Jagger C, Clarke M, Davies R A
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986 Jun;40(2):139-42. doi: 10.1136/jech.40.2.139.
The physical status of all people aged 75 and over living in and around Melton Mowbray was assessed by the responses to a series of questions on the activities of daily living that the respondents could perform. Three methods of producing an index of disability from these separate questions are investigated: principal component analysis, Guttman scaling, and a variation of Guttman scaling known as severity grading. All the methods produced very similar rankings of persons, confirming the suggestion of Bebbington that the choice of scaling method is of little consequence. Two scales emerged: one measuring physical ability and the other the level of urinary and faecal incontinence.
通过对一系列关于受访者能够进行的日常生活活动问题的回答,对居住在梅尔顿莫布雷及其周边地区的所有75岁及以上老人的身体状况进行了评估。研究了从这些单独问题中生成残疾指数的三种方法:主成分分析、古特曼量表法,以及一种称为严重程度分级的古特曼量表法变体。所有方法得出的人员排名非常相似,这证实了贝宾顿的观点,即量表法的选择影响不大。出现了两个量表:一个衡量身体能力,另一个衡量大小便失禁程度。