Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 17;13(7):e067658. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067658.
Reducing inequalities in health and financial risk are key goals on the path toward universal health coverage, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. The design of the health benefit package creates an opportunity to select interventions through established criteria. The aim of this study is to examine the health equity and financial protection impact of selected interventions, along with their costs, at the national level in Ethiopia.
Distributional cost-effectiveness analysis.
The eligible population for all selected interventions is assumed to be 10 million.
Data on disease prevalence and population size were gathered from the Global Burden of Disease database, and average health benefits and program costs are sourced from the Ethiopian Essential Health Service Package (EHSP) database, national surveys and other publicly available sources.
A total of 30 interventions were selected from the latest EHSP revision and analysed over a 1-year period.
Health benefits, social welfare indices and financial protection metrics across income quintiles were reported.
We found 23 interventions that improve population health and reduce health inequality and four interventions reduce both population health and health inequality. Additionally, three interventions improve population health while increasing health inequality. Overall, the EHSP interventions provide a 0.021 improvement in health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE) per person, with a positive distributional equity impact: 0.029 (26.9%) HALE gained in the poorest and 0.015 (14.0%) in the richest quintile. Similarly, a total of 1 79 475 cases of catastrophic health expenditure were averted, including 82 100 (46.0%) cases in the poorest and 17 900 (10.0%) in the richest quintile.
Increasing access to the EHSP improves health equity and financial protection. Improved access to selected EHSP interventions also has the potential to provide greater benefits to the poorest and thereby improve social welfare.
在实现全民健康覆盖的道路上,减少健康和财务风险方面的不平等是关键目标,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家。医疗福利套餐的设计为通过既定标准选择干预措施提供了机会。本研究旨在考察埃塞俄比亚国家层面上选定干预措施的健康公平和财务保护影响及其成本。
分配效价分析。
所有选定干预措施的合格人群被假定为 1000 万人。
疾病流行率和人口规模数据取自全球疾病负担数据库,平均健康效益和项目成本取自埃塞俄比亚基本卫生服务包数据库、国家调查和其他公开来源。
从最新的基本卫生服务包修订版中选择了总共 30 项干预措施,并在 1 年内进行了分析。
我们发现,有 23 项干预措施改善了人口健康,减少了健康不平等,有 4 项干预措施同时降低了人口健康和健康不平等。此外,有 3 项干预措施在提高人口健康的同时增加了健康不平等。总体而言,基本卫生服务包干预措施使每个人的健康调整生命预期(HALE)提高了 0.021,具有积极的分配公平影响:最贫穷的五分之一获得了 0.029 的 HALE 增长(26.9%),最富裕的五分之一获得了 0.015 的 HALE 增长(14.0%)。同样,共避免了 179475 例灾难性卫生支出病例,其中最贫穷的五分之一有 82100 例(46.0%),最富裕的五分之一有 17900 例(10.0%)。
增加对基本卫生服务包的获取可改善健康公平和财务保护。增加对选定基本卫生服务包干预措施的获取也有可能为最贫困人群带来更大的效益,从而改善社会福利。