Department of Social Work and Psychosociology, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Lévis, QC, Canada.
Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2230813. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2230813.
The scale-up and sustainability of social innovations for health have received increased interest in global health research in recent years; however, these ambiguous concepts are poorly defined and insufficiently theorised and studied. Researchers, policymakers, and practitioners lack conceptual clarity and integrated frameworks for the scale-up and sustainability of global health innovations. Often, the frameworks developed are conceived in a linear and deterministic or consequentialist vision of the diffusion of innovations. This approach limits the consideration of complexity in scaling up and sustaining innovations.
By using a systems theory lens and conducting a narrative review, this manuscript aims to produce an evidence-based integrative conceptual framework for the scale-up and sustainability of global health innovations.
We conducted a hermeneutic narrative review to synthetise different definitions of scale-up and sustainability to model an integrative definition of these concepts for global health. We have summarised the literature on the determinants that influence the conditions for innovation success or failure while noting the interconnections between internal and external innovation environments.
The internal innovation environment includes innovation characteristics (effectiveness and testability, monitoring and evaluation systems, simplification processes, resource requirements) and organisational characteristics (leadership and governance, organisational change, and organisational viability). The external innovation environment refers to receptive and transformative environments; the values, cultures, norms, and practices of individuals, communities, organisations, and systems; and other contextual characteristics relevant to innovation development.
From these syntheses, we proposed an interconnected framework for action to better guide innovation researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in incorporating complexity and systemic interactions between internal and external innovation environments in global health.
近年来,全球卫生研究越来越关注卫生领域社会创新的扩大规模和可持续性;然而,这些模糊的概念定义不明确,理论和研究也不足。研究人员、政策制定者和实践者缺乏扩大全球卫生创新规模和可持续性的概念清晰度和综合框架。通常,开发的框架是在创新传播的线性和确定性或后果主义愿景中构思的。这种方法限制了对扩大规模和维持创新的复杂性的考虑。
本研究通过使用系统理论视角并进行叙述性综述,旨在为全球卫生创新的扩大规模和可持续性生成一个基于证据的综合概念框架。
我们进行了阐释性叙述性综述,以综合扩大规模和可持续性的不同定义,为全球卫生的这些概念建立综合定义模型。我们总结了影响创新成功或失败条件的文献,同时注意到内部和外部创新环境之间的相互联系。
内部创新环境包括创新特征(有效性和可测试性、监测和评估系统、简化流程、资源需求)和组织特征(领导力和治理、组织变革和组织可行性)。外部创新环境是指接受和变革环境;个人、社区、组织和系统的价值观、文化、规范和实践;以及与创新发展相关的其他背景特征。
从这些综合中,我们提出了一个相互关联的行动框架,以更好地指导创新研究人员、实践者和政策制定者在全球卫生中纳入内部和外部创新环境之间的复杂性和系统相互作用。