Fuchita Mikita, Pattee Jack, Russell Derek W, Driver Brian E, Prekker Matthew E, Barnes Christopher R, Brewer Joseph M, Doerschug Kevin C, Gaillard John P, Gandotra Sheetal, Ghamande Shekhar, Gibbs Kevin W, Hughes Christopher G, Janz David R, Khan Akram, Mitchell Steven H, Page David B, Rice Todd W, Self Wesley H, Smith Lane M, Stempek Susan B, Trent Stacy A, Vonderhaar Derek J, West Jason R, Whitson Micah R, Williamson Kayla, Semler Matthew W, Casey Jonathan D, Ginde Adit A
Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Department of Biostatistics & Informatics, Center for Innovative Design & Analysis, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO.
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Jul 12;5(7):e0946. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000946. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Hypotension affects approximately 40% of critically ill patients undergoing emergency intubation and is associated with an increased risk of death. The objective of this study was to examine the association between prophylactic vasopressor administration and the incidence of peri-intubation hypotension and other clinical outcomes.
A secondary analysis of two multicenter randomized clinical trials. The clinical effect of prophylactic vasopressor administration was estimated using a one-to-one propensity-matched cohort of patients with and without prophylactic vasopressors.
Seven emergency departments and 17 ICUs across the United States.
One thousand seven hundred ninety-eight critically ill patients who underwent emergency intubation at the study sites between February 1, 2019, and May 24, 2021.
None.
The primary outcome was peri-intubation hypotension defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg occurring between induction and 2 minutes after tracheal intubation. A total of 187 patients (10%) received prophylactic vasopressors prior to intubation. Compared with patients who did not receive prophylactic vasopressors, those who did were older, had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, were more likely to have a diagnosis of sepsis, had lower pre-induction systolic blood pressures, and were more likely to be on continuous vasopressor infusions prior to intubation. In our propensity-matched cohort, prophylactic vasopressor administration was not associated with reduced risk of peri-intubation hypotension (41% vs 32%; = 0.08) or change in systolic blood pressure from baseline (-12 vs -11 mm Hg; = 0.66).
The administration of prophylactic vasopressors was not associated with a lower incidence of peri-intubation hypotension in our propensity-matched analysis. To address potential residual confounding, randomized clinical trials should examine the effect of prophylactic vasopressor administration on peri-intubation outcomes.
低血压影响约40%接受紧急插管的重症患者,并与死亡风险增加相关。本研究的目的是探讨预防性使用血管升压药与插管期间低血压发生率及其他临床结局之间的关联。
对两项多中心随机临床试验进行二次分析。使用一对一倾向匹配队列对接受和未接受预防性血管升压药的患者估计预防性使用血管升压药的临床效果。
美国的7个急诊科和17个重症监护病房。
2019年2月1日至2021年5月24日期间在研究地点接受紧急插管的1798例重症患者。
无。
主要结局是插管期间低血压,定义为诱导期至气管插管后2分钟内收缩压低于90 mmHg。共有187例患者(10%)在插管前接受了预防性血管升压药。与未接受预防性血管升压药的患者相比,接受者年龄更大,急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II更高,更有可能诊断为脓毒症,诱导前收缩压更低,插管前更有可能接受持续血管升压药输注。在我们的倾向匹配队列中,预防性使用血管升压药与降低插管期间低血压风险无关(41%对32%;P = 0.08),也与收缩压相对于基线的变化无关(-12对-11 mmHg;P = 0.66)。
在我们的倾向匹配分析中,预防性使用血管升压药与降低插管期间低血压发生率无关。为解决潜在的残余混杂因素,随机临床试验应研究预防性使用血管升压药对插管期间结局的影响。