A retrospective comparison of the emergent use of fixed-dose four-factor prothrombin complex versus weight-based dosing for intracranial hemorrhage assessing medication delivery time and cost.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate a low fixed-dose versus weight-based dosing strategy for four-factor prothrombin complex (4F-PCC) time to administration in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted at a single rural Tertiary referral center in patients ≥18 years old on warfarin with ICH who received 4F-PCC. Continuous variables were summarized using mean (±95% CI) and compared using two-tailed tests; values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 46 ICH patients were reversed using 4F-PCC (Fixed, n = 27 and Weight, n = 19). Baseline characteristics were equivalent. Total units of 4F-PCC (mean dose units 2525.1 versus 1623.3) and dose per kg were significantly reduced in the fixed-dose group. Total time from order to delivery was significantly reduced with the fixed-dose strategy (mean time 43.0 versus 29.0 minutes). Hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, and mortality were equivalent with a similar mechanism. International Normalized Ratio (INR) reversal success (≤1.5) and total INR change was comparable with no difference in adverse thromboses between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A fixed-dosed strategy reduced time to 4F-PCC administration for warfarin reversal in ICH, as compared to a weight-based strategy; with no increase in LOS, mortality, or need for additional dosing. This also resulted in significant cost savings.