• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能和大数据技术在构建冠状动脉旁路移植术患者手术风险预测模型中的应用。

Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Technologies in the Construction of Surgical Risk Prediction Model for Patients with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

机构信息

Radiology Department, the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213164, Jiangsu, China.

Cardio Thoracic Department, the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213164, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Comput Intell Neurosci. 2023 Jul 7;2023:9575553. doi: 10.1155/2023/9575553. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1155/2023/9575553
PMID:37455771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10348861/
Abstract

The objective of this work was to predict the risk of mortality rate in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) based on the risk prediction model of CABG using artificial intelligence (AI) and big data technologies. The clinical data of 2,364 patients undergoing CABG in our hospital from January 2019 to August 2021 were collected in this work. Based on AI and big data technology, business requirement analysis, system requirement analysis, complication prediction module, big data mining technology, and model building are carried out, respectively; the successful CABG risk prediction system includes case feature analysis service, risk warning service, and case retrieval service. The commonly used precision, recall, and F1-score were adopted to evaluate the quality of the gradient-boosted tree (GBT) model. The analysis proved that the GBT model was the best in terms of precision, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). According to the CABG risk prediction model, 1,382 patients had a score of <0, 463 patients had a score of 0 ≤ score ≤ 2, 252 patients had a score of 2 < score ≤ 5, and 267 patients had a score of >5, which were stratified into four groups: A, B, C, and D. The actual number of in-hospital deaths was 25, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.05%. The mortality rate predicted by the CABG risk prediction model was 2.67 ± 1.82% (95% confidential interval (CI) (2.87-2.98)), which was higher than the actual value. The CABG risk prediction model showed the credible results only in group B with AUC = 0.763 > 0.7. In group B, 3 patients actually died, the actual mortality rate was 0.33%, and the predicted mortality rate was 0.96 ± 0.78 (95% CI (0.82-0.87)), which overestimated the mortality rate of patients in group B. It successfully constructed a CABG risk prediction model based on the AI and big data technologies, which would overestimate the mortality of patients with intermediate risk, and it is suitable for different types of heart diseases through continuous research and development and innovation, and provides clinical guidance value.

摘要

本工作旨在基于人工智能(AI)和大数据技术的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)风险预测模型,预测 CABG 患者的死亡率风险。收集了我院 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 8 月 2364 例行 CABG 患者的临床资料。基于 AI 和大数据技术,分别进行业务需求分析、系统需求分析、并发症预测模块、大数据挖掘技术和模型构建;成功构建的 CABG 风险预测系统包括病例特征分析服务、风险预警服务和病例检索服务。常用的精度、召回率和 F1 评分用于评估梯度提升树(GBT)模型的质量。分析表明,GBT 模型在精度、F1 评分和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积方面表现最佳。根据 CABG 风险预测模型,1382 例患者的评分<0,463 例患者的评分 0≤评分≤2,252 例患者的评分 2<评分≤5,267 例患者的评分>5,将患者分为 4 个组:A、B、C 和 D。住院期间实际死亡人数为 25 例,住院死亡率为 1.05%。CABG 风险预测模型预测的死亡率为 2.67±1.82%(95%置信区间(CI)(2.87-2.98)),高于实际值。CABG 风险预测模型仅在 AUC=0.763>0.7 的 B 组中显示出可靠的结果。在 B 组中,实际死亡的患者为 3 例,实际死亡率为 0.33%,预测死亡率为 0.96±0.78(95%CI(0.82-0.87)),高估了 B 组患者的死亡率。成功构建了基于 AI 和大数据技术的 CABG 风险预测模型,该模型会高估中危患者的死亡率,通过不断的研究和开发创新,适用于不同类型的心脏病,为临床提供指导价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/17ebed3a1be4/CIN2023-9575553.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/cfb57c9fea0f/CIN2023-9575553.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/fa09bf5ca0ba/CIN2023-9575553.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/039501fa1e72/CIN2023-9575553.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/5ee1cb0e127d/CIN2023-9575553.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/82716af5014e/CIN2023-9575553.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/4754f4aafc2b/CIN2023-9575553.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/53a64262c4a3/CIN2023-9575553.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/d598f945f579/CIN2023-9575553.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/af0460f63ca1/CIN2023-9575553.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/17ebed3a1be4/CIN2023-9575553.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/cfb57c9fea0f/CIN2023-9575553.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/fa09bf5ca0ba/CIN2023-9575553.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/039501fa1e72/CIN2023-9575553.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/5ee1cb0e127d/CIN2023-9575553.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/82716af5014e/CIN2023-9575553.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/4754f4aafc2b/CIN2023-9575553.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/53a64262c4a3/CIN2023-9575553.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/d598f945f579/CIN2023-9575553.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/af0460f63ca1/CIN2023-9575553.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10348861/17ebed3a1be4/CIN2023-9575553.010.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Technologies in the Construction of Surgical Risk Prediction Model for Patients with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.人工智能和大数据技术在构建冠状动脉旁路移植术患者手术风险预测模型中的应用。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2023 Jul 7;2023:9575553. doi: 10.1155/2023/9575553. eCollection 2023.
2
Does CHADS-VASc Score Predict MACE in Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery?CHADS-VASc评分能否预测接受单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的主要不良心血管事件?
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Dec 1;34(5):542-549. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0323.
3
Validation of four different risk stratification systems in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a UK multicentre analysis of 2223 patients.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术患者中四种不同风险分层系统的验证:英国对2223例患者的多中心分析
Heart. 2003 Apr;89(4):432-5. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.4.432.
4
Performance of EuroSCORE II and SinoSCORE in Chinese patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和中国心脏手术风险评估系统(SinoSCORE)在中国接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中的表现。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Nov;23(5):733-739. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw224. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Prediction of coronary artery bypass graft outcomes using a single surgical note: An artificial intelligence-based prediction model study.使用单一手术记录预测冠状动脉搭桥术结果:一项基于人工智能的预测模型研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 25;19(4):e0300796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300796. eCollection 2024.
6
The Asian system for cardiac operative risk evaluation for predicting mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (ASCORE-C).用于预测单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术后死亡率的亚洲心脏手术风险评估系统(ASCORE-C)。
J Card Surg. 2020 Oct;35(10):2574-2582. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14836. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
7
Performance of the AusSCORE II and STS Score for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a New Zealand Population.新西兰人群中冠状动脉旁路移植术的AusSCORE II和STS评分表现
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Apr;30(4):600-604. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
8
Complexity of coronary artery disease affects outcome of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with impaired left ventricular function.冠心病的复杂性影响左心室功能障碍患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术的预后。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Sep;146(3):656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.058. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
[Change of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and big endothelin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting].[冠状动脉搭桥术患者N末端脑钠肽前体和大内皮素的变化]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2007 Nov;19(11):667-70.
10
Performance of EuroSCORE II in a large US database: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)在美国大型数据库中的表现:对经导管主动脉瓣植入术的影响
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Sep;46(3):400-8; discussion 408. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu033. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Providing Real-Time Guidance During Interventional Cardiology Procedures: A Narrative Review.人工智能在介入心脏病学手术中提供实时指导的作用:一项叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2025 May 4;17(5):e83464. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83464. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Interventions: Preprocedural Planning and Procedural Assistance.冠状动脉介入治疗中的人工智能:术前规划与术中辅助
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Mar 18;4(3Part B):102519. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102519. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Current Applications and Future Perspectives of Artificial and Biomimetic Intelligence in Vascular Surgery and Peripheral Artery Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Anomaly Detection for the Centralised Elasticsearch Service at CERN.欧洲核子研究组织集中式Elasticsearch服务的异常检测
Front Big Data. 2021 Nov 16;4:718879. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.718879. eCollection 2021.
2
A Simple Risk Scoring System for Predicting the Occurrence of Aspiration Pneumonia After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.一种用于预测胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后发生吸入性肺炎的简单风险评分系统。
Anesth Analg. 2022 Jan 1;134(1):114-122. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005779.
3
Establishment of risk prediction model of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: 2016 edition of definition and grading system of pancreatic fistula: a single center experience with 223 cases.
人工智能与仿生智能在血管外科和外周动脉疾病中的当前应用及未来展望
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Aug 1;9(8):465. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9080465.
胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘风险预测模型的建立:2016 年版胰瘘定义和分级系统:单中心 223 例经验。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug 30;19(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02372-6.
4
Machine Learning for Predicting the 3-Year Risk of Incident Diabetes in Chinese Adults.用于预测中国成年人新发糖尿病3年风险的机器学习
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;9:626331. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.626331. eCollection 2021.
5
A risk scoring system to predict the risk of new-onset hypertension among patients with type 2 diabetes.用于预测 2 型糖尿病患者新发高血压风险的风险评分系统。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 Aug;23(8):1570-1580. doi: 10.1111/jch.14322. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
6
New Scoring System for Predicting the Risk of Surgical Site Infections Following Stoma Reversal.用于预测造口回纳术后手术部位感染风险的新评分系统。
J Surg Res. 2021 Nov;267:350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.041. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
7
Predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery using a simplified risk index.使用简化风险指数预测心脏手术后的心房颤动。
J Electrocardiol. 2021 Jul-Aug;67:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
8
Repeat Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis of Off-Pump versus On-Pump Techniques in a Large Cohort of Patients.再次冠状动脉旁路移植术:大样本队列中不停跳与传统冠状动脉旁路移植术的荟萃分析。
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Sep;30(9):1281-1291. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.02.015. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
9
A Clinically Applicable Prediction Model for the Risk of Transfusion in Women Undergoing Myomectomy.用于预测行子宫肌瘤剔除术的女性输血风险的临床适用预测模型。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Oct;28(10):1765-1773.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
10
In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, is endoscopic harvesting superior to open radial artery harvesting?在接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者中,内镜采集是否优于开放式桡动脉采集?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr 8;32(3):447-451. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa291.