similar complication profile when compared to TAE. These findings also suggest that particle embolics are associated with fewer major complications compared to liquid embolics when TAE is utilized.
头颈部副神经节瘤(HNP)的栓塞治疗是一种成熟的治疗策略和辅助治疗方法。然而,最佳干预方式,无论是直接经皮穿刺(DP)还是经动脉栓塞(TAE),仍不明确。
本研究的目的是完成一项系统的文献综述和荟萃分析,以比较DP与TAE用于HNP栓塞的安全性和有效性。使用Cochrane图书馆和MEDLINE数据库来识别描述DP或TAE用于HNP栓塞临床结果的研究。结果指标包括:血管造影完全去血管化、主要并发症和次要并发症。计算每个变量的合并率,然后使用随机效应模型与荟萃回归进行比较。
31项回顾性研究符合纳入标准,详细描述了394例患者的411个HNP。总体而言,与TAE技术(40.1%,置信区间[CI]:27.2%至58.9%;P = 93%)相比,DP导致完全去血管化的比例更高(91.5%,95%CI:85.6%至97.4%;P = 0%)。然而,DP(6%,CI:1.3%至10.8%;P = 0%)与TAE用于HNP栓塞(3.3%,CI:1.4%至5.3%;P = 0%)的主要并发症发生率没有差异(P = 0.370),两种技术在次要并发症方面也没有差异(P = 0.211)。TAE栓塞剂的亚组分析显示,与液体栓塞剂(10.6%,CI:4%至17.3%;P = 48%;P = 0.022)相比,颗粒栓塞剂的主要并发症发生率显著更低(2.5%;0.4%至4.6%;P = 0%)。
与TAE相比,DP用于HNP栓塞可导致更高的完全去血管化率,且并发症情况相似。这些发现还表明,当使用TAE时,颗粒栓塞剂与液体栓塞剂相比,主要并发症更少。