• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 回音室:考察保守派和自由派新闻来源对风险认知和应对的影响。

COVID-19 Echo Chambers: Examining the Impact of Conservative and Liberal News Sources on Risk Perception and Response.

机构信息

Kenneth A. Lachlan, PhD, is a Professor and Department Head; and Emily Hutter, MA, and Christine Gilbert, MA, are Graduate Assistants; all in the Department of Communication, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.

出版信息

Health Secur. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):21-30. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0176. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1089/hs.2020.0176
PMID:33470883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9195485/
Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created substantial challenges for public health officials who must communicate pandemic-related risks and recommendations to the public. Their efforts have been further hampered by the politicization of the pandemic, including media outlets that question the seriousness and necessity of protective actions. The availability of highly politicized news from online platforms has led to concerns about the notion of "echo chambers," whereby users are exposed only to information that conforms to and reinforces their existing beliefs. Using a sample of 5,000 US residents, we explored their information-seeking tendencies, reliance on conservative and liberal online media, risk perceptions, and mitigation behaviors. The results of our study suggest that risk perceptions may vary across preferences for conservative or liberal bias; however, our results do not support differences in the mitigation behavior across patterns of media use. Further, our findings do not support the notion of echo chambers, but rather suggest that people with lower information-seeking behavior may be more strongly influenced by politicized COVID-19 news. Risk estimates converge at higher levels of information seeking, suggesting that high information seekers consume news from sources across the political spectrum. These results are discussed in terms of their theoretical implications for the study of online echo chambers and their practical implications for public health officials and emergency managers.

摘要

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给公共卫生官员带来了巨大挑战,他们必须向公众传达与大流行相关的风险和建议。大流行的政治化,包括质疑保护措施的严肃性和必要性的媒体,使他们的努力进一步受到阻碍。在线平台上提供的高度政治化的新闻引发了人们对“回音室”概念的担忧,即用户只接触到符合并强化其现有信念的信息。我们使用了 5000 名美国居民的样本,探讨了他们的信息搜索倾向、对保守派和自由派在线媒体的依赖、风险认知以及缓解行为。我们的研究结果表明,风险认知可能因对保守派或自由派偏见的偏好而有所不同;然而,我们的结果并不支持在媒体使用模式上存在缓解行为的差异。此外,我们的研究结果不支持回音室的概念,而是表明信息搜索行为较少的人可能更容易受到政治化的 COVID-19 新闻的影响。风险估计在较高的信息搜索水平上趋于一致,这表明高信息搜索者会从政治光谱的各个来源获取新闻。这些结果从在线回音室研究的理论意义和公共卫生官员和应急管理人员的实际意义方面进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3733/9195485/0dc0bdb9483f/hs.2020.0176_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3733/9195485/1d3011b7791a/hs.2020.0176_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3733/9195485/defaf7bc393d/hs.2020.0176_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3733/9195485/0dc0bdb9483f/hs.2020.0176_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3733/9195485/1d3011b7791a/hs.2020.0176_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3733/9195485/defaf7bc393d/hs.2020.0176_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3733/9195485/0dc0bdb9483f/hs.2020.0176_figure3.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 Echo Chambers: Examining the Impact of Conservative and Liberal News Sources on Risk Perception and Response.COVID-19 回音室:考察保守派和自由派新闻来源对风险认知和应对的影响。
Health Secur. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):21-30. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0176. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Investigating and Improving the Accuracy of US Citizens' Beliefs About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study.调查和提高美国公民对新冠疫情的认知准确性:纵向调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 12;23(1):e24069. doi: 10.2196/24069.
3
Media trust and infection mitigating behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的媒体信任与感染缓解行为。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003323.
4
Institutional and non-institutional news trust as predictors of COVID-19 beliefs: Evidence from three European countries.制度性和非制度性新闻信任对 COVID-19 信仰的预测作用:来自三个欧洲国家的证据。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 May;33(4):430-446. doi: 10.1177/09636625231217081. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
5
Understanding the Impact of Communicating Uncertainty About COVID-19 in the News: Randomized Between-Subjects Factorial Experiment.理解新闻中传播 COVID-19 不确定性的影响:随机分组因子实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 14;26:e51910. doi: 10.2196/51910.
6
Patterns of Media Use, Strength of Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories, and the Prevention of COVID-19 From March to July 2020 in the United States: Survey Study.2020 年 3 月至 7 月期间美国的媒体使用模式、对新冠病毒阴谋论的信念强度与新冠病毒的预防:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 27;23(4):e25215. doi: 10.2196/25215.
7
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.
8
Health Information Seeking Behaviors on Social Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among American Social Networking Site Users: Survey Study.新冠疫情期间美国社交网站用户在社交媒体上的健康信息搜索行为:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 11;23(6):e29802. doi: 10.2196/29802.
9
COVID-19 related messaging, beliefs, information sources, and mitigation behaviors in Virginia: a cross-sectional survey in the summer of 2020.2020 年夏季弗吉尼亚州 COVID-19 相关信息、信念、信息来源和缓解行为的横断面调查。
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 8;12:e16714. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16714. eCollection 2024.
10
Longitudinal Evidence of How Media Audiences Differ in Public Health Perceptions and Behaviors During a Global Pandemic.在全球大流行期间,媒体受众在公共卫生认知和行为方面的差异的纵向证据。
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 2;8:583408. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.583408. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioethics and artificial intelligence: between deliberation on values and rational choice theory.生物伦理学与人工智能:在价值审议与理性选择理论之间
Front Robot AI. 2023 Jun 19;10:1140901. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1140901. eCollection 2023.
2
Conservative Media Use and COVID-19 Related Behavior: The Moderating Role of Media Literacy Variables.保守媒体使用与 COVID-19 相关行为:媒体素养变量的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;19(13):7572. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137572.
3
Infodemic and fake news - A comprehensive overview of its global magnitude during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021: A scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage.新冠疫情新闻报道中的政治化与两极分化。
Sci Commun. 2020 Oct;42(5):679-697. doi: 10.1177/1075547020950735.
2
Twitter message types, health beliefs, and vaccine attitudes during the 2015 measles outbreak in California.2015 年加利福尼亚麻疹爆发期间的推特消息类型、健康信念和疫苗态度。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Nov;47(11):1314-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
3
Addressing Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media.应对社交媒体上与健康相关的错误信息。
信息疫情与虚假新闻——2021年新冠疫情期间其全球影响的全面概述:一项范围综述
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Aug;78:103144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103144. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
4
Risk Perception towards COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis.对 COVID-19 的风险感知:系统评价和定性综合。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4649. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084649.
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2417-2418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16865.
4
Political orientation, political environment, and health behaviors in the United States.美国的政治倾向、政治环境与健康行为。
Prev Med. 2018 Sep;114:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
5
Neighborhood political composition and personal belief exemptions from immunization requirements in California Kindergartens, 2000-2015.2000-2015 年加利福尼亚幼儿园的邻里政治构成和个人信仰免疫豁免情况。
Vaccine. 2018 Jul 5;36(29):4298-4303. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.108. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
6
State-Level Voting Patterns and Adolescent Vaccination Coverage in the United States, 2014.2014年美国各州投票模式与青少年疫苗接种覆盖率
Am J Public Health. 2016 Oct;106(10):1879-81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303381. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
7
Beliefs about Childhood Vaccination in the United States: Political Ideology, False Consensus, and the Illusion of Uniqueness.美国关于儿童疫苗接种的观念:政治意识形态、错误共识与独特性幻觉
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158382. eCollection 2016.
8
Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: a systematic review.与接种大流行性流感疫苗有关的因素:系统评价。
Vaccine. 2011 Sep 2;29(38):6472-84. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.107. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
9
Determinants of adults' intention to vaccinate against pandemic swine flu.成年人接种大流行流感疫苗意愿的决定因素。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 6;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-15.
10
Communicating risks: examining hazard and outrage in multiple contexts.沟通风险:在多个背景下考察危险和愤怒。
Risk Anal. 2010 Dec;30(12):1872-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01511.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.