• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症相关住院患者中新发使用第二代口服或长效注射抗精神病药物的患者的连续性护理。

Continuity of care among patients newly initiated on second-generation oral or long-acting injectable antipsychotics during a schizophrenia-related inpatient stay.

机构信息

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.

Analysis Group, Inc, Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Aug;39(8):1157-1166. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2237833. Epub 2023 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2023.2237833
PMID:37461233
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maintaining continuity of care after schizophrenia-related hospitalization is challenging for patients and healthcare providers and systems. Prior evidence suggests that second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics (SGLAIs) may reduce the risk of treatment nonadherence and readmission versus oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs). Therefore, quality measures were compared between patients initiated on SGLAIs and OAAs in the United States.

METHODS

Adults newly initiated on an SGLAI or OAA during a schizophrenia-related inpatient stay were identified in HealthVerity databases (01/2015-12/2020); the index date was the hospital discharge date. Patients had continuous health insurance coverage for pharmacy and medical services for 6 months pre-admission and post-discharge from the inpatient stay and ≥1 pharmacy or medical claim (i.e. treatment as indicated by the observed insurance claims) for an antipsychotic other than the index SGLAI or OAA in the 6 months pre-admission. Antipsychotic use and adherence, and schizophrenia-related readmissions and outpatient visits were compared during the 6-month period post-discharge. Characteristics between cohorts were balanced using inverse probability weights.

RESULTS

Post-discharge, only 36.9% and 40.7% of weighted SGLAI ( = 466) and OAA ( = 517) patients had ≥1 pharmacy or medical claim for the antipsychotic initiated during the inpatient stay, among whom SGLAI patients were 4.4 times more likely to be adherent to that antipsychotic compared to OAA patients ( < .001). Additionally, SGLAI patients were 2.3 and 3.0 times more likely to have a pharmacy or medical claim for and be adherent to any antipsychotic relative to OAA patients (including index antipsychotic; all  < .001). Within 7 and 30 days post-discharge, 1.7% and 13.0% of SGLAI patients and 4.1% and 12.6% of OAA patients had a readmission. Further, SGLAI patients were 51% more likely to have an outpatient visit compared to OAA patients ( = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than half of patients initiated on antipsychotics during a schizophrenia-related inpatient stay continued the same treatment post-discharge. However, SGLAI patients were more likely to be adherent to the initiated antipsychotic and to have an outpatient visit, which may suggest improved continuity of care post-discharge relative to OAA patients.

摘要

背景

对于精神分裂症相关住院患者及其医疗服务提供者和系统来说,保持治疗的连续性具有挑战性。先前的证据表明,第二代长效注射抗精神病药物(SGLAIs)与口服非典型抗精神病药物(OAAs)相比,可能降低治疗不依从和再入院的风险。因此,在美国对接受 SGLAIs 和 OAAs 治疗的患者进行了质量指标比较。

方法

在 HealthVerity 数据库中(2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月)确定了因精神分裂症相关住院而首次接受 SGLAI 或 OAA 治疗的成年人;索引日期为出院日期。患者在入院前 6 个月和出院后 6 个月内持续享受医疗保险覆盖的药房和医疗服务,并且在入院前 6 个月内,除索引 SGLAI 或 OAA 之外,有≥1 次药房或医疗服务的抗精神病药物报销(即观察到的保险报销所表明的治疗)。在出院后 6 个月内比较了抗精神病药物的使用和依从性,以及精神分裂症相关的再入院和门诊就诊情况。使用逆概率权重平衡了队列之间的特征。

结果

出院后,仅 36.9%和 40.7%的加权 SGLAI( = 466)和 OAA( = 517)患者在住院期间至少有 1 次药房或医疗服务的抗精神病药物报销,其中 SGLAI 患者的依从性比 OAA 患者高 4.4 倍( < .001)。此外,SGLAI 患者使用任何抗精神病药物的药房或医疗服务报销和依从性比 OAA 患者高 2.3 倍和 3.0 倍(包括索引抗精神病药物;均< .001)。在出院后 7 天和 30 天内,SGLAI 患者中有 1.7%和 13.0%,OAA 患者中有 4.1%和 12.6%再次入院。此外,与 OAA 患者相比,SGLAI 患者门诊就诊的可能性高 51%( = .044)。

结论

不到一半的因精神分裂症相关住院而接受抗精神病药物治疗的患者在出院后继续接受相同的治疗。然而,SGLAI 患者更有可能坚持使用初始抗精神病药物,并进行门诊就诊,这可能表明与 OAA 患者相比,SGLAI 患者出院后的治疗连续性得到了改善。

相似文献

1
Continuity of care among patients newly initiated on second-generation oral or long-acting injectable antipsychotics during a schizophrenia-related inpatient stay.精神分裂症相关住院患者中新发使用第二代口服或长效注射抗精神病药物的患者的连续性护理。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Aug;39(8):1157-1166. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2237833. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
Treatment Patterns, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Spending in Medicaid Beneficiaries Initiating Second-generation Long-acting Injectable Agents Versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics.启动第二代长效注射剂与口服非典型抗精神病药物的医疗补助受益人的治疗模式、医疗资源利用及支出情况
Clin Ther. 2017 Oct;39(10):1972-1985.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
3
A comparison of treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among young adult Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia treated with paliperidone palmitate or oral atypical antipsychotics in the US.美国使用棕榈酸帕利哌酮或口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗的患有精神分裂症的年轻成年医疗补助受益人的治疗模式、医疗资源利用及成本比较
J Med Econ. 2018 Dec;21(12):1221-1229. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1527608. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
4
Adherence, healthcare resource utilization and Medicaid spending associated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate versus oral atypical antipsychotic treatment among adults recently diagnosed with schizophrenia.近期诊断为精神分裂症的成年人中,每月一次棕榈酸帕利哌酮与口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗的依从性、医疗资源利用及医疗补助支出情况
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1358-3.
5
Treatment discontinuation of long-acting injectables or oral atypical antipsychotics among Medicaid recipients with schizophrenia.医疗补助计划的精神分裂症患者中长效注射剂或口服非典型抗精神病药物的停药情况。
J Med Econ. 2019 Nov;22(11):1105-1112. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1615927. Epub 2019 May 23.
6
Antipsychotic Adherence, Resource Use, and Costs Before and After the Initiation of Once-monthly Paliperidone Palmitate Therapy Among Medicaid Beneficiaries With Prior Schizophrenia Relapse.抗精神病药依从性、资源利用和成本在有既往精神分裂症复发的医疗补助受益人群中使用每月一次棕榈酸帕利哌酮治疗前后的变化。
Clin Ther. 2021 Mar;43(3):535-548. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
7
Comparison of Medicaid spending in schizoaffective patients treated with once monthly paliperidone palmitate or oral atypical antipsychotics.每月一次棕榈酸帕利哌酮或口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗的分裂情感性障碍患者的医疗补助支出比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(4):759-69. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1140634. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
8
Healthcare resource utilization of second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics in schizophrenia: risperidone versus paliperidone palmitate.第二代长效注射用抗精神病药物在精神分裂症中的医疗资源利用:利培酮与棕榈酸帕利哌酮对比
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Nov;32(11):1873-1881. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1219706. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
9
Impact of Paliperidone Palmitate Versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics on Health Care Resource Use and Costs in Veterans With Schizophrenia and Comorbid Substance Abuse.棕榈酸帕利哌酮与口服非典型抗精神病药物对合并物质滥用的退伍军人精神分裂症患者医疗资源利用及成本的影响。
Clin Ther. 2017 Jul;39(7):1380-1395.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.356. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
10
National and regional description of healthcare measures among adult Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia within the United States.美国成年医疗补助计划精神分裂症患者的医疗保健措施的国家和地区描述。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):792-807. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2084234.

引用本文的文献

1
Post Hospitalization Clinical Quality Outcomes Among US Patients with Schizophrenia Treated with a Long-Acting Injectable or Switched to a New Oral Antipsychotic: A Retrospective Cohort Study.美国使用长效注射剂治疗或改用新型口服抗精神病药物的精神分裂症患者住院后的临床质量结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024 Mar;11(1):69-79. doi: 10.1007/s40801-023-00408-9. Epub 2023 Dec 21.