Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Nat Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):380-387. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01268-y. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
All countries worldwide have signed up to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and have committed to the objective of achieving 'universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all'. During the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond, advancement toward universal health coverage (UHC) will become more difficult for many countries, demonstrating that locally led priority setting is urgently needed to provide health services with appropriate financial protection to all. Because resources are limited and no national constituency can provide an unlimited number of services to their whole population in a sustainable manner, rationing and setting priorities for the selection of interventions to be included in a defined package of services is critical. In this Perspective, we discuss how packages of essential health services can be developed in resource-constrained settings, and detail how experts and the public can decide on principles and criteria, use a comprehensive array of analytical methods and choose which services to be provided free of charge. We illustrate these main steps while drawing on a recently conducted exercise of revising the national essential health services package in Ethiopia, which we compare with examples from other countries that have defined their essential benefits packages. This Perspective also provides recommendations for other low- and middle-income countries on their pathway to UHC.
全世界各国都已签署联合国可持续发展目标,并承诺实现“全民健康覆盖,包括财务风险保护,提供优质基本医疗服务,以及为所有人提供安全、有效、优质和负担得起的基本药物和疫苗”这一目标。在新冠肺炎疫情期间及以后,许多国家实现全民健康覆盖的进展将变得更加困难,这表明迫切需要以地方为主导确定优先事项,为所有人提供具有适当财务保障的卫生服务。由于资源有限,没有任何国家的选民能够以可持续的方式为其全体民众提供无限数量的服务,因此对干预措施进行配给和优先选择,将其纳入明确的一揽子服务中至关重要。在本观点文章中,我们讨论了如何在资源有限的情况下制定基本卫生服务一揽子计划,并详细介绍了专家和公众如何就原则和标准做出决策,使用综合的分析方法,并选择免费提供哪些服务。我们将通过最近在埃塞俄比亚修订国家基本卫生服务一揽子计划的实践来阐述这些主要步骤,并与其他已确定基本福利包的国家的例子进行比较。本观点文章还为其他中低收入国家实现全民健康覆盖提供了相关建议。