Pinto-Bustamante Boris Julián, Riaño-Moreno Julián C, Clavijo-Montoya Hernando Augusto, Cárdenas-Galindo María Alejandra, Campos-Figueredo Wilson David
Bioethics Department, Bioethics, Life Sciences Research Group, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Medical and Health Sciences Education Research Group, Bogotá, Colombia.
Front Robot AI. 2023 Jun 19;10:1140901. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1140901. eCollection 2023.
The present work revisits how artificial intelligence, as technology and ideology, is based on the rational choice theory and the techno-liberal discourse, supported by large corporations and investment funds. Those that promote using different algorithmic processes (such as filter bubbles or echo chambers) create homogeneous and polarized spaces that reinforces people's ethical, ideological, and political narratives. These mechanisms validate bubbles of choices as statements of fact and contravene the prerequisites for exercising deliberation in pluralistic societies, such as the distinction between data and values, the affirmation of reasonable dissent, and the relevance of diversity as a condition indispensable for democratic deliberation.
本研究重新审视了人工智能作为一种技术和意识形态,是如何基于理性选择理论和技术自由主义话语,并得到大公司和投资基金支持的。那些推动使用不同算法过程(如过滤气泡或回音室)的人创造了同质化和两极分化的空间,强化了人们的伦理、意识形态和政治叙事。这些机制将选择的气泡视为事实陈述,违背了多元社会中进行审议的前提条件,比如数据与价值观的区分、对合理异议的肯定,以及多样性作为民主审议不可或缺条件的相关性。
Front Robot AI. 2023-6-19
Philos Technol. 2022
Med Health Care Philos. 2004
Bioethics. 2018-2
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015-7
Med Health Care Philos. 2009-11
J Environ Public Health. 2022
Nature. 2023-5
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021-3-2
Lancet Digit Health. 2020-10
Nature. 2020-5-13
Sci Rep. 2020-1-15
Sci Rep. 2019-12-27