Suppr超能文献

改善慢性疼痛服用阿片类药物患者的医疗服务可及性:密歇根州一个改良德尔菲小组的建议

Improving Access to Care for Patients Taking Opioids for Chronic Pain: Recommendations from a Modified Delphi Panel in Michigan.

作者信息

Kehne Adrianne, Bernstein Steven J, Thomas Jennifer, Bicket Mark C, Bohnert Amy S B, Madden Erin Fanning, Powell Victoria D, Lagisetty Pooja

机构信息

Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2023 Jul 10;16:2321-2330. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S406034. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

About 5-8 million US patients take long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain. In the context of policies and guidelines instituted to reduce inappropriate opioid prescribing, abrupt discontinuations in opioid prescriptions have increased and many primary care clinics will not prescribe opioids for new patients, reducing access to care. This may result in uncontrolled pain and other negative outcomes, such as transition to illicit opioids. The objective of this study was to generate policy, intervention, and research recommendations to improve access to care for these patients.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

We conducted a RAND/UCLA Modified Delphi, consisting of workshops, background videos and reading materials, and moderated web-based panel discussions held September 2020-January 2021. The panel consisted of 24 individuals from across Michigan, identified via expert nomination and snowball recruitment, including clinical providers, health science researchers, state-level policymakers and regulators, care coordination experts, patient advocates, payor representatives, and community and public health experts. The panel proposed intervention, policy, and research recommendations, scored the feasibility, impact, and importance of each on a 9-point scale, and ranked all recommendations by implementation priority.

RESULTS

The panel produced 11 final recommendations across three themes: reimbursement reform, provider education, and reducing racial inequities in care. The 3 reimbursement-focused recommendations were highest ranked (theme average = 4.2/11), including the two top-ranked recommendations: increasing reimbursement for time needed to treat complex chronic pain (ranked #1/11) and bundling payment for multimodal pain care (#2/11). Four provider education recommendations ranked slightly lower (theme average = 6.2/11) and included clarifying the spectrum of opioid dependence and training providers on multimodal treatments. Four recommendations addressed racial inequities (theme average = 7.2/11), such as standardizing pain management protocols to reduce treatment disparities.

CONCLUSION

Panelists indicated reimbursement should incentivize traditionally lower-paying evidence-based pain care, but multiple strategies may be needed to meaningfully expand access.

摘要

目的

约500 - 800万美国患者接受长期阿片类药物治疗以缓解慢性疼痛。在为减少不适当阿片类药物处方而制定的政策和指南背景下,阿片类药物处方的突然中断有所增加,许多初级保健诊所不再为新患者开具阿片类药物,从而减少了医疗服务的可及性。这可能导致疼痛无法控制以及其他负面后果,比如转向使用非法阿片类药物。本研究的目的是提出政策、干预措施和研究建议,以改善这些患者获得医疗服务的机会。

参与者与方法

我们开展了一项兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校改良德尔菲法研究,包括研讨会、背景视频和阅读材料,以及于2020年9月至2021年1月举行的基于网络的小组讨论并由主持人引导。该小组由来自密歇根州各地的24人组成,通过专家提名和滚雪球式招募确定,包括临床提供者、健康科学研究人员、州级政策制定者和监管者、护理协调专家、患者权益倡导者、付款方代表以及社区和公共卫生专家。该小组提出了干预措施、政策和研究建议,对每项建议的可行性、影响和重要性进行了9分制评分,并按实施优先级对所有建议进行了排序。

结果

该小组围绕三个主题提出了11项最终建议:报销改革、提供者教育以及减少医疗中的种族不平等。以报销为重点的3项建议排名最高(主题平均排名 = 4.2/11),包括排名前两位的建议:增加对治疗复杂慢性疼痛所需时间的报销(排名第1/11)以及对多模式疼痛护理进行捆绑支付(排名第2/11)。4项提供者教育建议排名略低(主题平均排名 = 6.2/11),包括明确阿片类药物依赖的范围以及对提供者进行多模式治疗培训。4项建议涉及种族不平等问题(主题平均排名 = 7.2/11),例如规范疼痛管理方案以减少治疗差异。

结论

小组成员表示,报销应激励传统上支付较低的循证疼痛护理,但可能需要多种策略才能切实扩大医疗服务的可及性。

相似文献

3
5
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Eight Priorities for Improving Primary Care Access Management in Healthcare Organizations: Results of a Modified Delphi Stakeholder Panel.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Feb;35(2):523-530. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05541-2. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
9
Access to Primary Care Clinics for Patients With Chronic Pain Receiving Opioids.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6928.

引用本文的文献

1
A Longitudinal Multivariable Analysis: State Policies and Opioid Dispensing in Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Surgery.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(15):2942-2951. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08888-3. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2022 Nov 4;71(3):1-95. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1.
4
5
Integrating DATA 2000 waiver training into undergraduate medical education: The time is now.
Subst Abus. 2021;42(2):236-243. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1903653. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
6
Implicit bias in healthcare: clinical practice, research and decision making.
Future Healthc J. 2021 Mar;8(1):40-48. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0233.
7
Assessing reasons for decreased primary care access for individuals on prescribed opioids: an audit study.
Pain. 2021 May 1;162(5):1379-1386. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002145.
8
Nonconsensual Dose Reduction Mandates are Not Justified Clinically or Ethically: An Analysis.
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Jun;48(2):259-267. doi: 10.1177/1073110520935337.
9
Access to Multimodal Pain Management for Patients with Chronic Pain: an Audit Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):818-820. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05866-3. Epub 2020 May 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验