Mertz Kenneth H, Reitelseder Søren, Rasmussen Morten A, Bülow Jacob, Højfeldt Grith, Jensen Mikkel, Hjulmand Morten, Lindberg Jonas, Kramer Mathilde U, Bechshøft Rasmus, Holm Lars
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Oct 1;37(10):2064-2070. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004517. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
Mertz, KH, Reitelseder, S, Rasmussen, MA, Bülow, J, Højfeldt, G, Jensen, M, Hjulmand, M, Lindberg, J, Kramer, MU, Bechshøft, R, and Holm, L. Changes in muscle mass and strength during follow-up after one-year resistance training interventions in older adults. J Strength Cond Res 37(10): 2064-2070, 2023-The aim of this study was to investigate if home-based resistance training compared with center-based resistance training was associated with better preservation of muscle mass and strength in older individuals, 6 months after the interventions ended. One hundred four healthy older individuals (>65 years) who had completed 1 year of either home-based light-intensity training with daily whey protein supplementation (LITW), center-based heavy resistance training with whey protein supplementation (HRTW), or daily whey protein supplementation alone (WHEY) returned for follow-up measurement 6 months after the interventions. Measures of muscle mass, strength, and power were assessed at the end of intervention as well as at follow-up. Furthermore, we compared changes in these parameters between subjects who continued resistance training (≥1 weekly training session) during follow-up (CONT) with those who stopped (STOP). Resistance training continuation during follow-up did not differ between HRTW and LITW (41 vs. 41%, P = 1.0) but was higher for both groups compared with WHEY (18%, P = 0.04-0.05). However, no between-group differences were observed between LITW/HRTW/WHEY in changes in muscle mass, strength, or power during follow-up. STOP was associated with a poorer preservation of quadriceps cross-sectional area compared with CONT (-1.7 cm 2 [-0.4 to -3.0], P = 0.01, effect size: 0.79). No effect of training continuation was observed on changes in muscle strength and power. In conclusion, maintenance of muscle mass and strength is not superior after home-based resistance training compared with center-based training. However, training continuation seems crucial for the maintenance of muscle mass, irrespective of the training intervention.
默茨,KH;赖特尔塞德,S;拉斯穆森,MA;比洛,J;霍伊费尔特,G;延森,M;胡尔曼德,M;林德伯格,J;克莱默,MU;贝奇肖夫特,R;霍尔姆,L。老年人进行为期一年的抗阻训练干预后随访期间肌肉质量和力量的变化。《力量与体能研究杂志》37(10): 2064 - 2070,2023年。本研究的目的是调查在干预结束6个月后,与基于中心的抗阻训练相比,居家抗阻训练是否与老年个体更好地保持肌肉质量和力量相关。104名健康的老年人(>65岁),他们完成了1年的以下训练之一:居家轻强度训练并每日补充乳清蛋白(LITW)、基于中心的重抗阻训练并补充乳清蛋白(HRTW)或仅每日补充乳清蛋白(WHEY),在干预结束6个月后返回进行随访测量。在干预结束时以及随访时评估肌肉质量、力量和功率的指标。此外,我们比较了随访期间继续进行抗阻训练(≥每周1次训练课)的受试者(CONT)与停止训练的受试者(STOP)之间这些参数的变化。HRTW和LITW在随访期间抗阻训练的持续情况没有差异(41%对41%,P = 1.0),但与WHEY组相比,两组的持续率更高(18%,P = 0.04 - 0.05)。然而,在随访期间,LITW/HRTW/WHEY组之间在肌肉质量、力量或功率的变化方面未观察到组间差异。与CONT组相比,STOP组股四头肌横截面积的保持情况较差(-1.7平方厘米[-0.4至-3.0],P = 0.01,效应大小:0.79)。未观察到训练持续对肌肉力量和功率变化的影响。总之,与基于中心的训练相比,居家抗阻训练后肌肉质量和力量的保持并不更优。然而,无论训练干预如何,训练的持续似乎对肌肉质量的维持至关重要。