• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants.

作者信息

Brown L D

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):231-54. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-231.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-11-2-231
PMID:3745838
Abstract

Beginning in 1982 the Reagan administration tried to impose federal regulations (based on the civil rights approach of Section 504) on the medical treatment of handicapped newborns in the nation's hospitals. After issuing three sets of regulations, the administration found itself rebuffed by the courts and in ill repute with providers and parts of the public, especially after its widely publicized intervention in the case of Baby Jane Doe illustrated the pitfalls of federal regulation in complex medical decisions. Congress, however, soon enacted legislation employing different means to protect handicapped newborns. The episode offers insights into the dynamics of the U.S. system of separated powers, the limitations of the "civil rights" approach, and the importance of negotiating structures for the resolution of private moral dilemmas with public implications.

摘要

相似文献

1
Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):231-54. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-231.
2
The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe.反堕胎运动与无名女婴简
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):255-69. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-255.
3
Survival at what cost? Origins and effects of the modern controversy on treating severely handicapped newborns.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):199-213. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-199.
4
Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):215-30. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-215.
5
Checkmating the Baby Doe regulations.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Aug;16(4):29-31.
6
Severely handicapped infants with life-threatening conditions: federal intrusions into the decision not to treat.患有危及生命疾病的严重残疾婴儿:联邦政府对不进行治疗决策的干预。
Am J Law Med. 1986;12(2):171-205.
7
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
8
Government intercedes in "Baby Jane Doe".
Science. 1983 Nov 25;222(4626):908. doi: 10.1126/science.6227081.
9
Putting hospitals on notice.让医院引起注意。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1982 Aug;12(4):5-8.
10
Reporting the case of Baby Jane Doe.报道无名女婴简的案例。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1984 Aug;14(4):7-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Health policy in the United States: issues and options.美国的卫生政策:问题与选择。
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1987 Jun;63(5):427-79.